Had a think about this last night, under normal circumstances assuming 100k votes Rachel would get 50k dave 28 k and JJ 22k in line with polls and figgies voting figs. So it boils down to how many people picked up the the phone and voted for JJ last night. If it was 1% of viewers thats 20kish votes and hes probably safe but anything more than 1.5% and hes in trouble. My wife who doesnt normally vote voted for him I think hes in trouble.
Had a think about this last night, under normal circumstances assuming 100k votes Rachel would get 50k dave 28 k and JJ 22k in line with polls and figgies voting figs. So it boils down to how many people picked up the the phone and voted for JJ last
I think 100k is a high estimate Topper. I'd go for something like 60k. And I guess we need to figure out what percentage of overall eviction votes are cast on a Friday – presumably a higher percentage. Whereas the initial burst of votes would have been tweenies voting out Rachel, the highlights viewer, after last night, would have been voting out JJ. If it is getting around 2 million viewers now, we need to work out what a realistic percentage of those might have picked up the phone but I'd imagine the call volume was far greater after last night for JJ than the initial tweenie effect.
I think 100k is a high estimate Topper. I'd go for something like 60k. And I guess we need to figure out what percentage of overall eviction votes are cast on a Friday – presumably a higher percentage. Whereas the initial burst of votes would
Its a pure lottery trying to work it out, you also have to factor in the casual highlights voter who will vote once and the tweenie nutter who will vote double digits.
Its a pure lottery trying to work it out, you also have to factor in the casual highlights voter who will vote once and the tweenie nutter who will vote double digits.