Forums

Cheltenham Festival

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
tony2914
31 Dec 12 19:14
Joined:
Date Joined: 04 Nov 05
| Topic/replies: 253 | Blogger: tony2914's blog
IMO its looked very moderate in both its races . obviously the 1st is forgivable .but its not just been beaten its been beaten out of site. it may improve for better ground but good horses should be competative on any surface as last yr it won on soft. IS  there any reason to keep the faith with this one ? if there is imstrugglin to find it.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 16
By:
Graeme83
When: 31 Dec 12 21:10
I have backed the same horse. Faith in a gambling context is the day you saw something worth putting money on. If you regret the money you have put down, you are growing as a punter, and becoming an atheist against your own selection. We can only look at fact, and contradict the facts with a measure of hope. He has been pumped both times this season, but he needs a very fast gallop on better ground. I've not given up.
By:
SEATHESTARS....NO1
When: 01 Jan 13 15:58
The 2 main things this horse needs, and i think everyone on here agrees with, is good ground and a very fast pace to run off! He is almost guaranteed both at the festival!

Backed at 10s, and topped up at 20s myself!
By:
CheltenhamRoar
When: 01 Jan 13 17:40
Another Ebaziyan imo,Total regressive type.
By:
roobuck
When: 01 Jan 13 18:01
So everyone on here agrees with your assertion on what he needs sts?

Well might I point out that he has raced on good ground 4 times and won once. Going into the festival last year the concern about him was the quicker ground.

He won the Supreme well but that was on the back of a solid season showing he was in good form. This season he has either shown he is not in the same form or that his level is simply not good enough.

And as for needing a fast pace? Doesn't any decent horse?

And finally guaranteed good ground? This may happen but this season it is a dangerous assumption
By:
buddeliea
When: 01 Jan 13 18:12
very dangerous assumption
By:
Graeme83
When: 01 Jan 13 18:14
The concern about him and quicker ground is false. The trainer said he would improve on faster ground. There is also no evidence to suggest he isn't in the same form as last year, as he wasn't beating much. As for fast pace, it's much preferable than it turning into a sprint finish. It's a lot to ask for, but obviously some of us have backed him and are looking for positives, as opposed to looking for reason to have a fresh bet which would be different.
By:
Brooksielad
When: 01 Jan 13 18:16
personally think the novice hurdlers, bar Simonsig are pretty bad. I'd expect the seniors to fill the frame in the champion.

Only an opinion mind you.
By:
Graeme83
When: 01 Jan 13 18:19
Some novices improve more than others. Darlan done it well. I'd be slightly cautious with putting them all in the same boat.
By:
Brooksielad
When: 01 Jan 13 18:37
ofc you'll have some that will turn out better down the line. Although i think Darlan ain't that special myself and i got the feeling they think the same at hendo's when they were talking on channel 4.
By:
roobuck
When: 01 Jan 13 18:43
Graeme I accept that now the assumption is wrong but not necessarily at the time. He had proven form on heavy so does not  'need' good ground as the post claimed.

I agree that you need to trust your own eyes always in a gambling context and maintain the faith in the reasons you make that decision. I wish you luck but I'd want to see some better form before looking at him again.
By:
roobuck
When: 01 Jan 13 18:44
I'd be looking at Darlan for next year's Arkle
By:
Far From Trouble
When: 01 Jan 13 18:49
Cinders And Ashes' heavy ground form isn't worth squat imo. He won those races easily as he was entitled to by being the far, far superior horse


I think he needs better ground to be at his best.
By:
CheltenhamRoar
When: 01 Jan 13 19:05
He's flat bred,The vast majority of flat bred horse's normally regress after one good season.
By:
gutfeeling
When: 01 Jan 13 19:17
No evidence to suggest he isn't in the same form as last year...Well other than the 2 runs where he's had the balls beaten off of him or do we not include his races this season as his current form.
Good luck with your bet but i can't see him winning a Champion Hurdle on any ground personally.
By:
irishone
When: 01 Jan 13 20:02
i'd be very surprised if c & a was a top of the ground horse, may be a class issue or a second year loss of form as suggested imho.
By:
SEATHESTARS....NO1
When: 01 Jan 13 20:25
Well of all the posts i had read on here regarding C&A and come to the conclusion that most were of the same opinion as me. In that he has not shown the same level of form as last year simply because he has never had the pace to run off in either of his races and the ground on both occasions has been very soft! Yes he won all the last season on heavy/soft, but as the above poster stipulates, them runs are worthless as he beat nothing of any great quality!
Last years novice hurdlers may well prove out to be a dismal lot, but i talked with my wallet and thought 20/1 was far too big a price given the above possibilities! We will see in time i suppose.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com