Quigg v Munroe

dont know fa about boxing
is it a good thing?

quigg is nailed on

book - Munroe has been in with better and beaten them.  Quigg still to prove it.

looks good to go to points,so little saver on the draw

I really dont rate Quigg's chin

is o'connor scoring

Rhodes was 6-1 up on the cards V Rabchenko

he said that,but i find that hard to believe

Shocking aint it. Nick halling talks some balls dont he

very generous draw odds

o connor & parris doing the judging,oh dear

strong rd for munroe, quigg looked nervous

10-9 Munroe Quigg having a look. 2tone went downstairs a lot

Quigg wins 2nd round

halling hyped quigg up that rd,, still thought munroes won but could go either way

20-18 munroe

19-19 Quigg round. Although not as clear as Nick American football was trying to make out

Munroe in trouble now

NO CONTEST

cud be over here

GAME OVER

what are the rules in such an instance?!

are bets void

i wouldn't imagine so?

cant find market rules

its a draw,get in there u beauty

it goes on TECHNICAL DRAW

Technical draw

is this a technical draw gents????

?

who ever backed the DRAW is laughing !!

tech draw

haha

will the draw pay out on the draw

oh no

market settled as draw

WOW someone wins BIG MONEY with them ODDS

i mean on the match odds sorry

more pathetic rules from the british board should be a NC

yes scarecrow

wat happens if u back munroe decision

you lose

I layed Quigg so I win

i was up for 1200 on the draw,but put up a lay of 30 which got taken,but backed some more @ 22

because its a DRAW !!

sorry for rendall but i had a decent green on the draw at the time so it was good for me.

thats a joke shud b nocontest

carrie1187     16 Jun 12 22:30 
thats a joke shud b nocontest

British board havent got a brain cell between them

I laid quigg but feel like I've cheated people who backed him.

Help! does my lay of Quigg mean I've won?????

I won but I agree that really sucks. Shocking decision imo

Jun 16, 2012 -- 10:31PM, Norma Spoobs wrote:

Help! does my lay of Quigg mean I've won?????

Yes

Market settled and closed

not happy.

Wow I really won! I really that's right - what weird rules.

SJ- was official result a no contest..or does technical draw become official...?

TD is official result

fair enough...jesus his eye a mess

it was called as a technical draw by the compare when he announced the result.

Skybet refunded Munroe outright bet.

nice !! id say PP's would do the same  !

Is the Lee fight on sky sports early hours?

skybet didn't pay out on the draw though, they voided all bets

This fight was for the interim WBA World super bantamweight title, under WBA rules its a no decision. The WBA don't have a technical draw outcome in their rules.

just back from this, what a disappointing night. Towers fight was farcical, Rhodes disappointing then just bad luck with the cut. Fair amount of mither in the crowd after aswell, Munroe fans at ringside charging across the cycle track and getting stuck into the Quigg followers in the stand...no need for it at all.

they just go on the 'official' decision though don't they

Here's the WBA's rules, they don't even have a Technical Draw as a ruling.

b) ACCIDENTAL BLOWS: If the referee sees, or after consulting with
the doctor he concludes that a boxer has been injured in an accidental
manner, and as a consequence of this wound, the boxer is not able to
continue the fight, he shall IMMEDIATELY notify the Local
Commission representatives, the fight supervisor who represents the
World Boxing Association, and the judges of the fight, that the fight has
ended.
Should under the same circumstances (intentional unfair blow), the fight
could be resumed the referee shall notified the above mentioned
persons that the wound was produced by an accidental blow, for if the
wound gets worse in subsequent rounds and the suspension of the fight
would be deemed necessary, the decision to call shall be as follows:

NO DECISION: In case that both boxers are in a draw in the judges
scorecards, or in case that no more than four (4) rounds have passed
at the time he stopped the fight.

TECHNICAL DECISION: In favor of the boxer that is in advantage in the judges’ scorecards.

I had a bet on munroe to win with PP. To my amazement they said that as the official result was a technical draw, that a draw is their official result as well. I have forwarded the WBA rule to their customer services and they are now reviewing wether to overturn their result to NOCONTEST. fingers crossed and a big thankyou to Peter Rid for posting the rule

I'm not denying what the rules say, just that bookies will pay out on whatever the official decision is, right or wrong, if they change it all those people on the draw will be straight to IBAS, it's no different to trying them to get the first Dawson vs Hopkins fight changed before the commission stepped in.

You can't just go making the rules up as you go, the truth of the matter is the people who were paid out on the draw were wrongly paid out. The official decision will be changed to a No Decision when the incompetence of the BBBoC who was also a WBA official has been addressed.

the decision was a technical draw,which is the correct settlement.

any links to replays of this? Completely missed the punch that put rhodes down and wouldn't mind seeing the round where Towers was horizontal on the ropes again.

the bookies would be making it up if they settled on anything but the draw lol