Apples Jade

Because they're non runner no bet and the exchanges are not.

Still, don't think many nrnb discrepancies like that. Power must be stupid going 11/4. 365 14/1. Suppose it's one way to do himself out of business

What are you talking about ffs??

PP have priced her up as if she is running as they're non runner no bet, if she runs she would likely be fav or close to being fav.

Is a pretty simple thing to understand, they're on a hiding to nothing if they put her in anything over what they believe her price is if she was a runner.

And fack knows what 365 are at, if you can bet with the shower and don't mind habing funds tied up for a few weeks ya may as well bet her at 14s, it's massively short you'll jist get your money back but if she did run you then have a great bet or trade.

14/1 nrnb would be an amazing price if available. 99% certain to run in the mares race but if it did run in the stayers would be favourite so 14/1 is madness.

365 is nrnb. Looks pretty certain to run in Mares anyway, being 65.0 exch

they've done similar in Supreme with Samcro, a very silly risk, I know Samcro is a non-runner but wouldn't be surprised if Apples Jade went Stayers. You are getting your money back or 14/1 about a 5/2 shot

It is a bit of a business risk, but bookies are not renowned for taking unnecessary risk without the likelihood of a return. Just maybe the bookies have hedged with the horses concerned; horses were unlikely runners and/or winners; nrnb money would most likely be used with them (eventually); money earning interest in the bank.