We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Thoughts on Haye vs Valuev?
2.2+ the big lad looks, well, value!
2.2+ the big lad looks, well, value!
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 26
|
By:
Given his size he should knock seven kinds of sh1t out of Haye, but he floats like a dinosaur and stings like a brick. In short, he's the worst world heavyweight champ I've seen. Can't move, has no combinations, and wins by sheer size alone.
Holyfield, 96 pounds lighters, and 46 years old, took him 12 rounds ffs. He's a bum, and can consider himself lucky I'm too old for the game now. :) Haye is not a true heavyweight in todays terms. At 15 stones he will struggle against this monster, but if he gets stuck in he may get lucky, but he hasn't got a cast iron jaw imo, so he's got to dodge the jabs as 23 stones can jab hard. CONCLUSION : One too small, the other too clumsy = NO BET |
|
By:
David Haye drifting .... now 1.88
thanks o ........... you beat me to it :) |
|
By:
Bleedin' 'ell.
I'm already on! I shall trust to the 'puncher's chance'. |
|
By:
It's all the old git's good for, CC ;)
|
|
By:
was that it ? :0
|
|
By:
went to make a cuppa ............. came back and he's on the floor
tell me it was some other fight |
|
By:
It's tomorrow, you great nit :^0
|
|
By:
Did you see the youtube link I left on 'Calling Big Old Ugly Jug Eared Charlie' 1 ?
|
|
By:
I didn't.
|
|
By:
'ang on guv'nor
|
|
By:
Brilliant summary at 21-06 BC
The conclusion (NO BET) reminded me of Janov's big sporting event previews, which invariably ended no bet. lol |
|
By:
21-31* not 21-06
|
|
By:
Good old Janov. I had his email address a few years ago, but lost it when my old PC blew up.
|
|
By:
Who's betting on what ?
|
|
By:
Back the draw, sky will love a rematch at 14.95 a go.
|
|
By:
I took the big fella at 2.2 yesterday.
|
|
By:
Done me money :(
|
|
By:
So did I
I took a chance on seeing some action and layed it to finish in the first 6 rounds at 1.36 I then got in at 1.9 for Valuev on points a quarter way through the 11th. Couldn't lay off - it got as low as 1.33 then it was suspended just after Haye caught him with that left hander. Bean (singular) on toast for lunch tomorrow. :( And that russian is facking useless. |
|
By:
Your pockets picked by a bunch of bandits. Will you never learn?
|
|
By:
I'm looking at rainwater**tails and dock leaf salad.
Dark days. |
|
By:
Stoutey looks rather poxy?
|
|
By:
^
|
|
By:
O, wherefore art thou?
|
|
By:
Garfunkel is appearing nightly at a venue not too near to you.
|
|
By:
Pity his voice doesn't exist any more.
|
|
By:
http://www.theguardian.com/music/2014/sep/07/art-garfunkel-review-manchester
|