Forums

Cheltenham Festival

Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
sj
30 Nov 12 17:05
Joined:
Date Joined: 16 Nov 02
| Topic/replies: 20,314 | Blogger: sj's blog
going 1/5 odds 1-2-3 for Cheltenham Festival, Ladbrokes for SOME races. A joke
Pause • Switch to Standard View Disgraceful William Hill
Show More
Loading...
Report ACStafford • November 30, 2012 5:15 PM GMT
You'd think they'd want to encourage some antepost each way betting, but those terms are awful, especially when you know you'll be getting 1/4 on the day.
Report roobuck • November 30, 2012 5:52 PM GMT
Would you really want to bet e/w at this stage?
Report pollybournemouth • November 30, 2012 6:02 PM GMT
I dont think  its important whether you want to back e/w now or not ! its wrong and firms like Hills should be exposed
Report sj • November 30, 2012 6:05 PM GMT
just spoke to Kate Miller on Twitter these were her replies

Kate Miller ‏@racingkate
@BoxingFan10 1/5 on some races. Not all. Standard ante-post terms are 1/5th. Although I realise 1/4 odds EW is a longstanding concession.

Kate Miller ‏@racingkate
@BoxingFan10 it isn't mathmatically viable to offer it on all races. Which I appreciate is disappointing for many. And I'm sorry

@BoxingFan10 No, many firms are chosing it as a loss-leader. We chose to run other concessions instead. It is advertised - and displayed.


Why wouldnt you want to back E/W at this stage Roo?
Report roobuck • November 30, 2012 6:52 PM GMT
Just personal I guess, but so much time for something to happen. Good chance might not make it so sooner keep the place stake for either another bet or going in later.

As an aside those races with most runners quoted do seem 1/4 odds but I understand the frustration
Report ACStafford • November 30, 2012 7:49 PM GMT
I wouldn't consider doing each way without nrnb. When backing a 20/1 shot, you'd be getting 5/1 the place which probably isn't as good value as the win price when you've factored in the chance of the horse not running. That's why I'm surprised that bookies aren't doing all they can to take antepost each way bets.
Report Tucho • November 30, 2012 8:04 PM GMT
exactly, they should be begging for each way money antepost

'not mathmatically viable' Laugh

with the amount of injuries, burst bubbles on hype horses, changing running plans what are they scared of? literally everything is in the bookies favour already
Report sj • November 30, 2012 10:39 PM GMT
Exactly what I said mate, I said you are talking nonsense and she replied with I'm not gonna carry on cos you're being "unpleasent" I questioned this and she said because I said I told her it was nonsense. Brilliant just said "keep those punters pumping the roulette machines"
Report Joist • December 1, 2012 1:33 AM GMT
ACStafford, you aren't getting 4/1 on the place of a 20/1 shot.

£1 e/w at 20s. Horse comes 3rd for 4/1 at a 1/5th the odds, you've got £1 @ 4/1 return of £5 for a £2 outlay. 5/2 the place. Happy
Report ACStafford • December 2, 2012 9:45 PM GMT
No. At 1/5th you get 4/1 for the place. The example you speak of makes 6/4 anyway, which is only relevant if you assume the win bet is an inevitable loser (such as betting each way on the stayers hurdle).
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com