Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
lmfao
09 Nov 09 16:28
Joined:
Date Joined: 07 Jun 06
| Topic/replies: 6,403 | Blogger: lmfao's blog
COME ON THEN - A SIMPLE VOTE - UNTIL MIDNIGHT TONIGHT- NO OTHER COMMENTS PLEASE- A STRAIGHT FORWARD VOTE


IF YOU ARE FOR THE CONTINUED SMOKING BAN IN PUBS -
SAY 'YES'


IF YOU WANT THE BAN LIFTED - SAY 'NO'

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 70
By:
lmfao
When: 09 Nov 09 16:29
YES
By:
evski
When: 09 Nov 09 16:30
NO
By:
uncle monty
When: 09 Nov 09 16:31
yes
By:
zilzal1
When: 09 Nov 09 16:33
Yes
By:
zilzal1
When: 09 Nov 09 16:34
Cancel that

NO NO, A THOUSAND TIMES NO
By:
Bamboo
When: 09 Nov 09 16:37
YES
By:
Gary Binosh
When: 09 Nov 09 16:41
Y
E !!!!!
S
By:
Early Morning Riser
When: 09 Nov 09 16:42
nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
By:
zilzal1
When: 09 Nov 09 16:44
Its worded wrong mate


You should put, should there be non smoking and smoking pubs imo
By:
Ivor
When: 09 Nov 09 16:47
^ zigzag is correct
By:
wallboy
When: 09 Nov 09 16:49
yes
By:
wallboy
When: 09 Nov 09 16:49
i want the ban lifted
By:
redrich
When: 09 Nov 09 16:54
DON'T KNOW
By:
Tevez is God
When: 09 Nov 09 16:54
yes
By:
liamcol
When: 09 Nov 09 16:55
no
By:
Tevez is God
When: 09 Nov 09 16:55
but zilzal's Q is a better one
By:
Ovalman.
When: 09 Nov 09 16:56
yes
By:
takethestand
When: 09 Nov 09 17:16
yes
By:
fouraces
When: 09 Nov 09 17:30
lmfao

why the feck are you so obsessed with smoking

go get a life mate
By:
lmfao
When: 09 Nov 09 17:53
lmfao 09 Nov 18:51


Surgeon General: No Safe Level for Secondhand Smoke
Report Bolsters Clean Indoor Air Efforts



Secondhand smoke is dangerous in any amount, and the only way to protect people from that danger is to eliminate indoor smoking. SOURCE: US Surgeon General Richard Carmona. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke.

"The health effects of secondhand smoke exposure are more pervasive than we previously thought," said Carmona, vice admiral of the US Public Health Service. "The scientific evidence is now indisputable: Secondhand smoke is not a mere annoyance. It is a serious health hazard that can lead to disease and premature death in children and nonsmoking adults."

Cancer experts praised Carmona's report, which adds weight to efforts to get clean indoor air laws passed throughout the country.

"Today's report should end any lingering debate over the importance of enacting comprehensive smoke-free laws," said John Seffrin PhD, chief executive officer of the American Cancer Society. "The report confirms that the only way to protect people from secondhand smoke is to eliminate their exposure."

Secondhand Smoke Causes Lung Cancer, Other Diseases
Medical experts and public health officials have long known that secondhand smoke poses a danger to non-smokers. A Surgeon General's report in 1986 found that secondhand smoke can cause lung cancer, and also concluded that merely separating smokers from nonsmokers doesn't eliminate the threat from secondhand smoke.

The new report pulls together evidence from the numerous studies that have been done on secondhand smoke since that time. It includes in-depth analyses of the toxic effects of secondhand smoke, including how it causes cancer, damages the respiratory tract, and harms the circulatory system. The report also examines the impact of secondhand smoke on children, and looks at exposure levels in the United States.

In terms of cancer, the report confirms that secondhand smoke can cause lung cancer and that nonsmokers who live with a smoker have a 20%-30% higher risk of lung cancer because of exposure to secondhand smoke.

The report says there isn't enough evidence to say for sure that secondhand smoke causes breast cancer, but existing evidence is "suggestive."

Other major conclusions:


Secondhand smoke causes premature death and disease in adults and children who do not smoke.
Exposure to secondhand smoke has immediate negative effects on the heart, and causes heart disease and lung cancer.
Secondhand smoke can worsen asthma in children, and puts them at risk for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), respiratory infections, and ear problems.
Scientific evidence shows that there is no risk-free level of exposure to secondhand smoke.
Millions of American adults and children are still exposed to secondhand smoke at home and in the workplace.
Having separate smoking and nonsmoking areas, cleaning the air, and ventilating buildings cannot eliminate secondhand smoke exposure. Prohibiting smoking in indoor spaces does.

tHIS IS WHY THE SMOKING BAN IN PUBS MUST REMAIN IN FORCE
By:
Splicer Keats
When: 09 Nov 09 17:54
Yes, Yes and thrice Yes.
By:
popup
When: 09 Nov 09 17:56
Yes, and i would go as far to say they should also ban the selling of alcohol in pubs.
By:
Early Morning Riser
When: 09 Nov 09 17:58
and i beleive the fat facking non-smokers should be banned from macdonalds
By:
Far From Trouble
When: 09 Nov 09 17:59
YES
By:
Splicer Keats
When: 09 Nov 09 18:00
Nobby's nuts should be banned too hth.
By:
JUGADOR MEJOR
When: 09 Nov 09 18:05
No to the ban.

I think most people on here would shut down pubs completely and build mosques.
By:
gleeman
When: 09 Nov 09 18:18
Yes
By:
TJM
When: 09 Nov 09 18:25
matters not but keep it imo.
By:
lmfao
When: 09 Nov 09 19:18
ongoing count:

yes 13
no 5
other ballot papers disqualified

more votes please
By:
shatner's bassoon
When: 09 Nov 09 19:19
NO
By:
flushgordon
When: 09 Nov 09 19:21
the man from del monte he say YES
By:
lmfao
When: 09 Nov 09 19:21
Today's report should end any lingering debate over the importance of enacting comprehensive smoke-free laws," said John Seffrin PhD, chief executive officer of the American Cancer Society. "The report confirms that the only way to protect people from secondhand smoke is to eliminate their exposure."
By:
canaryboy
When: 09 Nov 09 19:21
yes
By:
Early Morning Riser
When: 09 Nov 09 19:22
well you yes voters will need to vote against the tories come june
By:
punterfleecer
When: 09 Nov 09 19:26
no
By:
johnizere
When: 09 Nov 09 19:29
No, and ban pork scratchings while we're at it.
By:
Lozzy
When: 09 Nov 09 19:30
YES THE BAN IS CORRECT to protect healthy people breathing in that cancer ridden filth.
By:
flushgordon
When: 09 Nov 09 19:30
pork scratchings will soon be banned under sharia law ,you will be eating abduls knacker scratchings soon.
By:
the finster
When: 09 Nov 09 19:35
yes
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com