Al Ferof drift!

could see this running in the gold cup. john hayles has wanted him in the gold cup all along and he's not afraid to put his foot down

Somethings up, for the layers to get it out to that

What I don't get is, when one drifts like this, 99% of them end up having had an set back like weeks ago etc etc. Which is why betfair exchange market is a great guide to what goes where etc as regards the festival. But who's laying them at the huge prices? I mean anyone in the yard in sure would surely have some kind of clause in their contract about relaying information etc and may or may not be allowed to lay or bet on the horse they are employed to look after surely? But even if they are, who's interested in a no more than a tenner laying up sometimes £100s if not £1000s for weeks and weeks?
Always baffled the heck out of me that. But long may it continue lol. Cos its these types of markets movements that form 90% of the basis of my own betting

It's just economics, STS. If there's no one backing it the price gets bigger and bigger.
As soon as backers move in the price gets smaller. Layers don't want to see a horse winning
the whole book because that's a missed opportunity.

Think he and Uxizandre are suffering from where are they going syndrome.

Sea on another thread while back you stated you layed Sprinter and Sire in Champion Chase? And backed Bullets was that correct?

Method is sound, essentially trading horses prices. It works in Cheltenham Antepost markets because they aren't priced up to an overround like every other market. So when the market opens on the day you could have a very strong hand then trade out or lower liability on horses you don't want as much as you'll know what the ground is like. It's book building essentially.

I do it also but usually it's based around reading many sources of racing info, RP, Irish Racing, Weekender, Sportinglife, Irihtimes etc.. to absorb trainer comments. Once I see a race nominated or one of two I back the horse on betfair for the race if I believe he'll be much shorter on the day if turning up.

My angle is knowledge of targets or deducing where horses will run at Cheltenham which can yield value. It is impossible to post up what you've got in various races on here so I don't bother at all. Just when I've a decent bet on one with a bookie, like say Zarkandar for World Hurdle, Wounded Warrior for NH Chase etc..

Each to their own method though stevo, people learn from their experiences. If you find something that works for you initially you latch onto it. I've changed my own method of betting quite significantly over the years but I rely on the same core thing, which is absorbing as much information including trainers comments to form opinions on horses, I've a very good memory so this has always been an asset from the start. 

What STS does, agree or disagree with his approach he's a regular contributor to the forum, doesn't troll people, majority of his posts are part of discussions around horses. You know just a regular forum poster. Personally I don't really pay too much attention to peoples approaches, I've got to a point where I'm confident in my own approach, but succum to my own flaws which I need to eradicate from my betting to improve.

Where other people are on their own learning curve, who knows. But I agree with you, picking a big odds winner out on a Monday night for the big handicap on Saturday is a sheer joy as great as the financial gain. I do love the threads in Antepost forum where someone starts it about a specific horse in a specific race at big odds and it wins. Top marks.

Giggsy called it as Al Ferof has been ruled out of the Betfair Ascot Chase on Saturday and the Cheltenham Festival because of injury.

Giggsy posted the Betfair market drift, but yet it took a week for connections to publicly announce it.

No honesty in this world any more.

Somebody knew, shame as i would had liked to see him line up in the champion chase.

As if it isn't hard enough 2 pick a Festival winner we also have 2 factor in that we may be backing a horse we don't know is already injured and not going 2 make it.

In today's Racing Post Nicholls says "I knew I was having a little bit of an ongoing issue with Al Ferof over the last ten days or so". Thanks for letting us know Paul!!

Sorry chief but I think that's silly.

All trainers are in a win-win situation if they simply tell people what's going on.

Nobody expects Willie to come out and say that this one will run in that race, and this one in that etc... but telling people that a horse has had an injury is just being straight. With this particular case, it was clear that some people knew the horse wasn't right. Nicholls writes for BF, so should at least have said he was having issues with him when he was.

I'm not saying he's innocent in all this, but I think he's being judged a bit harshly on this thread.  It'd be different if he'd said he was in good form at home, or he was working well.

I'm all for transparency, but he did say it was a minor problem.  There's every possibility he thought he could get him right, but might have ran out of time.  After all, if he is back for Aintree, it must be really minor.

I have no idea about the day to day running of a major yard like his, but I'm sure some have niggles and are behind schedule all the time.  It has to be a judgement call on his part which info he releases and which info he doesn't because he can't be giving daily updates to the media - maybe this time he got it wrong.

But as I said earlier, he doesn't have form of doing stuff like this, so I'm prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt.

I thought we were told about kauto's schooling fall pretty much right away

Yep. Full, honest, timely announcements should keep everyone happy. I don't see any reason that a trainer
would have for keeping the truth out of the public domain. Or is that naive?

When trainers have lots of horses, many of whom may have minor niggles or issues at any one time, it is probably difficult for (the honest ones at least) to know what to share and what not to, especially given that they are exceedingly busy.

What should be happening is that the industry media should be on top of obvious betting patterns on high profile horses in high profile races (as this was) and be asking said trainer (who may even be unaware of any market drift). It could then be reported what was said. The Racing Post does little in terms of this - contrast this with reporting on football in the daily papers when injuries to key players are widely reported. An RP journalist could have called Nichols and said there was concern all was not right with Al Ferof and I'm sure that Nichols would have given him an honest answer which could then be reported. The public would then be aware, both of the fact that there had been a significant drift and the views of the trainer.