Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
TheBetterBettor
10 Oct 21 10:26
Joined:
Date Joined: 10 Jan 12
| Topic/replies: 11,243 | Blogger: TheBetterBettor's blog
Their accuracy is mind blowing Crazy

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 3
By:
tobermory
When: 10 Oct 21 10:36
In boxing it is the refs count to ten that matters, rather than the precise time elapsed.

I guess it's supposed to be exactly 10 seconds, but it's not 10 until the ref says 10.
By:
sofaking
When: 10 Oct 21 17:58
Some black people are saying it was a slow count when Fury went down in the 4th round and there are cries of "wacism".  Fury just used it as an opportunity to take a breather (like he did in the first first when he channelled The Undertaker). A faster count and he still would've got up at the count of 8 or 9.
By:
Emitdeb
When: 11 Oct 21 16:39
Those counts were awful, too much worrying for Boxer welfare imo.. also the over exuberant referee seemed to favour Wilder with his constant breaking.... Wilder was lost inside.. imo.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com