Cheltenham Festival
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Who do you fancy and why?
if its a tie, is it half of the odds?
if its a tie, is it half of the odds?
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 9
|
By:
Mullins seems overpriced to me. Backed him a few days ago. Might not have the obvious superstars but looks to have plenty of good chances. Should be shorter than Henderson for me.
|
|
By:
Gordon
|
|
By:
brown,texture like sun
|
|
By:
Gordon Elliott's price on this market has contracted to 5/4, but on Sportsbook's specials he is 13/8 to train five or more winners which should be fewer than he would need to retain his title anyway.
|
|
By:
Gordon Elliott's price on this market has contracted to 5/4, but on Sportsbook's specials he is 13/8 to train five or more winners which should be fewer than he would need to retain his title anyway.
|
|
By:
I'm not sure i go with that Govan,historically 3 has won the top trainers,quite possible 4 with a couple of 2nds would be a strong enough position to do it given the fairly strong teams of Henderson,Mullins,O'Brien imo.
|
|
By:
The reason I backed Gordon Elliot
Is because a certain statistician on here told me the irish get 10% winners or summat like that ...and hes got 80 odd runners SIMPLES   |
|
By:
Gordon will have around 50 runners in the 28 races. It would surprise me if the leading trainer has fewer than five winners although it has happened twice in the last decade. Looking at the strength of his team I'd expect Elliott to add to his 14 in the last two years and find that I've already backed a good number of his horses separately already.
|
|
By:
I would be taking the special bet over outright winning. I'd say he'd not be far off the five regardless of winning or not
|