TELL ME THIS IS SOME KIND OF SICK JOKE

SEETHING CU NT DO ONE YA BITCH

My jaw hit the floor when they announced that **** He dominated from start to finish..Bradley won one round

dats unreal

This is a total joke.
Just cannot believe it.

I gonna ask those judges to refund my losses

one round do me a favour. It's hard to make a case for him winning sure but he was certainly in the fight.

worst decision i have ever seen and that includes frank warren cards

How can judges see it so different ? Why do they make so many mistakes.

Ive seen some dodgy decisions in my time but that one takes the biscuit!  How do they get away with it?   Rematch my arse

I have got to say it is a complete shambles of a decision.

Theres not alot I can say to that,Manny had some decisions he should NOT have won against Marquez 3 times tho.

He looked as sharp as ever Manny the Floyd fight may just happen now

thats outragous. i layed my stake back at 1.03 did he hit 1.01?

Manny took him to school ffs

i suddenly dont feel tired no. wen i hear 115-113 i thaught bradley cudnt have got that close but to see him win on 2 cards is just baffling

The Bhoys
10 Jun 12 06:17
Joined:
18 May 08
| Topic/replies: 20,227 | Blogger: The Bhoys's blog
i suddenly dont feel tired no. wen i hear 115-113 i thaught bradley cudnt have got that close but to see him win on 2 cards is just baffling

Yes, it touched 1.01
This really hurts.
Must have lost my garden shed, my lawnmower, dog and cat.
I am going on a holiday. Screw boxing

jesus mate hard luck i layed stake back at 1.03 thank god i did but did not see that happening

i never saw the match, nfi what was happening


thought pre match bradley might be odds, laid 100 at 1.05/1.06 less than an hour ago

looked at odds movement come in to 1.03 1.04 approx so thought manny must be winning going the distance

didn't know the result as searching for manny on the web

couldn't get a result

thought hell, check my profit/loss and very surprised in profit,

then searched for bradley on web, gotta admit with the prices i thought i was looking at a knockout.

should i quit boxing betting in front??

^^^ YES

Even Bradleys manager scored this 8-4 in favour of Pac..All 3 judges from Nevada also, Coco the clown, mickey mouse & stevie fking wonder

Like a mug I pounded it at 1.04 for "free money" and lost a month's worth of football profits just like that. Not the greatest decision on my part even if I'd won, but what a way to lose. Agree with OP, there is no way I'm ever going near boxing again.

Poetic justice.  Pac easily won the fight but was robbed of a decision - maybe now he knows how JMM feels after being so blatnatly turned over against the judges against pac last time out.  Bent judging went for pac last time, and against him this time.

so blatantly turned over by the judges*

what price did the draw hit,backed it @ 46,put a lay @ 11 which wasnt matched,just shows that it couldent have been a close fight.

Don't you think the 1.01 showed that book

Alot of pocket talk on this thread..

i backed Bradley , but went to bed during round 10 as I gave him no hope what so ever. Happy to win the money, but really a ridiculous decision. In this day and age and the money involved , and they can still rig the results

still astonished by that decision. thank god i layed out at 1.03 or i really would have been seething

I'm just watching this now. Just through 5 rounds, manny has won every one imo, Bradley might of drawn the second round

if that's the last we hear from you it was a great decision you seething mess

Agree with Premier, if this is what it takes for that cretin to depart this forum then its a belting decision.

I had 116-114 Pacman.

It was a lot closer fight than people are making out. Bradley won the first round and had success in the last 5 rounds so it wasnt the shutout that people are claiming. I would struggle to give Bradley enough rounds to win but i think 'robbery' and 'worst decision ever' comments are very wide of the mark.

Very biased commentary aswell didnt help.

Did he hell win the first round. Won 3 rounds max and thats being generous

i didn't watch the fight, but surely bradley gave the judges something to think about if he got the decision. Put it this way if manny totally dominated like people say, which i could see, he wouldn't have lost. Put it this way, Mayweather would beat both pacquiao and bradley hands down. Who ever disagrees, please tell me why ?

Bradley won the first round for me. Was close for sure but thought Bradley outworked him that first round. Pacman won about 6 rounds clearly and the others could be contentious depending on how you score. I thought the 115-113 Pacman that one judge had was about right. It was a poor decision but think robbery is perhaps a bit strong.

The biased commentary i think has a lot to answer for. Amir Khan was a complete joke.

What has Khan said?

Just his general commentary.

''i think manny would beat floyd because he's my friend''

''bradley ducked me and i can see why on this performance''

''manny won every round'' and then ''i scored it 8-4''

ect ect

Yeah he's a tool thats for sure