|
By:
I think BBC that with a mare like Soviet Song it's pretty crucial to do the best by them regardless of where one imagines they 'fit' in terms of quality level.
Although I have only limited knowledge of her, she sadly is heading into disaster territory from what I know. Perhaps Elite have bought into the idea that American vets can sort out all problems. I am not sure it would occur to me to cart her over there, but I suppose you can't blame them for wanting to try and change their luck. Speightstown is a useful stallion and I daresay there are pedigree affinities - or at least you would hope so! |
|
By:
PM thanks for your reply-you obviously have an insight into Soviet Songs many issues.
Obviously with such an extremely valuable mare and breeding prospect, Elite are hoping that a trip over the Atlantic to some expert veterinary care can enable her to be more receptive to a successful covering. You would hope that there are breeding affinities in this cross, but I had hoped for a more 'Hollywood' stallion. Her only progeny to date is a 3 year old by Oasis Dream, and previously she has attempted to be mated with Montjeu and Galileo, as well as back to Oasis Dream. I know these animals are not exactly cheap coverings, but the old adage of breeding the best to the best is not a bad starting point? |
|
By:
Ofcourse it's not a bad place to start - indeed that is where they started!
I fear that with the very best stallions being pretty scarily under pressure in the stud season - I overheard Galileo's days mates being juggled last season, enlightening! - a mare with Soviet Song's record perhaps isn't going to be welcome at the trendiest stallion's harems sadly. |
|
By:
Thats interesting what you say PM, about the potential attitude of stallion masters to mare's who don't always get in foal. Even more so considering that the mare had a very late and very speculative covering by Oasis Dream last year when there was 'not a cats chance in hell' of her conceiving, according to someone apparently close to the horses mouth.
I am surprised to hear this, because if your stallion doesn't get a mare like Soviet Song in foal, it is so easy to blame the mare ('not my boy guv, look at her stud record'). And if your boy does succeed, then more kudos to him, and if the progeny turns out to be any good, then it's potentially a nice rise in the fee for next year? A win/win situation? Elites breeding programme has punched well above it's weight (Soviet Song, Penzance, Eisteddfod, Border Patrol and Dandino are all HOME BRED Group/Graded winners) from only 10 mares. They have also not been shy in using top and expensive stallions (Oasis Dream, Dansili, Galileo, Montjeu, Giants Causeway), so its even more surprising that our top mare is going to a stalion like Speightstown. I suspect that there may be more to this than meets the eye, but I just can't help thinking that Sheikh Mo or The Coolmore gang wouldn't be sending their top mare(s) to a stallion like Speightstown? |
|
By:
Speightstown is a serious stallion and at 50k plus the trip that equates to going to Oasis Dream / Dansili / Dubawi. He also gets turf horses which isnt true of lots of the best US sires. Winstar / Taylor Made are as good as it get in the horse care world so thats got to be a factor in thinking they can make a foal. Coolmore breed purely to a stallion enhancement / creation strategy so no comparison, Sheik Mo / Maktoum use all sorts of US sires
|
|
By:
I don't know quite how much sense I talk, as ever, BBC, but it is a fact that the top stallions are incredibly busy and they really do struggle to get all the mares covered, particularly if they hit a sub fertile blip. If I ran the stallion and was looking at 80 to 300k for a pregnancy, then if there was a queue Soviet Song would be at the far end of it, either in her heat period or sooner than that when bookings are being taken. And at 12 yrs of age with only one unraced offspring Soviet Song is very unlikely to be a fee altering progenitor I fear.
As a mare owner I would be aware of that, so maybe keeping her in slightly less exhalted company enhances her prospects at still being taken seriously. If a stallion really suits, then his fee is sort of irrelevant. |
|
By:
Fair points yer ma. I would have personally been delighted with any of the 3 stallions you mention instead of Speightstown.
Like I said earlier, the Elite breeding programme has punched well above it's weight, and that is down in large part to those who decide the stallions for the mares. There have been some inspired decisions in the past (someone once sent Kalinka to Marju and out popped Soviet Song, after all) so lets hope I am eating my words in 3 years time, and thanking my lucky stars someone chose Speightstown. |
|
By:
Yes, of course PM, I failed to consider the no fee for a barren mare after covering. Like you say, why would they bother with Soviet Song when they can have another top class mare with a 100% pregnancy rate, and an almost certain fee for their stallions services.
|
|
By:
Just curious have you actually researched anything about Speightstown before you started knocking him! A quick glance would show you he was 7th on the US 2011 General Sire list with over 7 million in prizemoney. Coolmore raced and currently stand one of his sons in Munnings, Darley have also raced some of his offspring and from the limited runners he has had over here he has Group 1 winner in Lord Shanakill and a son of his won the Norfolk just last flat season.
|
|
By:
Absolutely JMC, I have seen Speightstowns figures, and he is a very good stallion. I am aware that Lord Shanakill and Bapak Chinta are probably his best known sons over in the UK-I wasn't aware of the Coolmore connection so thanks for pointing that out.
However, based on previous experience of Elite's choice of stallions for their best mares, I was expecting a covering from the likes of Oasis Dream, Giants Causeway, Dansili, Dubawi and dare I say it even Galileo or Montjeu. However, I had not thought out some of the points raised by PM concerning Soviet Songs lack of fertility and how that would impact on any potential stallion (multiple coverings when they are under pressure to get their mares covered anyway). Many thanks gents for educating me on such matters. I am an enthusiastic follower of breeding and bloodlines, but maybe not as worldly wise to the ins and outs of the game as some of you are. |
|
By:
I came across quiet sharp there but I didnt mean it to be that way.
Looking at True Nicks the match of Speightstown and Soviet Song rates a B+ so maybe there is method in the madness of the selection http://truenicks.com/free-reports/hypothetical-mating/display?stallionReferenceNumber=4434181&mareReferenceNumber=5686360&sroMode=True&mareName=Soviet%20Song%20(IRE) |
|
By:
JMC-no offence taken at all. In fact I am grateful that you took the time to answer.
Thanks also for the URL. Like I said earlier, someone at Elite knows far better about choosing stallions for our mares than I do (The Racing Manager has a big say in the mating plans I am told) and since his matings have produced quite a few group/listed horses, then I should really stop moaning and see what happens! |
|
By:
Speightstown is a good stallion but my first thought was..why so much effort ?
If you want something outside the usual Danehill/Sadlers Wells axis, you've got stallions like Dubawi and Invincible Spirit on your doorstep, relatively speaking. |
|
By:
BSB-Soviet Song is already in the US so it's not so much effort in this case.
JMC - I had a look at that site, and my proposed cross with Dubawi only resulted in a D (shows what a breeding genius I am). However, both Giant's Causeway and Shamardal (another stallion Elite have used) both gave A+ ratings. |
|
By:
Best of luck with all that BBC (you should consider a name change).
By the way, if the Speightstown colt succeeds and is a quadruple Group One winner over a mile here, what happens next? |
|
By:
RoyalAcademy - Well assuming she gets in foal, and it's a colt, and he wins 4 group ones......
Then he hopefully goes off to stud for about £10K a cover (Oct 1st terms?)and Elite get all the money to invest into the business (or invest at least some of it). I presume you are wondering if we members get any of the stud fees, should we have a stallion. Unfortunately not as far as Im aware. We have not yet had one good enough to be a stallion, and we all live in hope that Soviet Songs 3 yo colt (Soviet Dream) is good enough to break our duck on the stallion front. |
|
By:
Thanks for that BBC. As you might guess I'm a little skeptical about the whole set-up. The owners are building a wealthy bloodstock bank while the annual members' (training) renewals continue to flood in to fund the risk i.e. training fees.
If you do produce a stallion, as there is no accountability there is no guarantee whatsoever that all or any of the income from his loins will be to the club's benefit-they might even get an offer to sell they can't refuse. (The "poor" Royal Ascot Racing Club members encountered something similar). A cynic might suggest that it's in the shareholders' interest to have three or four crap years, discouraging renewals and then sail off into the sunset after a dispersal. Nice gig. |
|
By:
RA-Interesting viewpoint!
I am a member of many years standing with my loyalty bonus and share of the prizemoney, I pay just over £100 a year. For that I get a hair in about 15-20 horses in training. I get a weekly newsletter (48 weeks a year, good quality full colour, glossy paper, very professional production). I also get info regarding runners and their winning chances. Organised stable visits, hospitality events, the odd free DVD (they did rather a good one about Soviet Songs career just after she retired). As far as bloodstock goes, they breed to race, and to . They were offered £1M plus for Soviet Song at the end of her 2 yo career (easy money for a home bred), and then again before her 4yo season (the members were consulted and 80% wanted to keep her so she stayed and won 3 Group 1's that year!) They also turned down £1M plus for Dandino. I agree, if they wanted to sell all of the bloodstock, there would be sod all I could do about it. and frankly, if Soviet Dream turns out to be the second coming, wins more G1's than Frankel, and goes off to stud for £100K a covering, then would I be upset that I didn't see a brass farthing of it? No, because I don't think that my £100 a year entitles me to anything more than I already get, certainly not a share of the stud fees. |
|
By:
It's inexpensive, good value and an excellent business model.
I'd say the American jaunt will be doomed but you never know. gl |
|
By:
Interestingly RA, the business model is better served by the club having a 'superstr' horse in it's ranks. When Soviet Song won the fillies mile and was joint winter favourite for the 1000 ****s, membership rose from about 12-18000, eveybody wanting to 'own' a piece of a potential superstar.
Currently, we have a horse in Dandino, who is short of top class on the flat. In an attempt to make him a 'superstar', they first tried to make him into a Cup horse (breeding is Dansili, a miler, out of a 10F winner by Generous). Strangely enough, he didnt stay 2M on the flat. Someone then had the bright idea of turning him into a star hurdler (Dansili doesnt get many top hurdlers, especially those who dont stay and need fast ground). fortuately, Dan had one look at hurdles (or one school over) and decided he didn't fancy it. Sensible chap. He was probably bemused how he even got to see a hurdle when he finished 7L behind an Arc winner, and 6L behing a Breeders Cup winner in races not run to suit him earlier in the year. Personally, I think Dandino can win more group races on the flat-maybe not a G1 in this country, but maybe some more G2's and G3's, and possibly a German/Italian G1. Doesn't seem all that bad to me, plenty of prize money to be won as well, but it probably won't make him the superstar that is needed for the business model. As for the American jaunt, I am not a vet but I have some professional knowledge regarding the type of isues Soviet Song suffers from (medically)-the latest reports seem much more encouraging, which hopefully means we can get our Speightstown colt and those 4 G1's you talked about...... |
|
By:
As far as I can see, Elite are depending on mostly home-breds to produce flat winners. Ffestiniog (95 Efisio) and Kalinka (94 Soviet Star) crop up as foundation mares all the time.
In another life a much older colleague of mine was close to the great MV O'Brien who believed that home-breeding programmes alone were not sufficient to guarantee success in Ballydoyle. This would be especially true perhaps of Elite where the mares have modest enough pedigrees albeit that they have been extremely successful and proficient at producing winners. The Aga Khan, Khaled Abdullah and Lord Weinstock (RIP) are/were the exceptions to this rule thanks to mares with pedigrees of outstanding brilliance and longevity but I would guess that Elite would have to splash the cash to increase the chances of the next Soviet Song and the next "superstar". Even Ballydoyle are huge buyers of yearlings every year and they have a wonderful global broodmare band across all their operations. A horse such as Dandino racing in Italy or Germany is unlikely to thrill Elite's members if this is where he has to go to rekindle his career. |
|
By:
You are quite right that most of our mares are daughters of KALINKA (Soviet Song, Affinity, Kalinova and Sister Act) and FFESTINIOG (Oceans Apart) and they have been excellent foundation mares with pretty outstanding records.
I agree that the breeding programme needs greater diversity (we cant all have a HASILI in our broodmare band, can we!?) We do have a purchased mare CHINA TEA (HIGH CHAPPARAL-MOLASSES) who is a full sister to the useful french colt MAGADAN-she has a yearling by HALLING and is in foal to DUKE OF MARMALADE. She has a nice pedigree and hopefully could produce us a very nice middle distance horse. We recently sold another bought filly SINFONIA (by SINDAR) from an Aga Khan family. Personally I was very disappointed that the filly was sold and not added to the breeding programme (not deemed to be good enough quality based on a single run as a 2 yo). She was a horse that Sir Henry Cecil liked, but could not stand training. I think she might have definately added a different dimension to the rather limited Elite gene pool. The most exciting young mares we potentially have, however are AFFINITY (SADLERS WELLS-KALINKA) who has just produced a filly foal by MARJU (hence very closely related to Soviet Song). And finally SISTER ACT, who is a full sister to Soviet Song, who produced a quality colt by OASIS DREAM (who unfortunately was lost on the gallops) and has another quality 2yo this year called RIBBONS (by MANDURO) who is in training with James Fanshawe. I think she might be the daughte of KALINKA who replaces her mother as another top mare for the club, based on her two progeny to date, but of course, she doesn't add to the genetic diversity in the broodmare band. So I am in total agreement that the club would be well served by some other bloodlines, but to be absolutely fair to Elite, we have a very good record of breeding some quality animals from a pretty small band of broodmares. |
|
By:
If Soviet Song was mine with her very poor record as a breeding prospect I think I'd forget sending her to anything expensive as like Pot M suggests doubt they'd really want such a tricky mare on there books.I'd go for something that's not as popular so wont be pressed on book sizes and therefore number of covers,a drop down in grade would mean a mare like SS would be a scoop so they would try their utmost to get her in foal.But obviously you'd still want something with ability that will race.For me a horse like very tough Firebreak who has shown from dross he can get a top class runner and also he can get something that can run regularly in decent races which should at least give her multi owners some fun.With her shocking breeding record she's fast becoming a major disappointment.
|
|
By:
PD thanks for your comments. Soviet Song's poor breeding record is due not only to her well documented problems in conceiving, but maybe also due to the length of her career. Would you or anyone else have any opinions on this-I can see the thought, she was in training from 2-6 years old-most mares are usually off to the paddocks at 3 or 4?
Thanks BBC. |
|
By:
I'd assume yes that's a highly likely scenario with her going on and on......and on,as you may know mares kept in training for too long can become very hard to get in foal.
I myself once had a very good runner who went on for too long she didn't get in foal for 2 years so we gave her another year off doing nothing with her at all just letting nature take its course,it did work as the next time of asking she went straight in foal and from then on was a regular breeder.I have recently been wondering if Goldikova may suffer the same situation as Soviet Song has to date.I think with this sort you need endless patience or they can be enough to drive you to drink!Good luck with her BBC. |
|
By:
Thanks PD. I am pleased to say that the latest medical bulletin on Soviet Song is highly encouraging for her having a successful covering this year (or at least, her chances now are as good as they have been for a couple of years).
Like yourself, I do wonder about how Goldikova gets on this year at stud. I hope for her owners that she doesn't have the same problems as our mare. Funnily enough, the chances of a really top mare producing some top class offspring seems to be not that great. There are some notable exceptions (MIESQUE being one) of course. I had the pleasure of a brief chat with a lady who used to look after ALlEGRETA when she was in training. She was of course the dam of URBAN SEA, who in turn was the dam of GALILEO and BLACK SAM BELLAMY (I believe). Her contention was that the very best producing dams are rarely the real top class racemares. The first four home in the 2003 1000 Guineas (Russian Rhythm, Six Perfections, Intercontinental and Soviet Song) were all exceptional fillies who won multiple Group ones including Breeders Cup races, and beating colts in the process. And none of them have produced a Group 1 winner as yet as far as I know ( last time I looked). |
|
By:
I think BBc that as these great race mares have such a high profile it is easy to get hung up on their failures at stud by dint of the extensive reporting of them. However any study made will prove quite categorically that they have considerably better records at stud than the general population. Your example does not read well for sure, but then again microscopically few broodies produce Gp 1 winners anyway. The difference between the mega stars is difficult to assess from race to race or season to season so there might be only a few lengths between them and the merely useful fillies on the track also.
Flame of Tara, Urban Sea, Dahlia, Time Charter, Miesque, Slightly Dangerous spring to mind immediately. Good at both jobs. |
|
By:
Big Black Cat,What's the situation with Soviet Song?Is there no chance?If so what's going to happen to her will she go back to the UK or stay in the states?Lots of questions I know.
![]() |
|
By:
PD- this is how I understand the situation at present.
SOVIET SONG came into season last month, but (in veterinary terms) she only put up one follicle so wasn't covered. They are hoping to cover her when she next comes into season (any time now I understand). There has been no information on what will happen to the mare whether she's in foal, barren or whatever. Elite do keep another broodmare in the US, and her progeny so far have remained in the US until they are yearlings, and then come over to the UK to go into training as 2 year old. As I mentioned earlier in the thread, she went to the US for specialist veterinary treatment to eradicate the problems she has conceiving. This appears to have been successful and everyone is hoping for a positive outcome. I would be surprised if she stayed in the US even if she remained barren, but I don't honestly know what they are planning. |
|
By:
I see,I was asking because I noticed a piece on the Racing Post site yesterday which described Soviet Song as
" Soviet Song, a five-time Group 1 winner who has been retired from broodmare duties," But after reading it again perhaps they are talking about Sister Act her sister but as she's only 8 and is in-foal to New Approach it seems unusual to say the least unless of course the whole family is plagued with fertility problems.Anyway lets hope sending her to the U.S. does pay-off and you get her back in-foal. |
|
By:
I was wondering why you were asking the question PD-now I know.
If SOVIET SONG has been retired from duties as a broodmare, this hasn't been announced to the members. That doesn't mean it's not true of course. They are very keen to get her in foal for obvious reasons, but there does come a time when you have to say 'enough is enough' and leave the old girl to enjoy her retirement. She obviously owes us absolutely nothing, and her wellbeing is absolutely paramount as far as I'm concerned. If it is the end for her then we have lots of tremendous memories, not the least of those being her five group ones. The day she beat ATTRACTION for her first Falmouth Stakes win will live long in the memory for me, especially as she had had a relatively troubled 3 yo old career, and some setbacks at the start of that 4 yo season. I am very excited about SISTER ACT's covering, as her first foal by OASIS DREAM was a real quality colt (sadly died on HRA Cecil's gallops one morning) and her 2 yo by MANDURO is another similar quality filly (so I am told by many more knowledgeable people than myself). I am hoping that she can take on the baton from KALINKA (her and SS's dam) and lead the broodmare band on into the next generation. Cheers BBC |
|
By:
BBC and PD. When I got to the end of that article to see that Kirtlington Stud was in Newmarket I decided that it had been written by a 12 yo niece/nephew of one of the equally useless experts who ply their trade on there. At the end I decided that perhaps they were talking about the retirement of the dam of Soviet Star et al.
Let us know when you get the definitive BBC |
|
By:
Pot M,However many times I read that article I still none the wiser.I'm still confused as to which mare they are on about,so I've come to the same conclusion as you..........a 12 year old sounds about right.Thinking about it mind perhaps the Racing Post have recently had a bus load of school children all submitting fanciful articles for publication under the banner of 'work experience'clearly they haven't done their homework.....that goes for the editor as well!!!The old saying 'get your facts right'springs to mind.Sorry to hear about the mare twinning has she since been re-scanned?
|
|
By:
Latest News- SOVIET SONG was not covered this month as her swab came back with a positive culture. She has been treated and they remain hopeful that she will be covered on her next heat cycle.
NO talk of retirement, however, and still hopeful of a successful covering. Its the hope I can't stand. Thanks for your interest and thoughts. BBC |
|
By:
BBC two beautiful pictures of Soviet Song and her Oasis Dream colt are in the link below I saw these pictures on the RP comments on the death of Montjeu some beautiful snaps on the pages especially the one of Yeats
http://www.flickr.com/photos/41603621@N08/sets/72157622212462901/detail/?page=3 |
|
By:
Thanks for the link jmc. I had not seen those photos before. Of course, the foal is now a 3yo called SOVIET DREAM in training with James Fanshawe.
As for SOVIET SONG, she was due to be covered last Wednesday, and had put up 3 follicles (all good). However, there has been no confirmation that she was covered from the club, which probably means that she wasn't (all bad). No news is no news, as they say. Thanks BBC |
|
By:
SOVIET SONG was covered by SPEIGHTSTOW on Wednesday. Needless to say, there are may sets of fingers being crossed until her scan in about 2 weeks time.
|
|
By:
That's SPEIGHTSTOWN, of course.
|
|
By:
That's good news BBC. I can't remember but you probably told us, does she conceive easily when she is finally clean enough to cover?
|