Australian
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
BREAKING
OCTOBER 29 2016 - 6:48AM
SAVE
PRINT
A criminal at the highest level
FBI announces it will review more emails in Hillary Clinton case, reportedly linked to Anthony Weiner probe
Washington: The FBI says it will investigate additional emails related to Hillary Clinton's use of a private email system, which were discovered after the bureau seized devices belonging to Mrs Clinton's senior aide Huma Abedin, and her estranged husband, Anthony Weiner, according to media reports.
Lets see her smiling clowns face laugh this down
OCTOBER 29 2016 - 6:48AM
SAVE
A criminal at the highest level
FBI announces it will review more emails in Hillary Clinton case, reportedly linked to Anthony Weiner probe
Washington: The FBI says it will investigate additional emails related to Hillary Clinton's use of a private email system, which were discovered after the bureau seized devices belonging to Mrs Clinton's senior aide Huma Abedin, and her estranged husband, Anthony Weiner, according to media reports.
Lets see her smiling clowns face laugh this down
Show More
Yanks are a bit sensitive, noticed announces in time for the weekend, Mid West Baptist Bible bashers will be incensed! Remember what happened when Janet Jackson flashed a nipple?
They've had years to put this b1tch in jail (gaol?).
What price, (say 2 years ago or 4 years ago, I dunno), we would see 2 candidates whose main platform is deceit ? Not paying any taxes is a rort - maybe not ? and them there's the emails .............
The average person couldn't even tell you what an email server is, she's a workaholic and took home work from the office.
I'm sure none of you lot has never taken anything confidential home from work if you still need to do some work.
Not much more than high level gossip, no one's lives were endangered, republican idiots have spent millions upon millions investigating her for years and years and what a surprise it's proven to be a total waste of taxpayers money. Hillary's far from perfect but she's a veritable angle compared to Trump, Bernie will be the best president they'll never have.
The uneven distribution of wealth over there is obscene, it makes you want to cry, ahving recently seen it first hand for ourselvesm but despite all this most people we spoke to were happy.
The country's hardly hanging by a thread as Trump would have everyone believe, hard to understand how some of his supporters and republicans can bear to look at themselves in the mirror given their reprehensible actions and disgusting lies.
Trump's been bankrupt numerous times and almost certainly been propped up by the russians for years, doesn't pay people for their work and is a sexist, chauvinistic, xenophobic, low life who has only ever looked after himself and all these low wage earners and middle class inbred idiots suddenly think he's going to be their champion, now that's funny.
Not to mention he's managed to lose a shiiitload of money on casinos, yep he's a genius businessman alright.
He's arguably exhibit A for why humanity is totally fuuucked
I'm sure none of you lot has never taken anything confidential home from work if you still need to do some work.
Not much more than high level gossip, no one's lives were endangered, republican idiots have spent millions upon millions investigating her for years and years and what a surprise it's proven to be a total waste of taxpayers money. Hillary's far from perfect but she's a veritable angle compared to Trump, Bernie will be the best president they'll never have.
The uneven distribution of wealth over there is obscene, it makes you want to cry, ahving recently seen it first hand for ourselvesm but despite all this most people we spoke to were happy.
The country's hardly hanging by a thread as Trump would have everyone believe, hard to understand how some of his supporters and republicans can bear to look at themselves in the mirror given their reprehensible actions and disgusting lies.
Trump's been bankrupt numerous times and almost certainly been propped up by the russians for years, doesn't pay people for their work and is a sexist, chauvinistic, xenophobic, low life who has only ever looked after himself and all these low wage earners and middle class inbred idiots suddenly think he's going to be their champion, now that's funny.
Not to mention he's managed to lose a shiiitload of money on casinos, yep he's a genius businessman alright.
He's arguably exhibit A for why humanity is totally fuuucked
Clinton’s use of her own computer server (installed in the basement of her New York home) to send and receive emails while serving as Secretary was well known to close aides but kept hidden from the public until 26 months after her departure. Although it has clearly undermined her political standing, she resisted calling the decision a mistake, according to private emails among her aides in 2015 that were leaked in October.
Three controversies surround her decision:
1) Clinton was able to maintain personal control over a trove of records normally considered public property, despite regulations and federal laws that demand emails be officially maintained to preserve a historical record and ensure officeholders are held accountable.
In this case, Clinton purged 32,000 of her emails before turning another 30,000 over to the State Department, which sought them to comply with a congressional demand. She said the discarded ones contained personal information not pertinent to her work. Trump said at the third debate that the email destruction (in early March 2015) occurred after she got a congressional subpoena for them, amounting to a criminal act. But Clinton’s aides say they actually ordered the destruction three months earlier; the fact that it was actually carried out two weeks after the subpoena was issued was accidental, not deliberate, they said.
In any event, the vetting of the now-discarded emails was done by Clinton’s longtime loyalists and no independent reviewers saw them first. So the public has no way to know for sure if her actions were appropriate or not. Even law enforcement officials seem worried that they didn’t see everything relevant to their inquiry into what Clinton did – as evidenced by the FBI’s startling Oct. 28 announcement that it was still probing the matter.
2) The use of the private server may have made her communications less secure, and therefore compromised U.S. intelligence information, according to the FBI. After a lengthy probe, FBI director James Comey said “we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access” to Clinton’s emails, which he said included seven email chains incorporating information that should have been classified Top Secret/Special Access, one of the highest levels.
3) Clinton has made statements about the emails and the server that turned out not to be true. She said, for example, that none included classified information, but intelligence officials – including former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morell — said some contained information that should have been treated as highly classified.
They weren’t clearly marked as such in Clinton’s copies, and she has said she did not understand that paragraphs marked with a “C” were supposed to be considered “confidential.” But many intelligence professionals privately express skepticism about about this claim, arguing that Clinton would have regularly seen classified documents that incorporated such “portion” markings. And some FBI and State Department officials bristled – and resisted — when a longtime Clinton loyalist at the State Department, Patrick Kennedy, attempted last year to persuade the FBI that some of the emails deemed “classified” in retrospect should not be marked that way.
Is the criticism of Clinton fair? Did she know that mishandling her communications posed security risks?
Everyone at the State Department had reason to be vigilant about cybersecurity, given that the theft and leak of 250,000 of its diplomatic cables (by the U.S. defense intelligence analyst then known as Bradley Manning) occurred in 2010, a year after Clinton took office. Clinton notably said in an April 2014 speech at the University of Connecticut – a year after leaving office — that “at the State Department, we were attacked every hour, more than once an hour by incoming efforts to penetrate everything we had…When I would go to China, or I would go to Russia, we would leave all of our electronic equipment on the plane, with the batteries out, because this is a new frontier. And they’re trying to [go]…after the personal emails of people who worked in the State Department.”
But State’s own auditors said the issue did not get adequate attention under her watch: In late 2013, the inspector general warned that the department’s computer systems still had “control weaknesses” that could lead to security breaches. Comey said at one point that the FBI “developed evidence that the security culture of the State Department in general, and with respect to use of unclassified e-mail systems in particular, was generally lacking.”
Clinton has said she wasn’t told that routing her emails through a personal server was a problem, and that she didn’t see an all-hands-on-deck warning sent to all State Department officials – under her own name – in June 2011 that said, don’t use personal email accounts for official business because they’re not secure. She also said she initially didn’t know that she wasn’t supposed to bring her personal Blackberry – a potential listening device for foreign spies — into her office suite, where she regularly stored it in a desk drawer.
Doesn’t this indicate a startlingly casual approach to an important matter? And what about everybody else? How could she have communicated with others in the administration without them knowing about the irregular pathway those emails took?
The FBI probe makes clear that other top officials in the Obama administration – including the president himself, his national security adviser, and former CENTCOM commander and CIA chief David Petraeus – were aware that Clinton regularly used a personal email address (Petraeus sent roughly a thousand emails to it). But they have said they didn’t know she used a personal server.
Clinton has said the server was installed purely as a matter of convenience – that she wanted to keep using one smartphone for both personal and official business, without making her exchanges with friends and family “accessible to the State Department.” But wasn’t her real motive simply to put her emails outside of the reach of Freedom of Information Act laws that apply to such records?
Three controversies surround her decision:
1) Clinton was able to maintain personal control over a trove of records normally considered public property, despite regulations and federal laws that demand emails be officially maintained to preserve a historical record and ensure officeholders are held accountable.
In this case, Clinton purged 32,000 of her emails before turning another 30,000 over to the State Department, which sought them to comply with a congressional demand. She said the discarded ones contained personal information not pertinent to her work. Trump said at the third debate that the email destruction (in early March 2015) occurred after she got a congressional subpoena for them, amounting to a criminal act. But Clinton’s aides say they actually ordered the destruction three months earlier; the fact that it was actually carried out two weeks after the subpoena was issued was accidental, not deliberate, they said.
In any event, the vetting of the now-discarded emails was done by Clinton’s longtime loyalists and no independent reviewers saw them first. So the public has no way to know for sure if her actions were appropriate or not. Even law enforcement officials seem worried that they didn’t see everything relevant to their inquiry into what Clinton did – as evidenced by the FBI’s startling Oct. 28 announcement that it was still probing the matter.
2) The use of the private server may have made her communications less secure, and therefore compromised U.S. intelligence information, according to the FBI. After a lengthy probe, FBI director James Comey said “we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access” to Clinton’s emails, which he said included seven email chains incorporating information that should have been classified Top Secret/Special Access, one of the highest levels.
3) Clinton has made statements about the emails and the server that turned out not to be true. She said, for example, that none included classified information, but intelligence officials – including former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morell — said some contained information that should have been treated as highly classified.
They weren’t clearly marked as such in Clinton’s copies, and she has said she did not understand that paragraphs marked with a “C” were supposed to be considered “confidential.” But many intelligence professionals privately express skepticism about about this claim, arguing that Clinton would have regularly seen classified documents that incorporated such “portion” markings. And some FBI and State Department officials bristled – and resisted — when a longtime Clinton loyalist at the State Department, Patrick Kennedy, attempted last year to persuade the FBI that some of the emails deemed “classified” in retrospect should not be marked that way.
Is the criticism of Clinton fair? Did she know that mishandling her communications posed security risks?
Everyone at the State Department had reason to be vigilant about cybersecurity, given that the theft and leak of 250,000 of its diplomatic cables (by the U.S. defense intelligence analyst then known as Bradley Manning) occurred in 2010, a year after Clinton took office. Clinton notably said in an April 2014 speech at the University of Connecticut – a year after leaving office — that “at the State Department, we were attacked every hour, more than once an hour by incoming efforts to penetrate everything we had…When I would go to China, or I would go to Russia, we would leave all of our electronic equipment on the plane, with the batteries out, because this is a new frontier. And they’re trying to [go]…after the personal emails of people who worked in the State Department.”
But State’s own auditors said the issue did not get adequate attention under her watch: In late 2013, the inspector general warned that the department’s computer systems still had “control weaknesses” that could lead to security breaches. Comey said at one point that the FBI “developed evidence that the security culture of the State Department in general, and with respect to use of unclassified e-mail systems in particular, was generally lacking.”
Clinton has said she wasn’t told that routing her emails through a personal server was a problem, and that she didn’t see an all-hands-on-deck warning sent to all State Department officials – under her own name – in June 2011 that said, don’t use personal email accounts for official business because they’re not secure. She also said she initially didn’t know that she wasn’t supposed to bring her personal Blackberry – a potential listening device for foreign spies — into her office suite, where she regularly stored it in a desk drawer.
Doesn’t this indicate a startlingly casual approach to an important matter? And what about everybody else? How could she have communicated with others in the administration without them knowing about the irregular pathway those emails took?
The FBI probe makes clear that other top officials in the Obama administration – including the president himself, his national security adviser, and former CENTCOM commander and CIA chief David Petraeus – were aware that Clinton regularly used a personal email address (Petraeus sent roughly a thousand emails to it). But they have said they didn’t know she used a personal server.
Clinton has said the server was installed purely as a matter of convenience – that she wanted to keep using one smartphone for both personal and official business, without making her exchanges with friends and family “accessible to the State Department.” But wasn’t her real motive simply to put her emails outside of the reach of Freedom of Information Act laws that apply to such records?
Who gives a shiiit about emails, you only need to know two reason why trump is a complete and utter moron, he has to be told three times why it's a bad idea to use nuclear weapons and secondly he thinks women should be punished for having an abortion, both statements came out of his own mouth, not to mention he's a massive fuuucking pervert.
Hillary has worked her whole adult life to help others in some form or another, Trump worked soley to benefit the only person that matter in his mind himself.
Hillary's far from perfect but how is this even a ****g choice???
If a lie is repeated ad infinitum and you continue to stick to that narrative there's enough ****g morons out there who will swallow it hook line and sinker.
Talk about hypocritical, how do these evangelical voters just turn a blind eye to Trump's in long ;ist of infidelities, multiple divorces etc and the never ending stream of sexual abuse allegations against him.
He's not a fit and proper person to be a school bus driver let alone President, how do they reconcile their beliefs with his actions???
I can't stand fuuucking hypocrites and they're hypocrites of the highest order.
America is facing the world biggest IQ test and if they elect Trump they'll have failed it miserably.
Hillary has worked her whole adult life to help others in some form or another, Trump worked soley to benefit the only person that matter in his mind himself.
Hillary's far from perfect but how is this even a ****g choice???
If a lie is repeated ad infinitum and you continue to stick to that narrative there's enough ****g morons out there who will swallow it hook line and sinker.
Talk about hypocritical, how do these evangelical voters just turn a blind eye to Trump's in long ;ist of infidelities, multiple divorces etc and the never ending stream of sexual abuse allegations against him.
He's not a fit and proper person to be a school bus driver let alone President, how do they reconcile their beliefs with his actions???
I can't stand fuuucking hypocrites and they're hypocrites of the highest order.
America is facing the world biggest IQ test and if they elect Trump they'll have failed it miserably.
CNN
Updated 2032 GMT (0432 HKT) November 1, 2016
Although Trump's single-point advantage over Clinton is statistically negligible, it is his first lead in an ABC/Post poll since May -- perhaps giving hope to the Republican presidential nominee's supporters, who believe their candidate's prospects were bolstered last week with the revelation that the FBI is reviewing new emails found on the laptop of Anthony Weiner, the former congressman and estranged husband of top Clinton aide Huma Abedin.
Still, it may be too early to gauge the electoral impact of that development, which broke on Friday. Clinton still leads Trump in the CNN Poll of Polls, an average of the five most recent national phone polls, including Tuesday's ABC/WaPo tracking survey, 46%-42%.
The latest ABC/Post poll showed a lack of enthusiasm among Clinton supporters. Only 45% of the Democratic nominee's backers say they are very enthusiastic about supporting her, down 7 percentage points since the start of the tracking poll and eight points lower than the share of Trump supporters who say they are very enthusiastic about supporting their candidate.
Updated 2032 GMT (0432 HKT) November 1, 2016
Although Trump's single-point advantage over Clinton is statistically negligible, it is his first lead in an ABC/Post poll since May -- perhaps giving hope to the Republican presidential nominee's supporters, who believe their candidate's prospects were bolstered last week with the revelation that the FBI is reviewing new emails found on the laptop of Anthony Weiner, the former congressman and estranged husband of top Clinton aide Huma Abedin.
Still, it may be too early to gauge the electoral impact of that development, which broke on Friday. Clinton still leads Trump in the CNN Poll of Polls, an average of the five most recent national phone polls, including Tuesday's ABC/WaPo tracking survey, 46%-42%.
The latest ABC/Post poll showed a lack of enthusiasm among Clinton supporters. Only 45% of the Democratic nominee's backers say they are very enthusiastic about supporting her, down 7 percentage points since the start of the tracking poll and eight points lower than the share of Trump supporters who say they are very enthusiastic about supporting their candidate.
We can't work out why any Australian would want a Trump Presidency.
His election puts us in immediate security danger and certain damage to our economy.
Yet some on here are cheerleading for him.
Strange to say the least
His election puts us in immediate security danger and certain damage to our economy.
Yet some on here are cheerleading for him.
Strange to say the least
The only winners will be winning Australian punters and bookmakers.
The worse the economy the more people punt.
Some on here would have to change their nickname from " 2 Houses" to 2 Houses 1 car and an apartment"..........and that's just too long for a nickname.
The worse the economy the more people punt.
Some on here would have to change their nickname from " 2 Houses" to 2 Houses 1 car and an apartment"..........and that's just too long for a nickname.
OK OK Hilarious ..we get it ..we've heard it -----Trump-no taxes / talks about women....OMG
Here we have an experienced politician focused on very little about politics ..repeating over and over and over again..
The un-rattleable has been rattled..======Hilarious---YOUR FIRED.....
With the sprint to next Tuesday’s finish well and truly underway, Ms Clinton made sure to sharpen her broad attack against the Republican candidate during her three events in critical Florida, before heading to Arizona.
She criticised her rival on a number of issues, including Mr Trump’s refusal to release his tax returns, the $US900 million-plus business loss he reportedly claimed in 1995, and his comments made about immigrants and women.
“For my entire life, I’ve been a woman,” Ms Clinton, who would be the nation’s first female president, declared during the day. “And when I think about what we now know about Donald Trump and what he’s been doing for 30 years, he sure has spent a lot of time demeaning, degrading, insulting and assaulting women.”
Ms Clinton didn’t address the renewed investigation into emails that may have come from her private server, instead imploring voters not to “get distracted” in the final days.
“It is time for us to say, ‘No! We are not going backwards. We are going forward into a brighter future’. How do we do that? For the next seven days focus on what is important. Don’t get distracted. Don’t get diverted,” she encouraged the crowd.
“I have stayed focused on you, on your lives, your families, the problems that keep you up at night.”
Here we have an experienced politician focused on very little about politics ..repeating over and over and over again..
The un-rattleable has been rattled..======Hilarious---YOUR FIRED.....
With the sprint to next Tuesday’s finish well and truly underway, Ms Clinton made sure to sharpen her broad attack against the Republican candidate during her three events in critical Florida, before heading to Arizona.
She criticised her rival on a number of issues, including Mr Trump’s refusal to release his tax returns, the $US900 million-plus business loss he reportedly claimed in 1995, and his comments made about immigrants and women.
“For my entire life, I’ve been a woman,” Ms Clinton, who would be the nation’s first female president, declared during the day. “And when I think about what we now know about Donald Trump and what he’s been doing for 30 years, he sure has spent a lot of time demeaning, degrading, insulting and assaulting women.”
Ms Clinton didn’t address the renewed investigation into emails that may have come from her private server, instead imploring voters not to “get distracted” in the final days.
“It is time for us to say, ‘No! We are not going backwards. We are going forward into a brighter future’. How do we do that? For the next seven days focus on what is important. Don’t get distracted. Don’t get diverted,” she encouraged the crowd.
“I have stayed focused on you, on your lives, your families, the problems that keep you up at night.”
History will be made !
Regardless of who wins the presidential election this November, we will witness history being made.
If Hillary Clinton wins the U.S. presidential election, it will be the first time in history that two U.S. presidents have slept with each other.
( that we know of )
If Donald Trump wins the U.S. presidential election, it will be the first time in history that a billionaire moved into public housing vacated by a black family.
Regardless of who wins the presidential election this November, we will witness history being made.
If Hillary Clinton wins the U.S. presidential election, it will be the first time in history that two U.S. presidents have slept with each other.
( that we know of )
If Donald Trump wins the U.S. presidential election, it will be the first time in history that a billionaire moved into public housing vacated by a black family.
Why have we donated to Clinton's Foundation?
Why have Australian governments tipped money into Hillary Clinton's Clinton Foundation? That it gave Julia Gillard a job and effectively a platform to now spruik Hillary Clinton for president shows just how this very dodgy Foundation works.
The Australian taxpayer shovelled at least $88 million into the Clinton Foundation and associated entities from 2006 to 2014, reaching a peak of $10.3 million in 2012-13, Gillard’s last year in office.
On the Clinton Foundation website, AusAID and the Commonwealth of Australia score separate entries in the $10 million-plus group of donors, one rung up from American teacher unions.
In 2009-10 Kevin Rudd handed over another $10 million to the foundation for climate research, part of $300 million he squandered on a Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute.
Gillard also donated $300 million of our money to the Clinton-affiliated Global Partnership for Education.
Lo and behold, she became chairman in 2014 and has been actively promoting Clinton as president ever since — in a campaign video last December slamming Trump, in opeds trumpeting the next woman president and in appearances with Clinton spruiking girls’ education.
Why have Australian governments tipped money into Hillary Clinton's Clinton Foundation? That it gave Julia Gillard a job and effectively a platform to now spruik Hillary Clinton for president shows just how this very dodgy Foundation works.
The Australian taxpayer shovelled at least $88 million into the Clinton Foundation and associated entities from 2006 to 2014, reaching a peak of $10.3 million in 2012-13, Gillard’s last year in office.
On the Clinton Foundation website, AusAID and the Commonwealth of Australia score separate entries in the $10 million-plus group of donors, one rung up from American teacher unions.
In 2009-10 Kevin Rudd handed over another $10 million to the foundation for climate research, part of $300 million he squandered on a Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute.
Gillard also donated $300 million of our money to the Clinton-affiliated Global Partnership for Education.
Lo and behold, she became chairman in 2014 and has been actively promoting Clinton as president ever since — in a campaign video last December slamming Trump, in opeds trumpeting the next woman president and in appearances with Clinton spruiking girls’ education.
Henry you are indeeed a moron it has been proven over and over that over 90% of the money donated to the clinton foundation indeed goes to charity and it ranks among the top charities in the world, let alone in the US, stop falling for Republican bullshiiit
They should be buying $20000 paintings of The Donald to hang on the wall.
That's what charity money should be used for.
Monica Monica
That's what charity money should be used for.
Monica Monica
Nov 4, 2016 -- 4:12PM, Lets Elope wrote:
Henry you are indeeed a moron it has been proven over and over that over 90% of the money donated to the clinton foundation indeed goes to charity and it ranks among the top charities in the world, let alone in the US, stop falling for Republican bullshiiit
The people of Haiti disagree. You just lost the small amount, if any, credibility you had left.
Incorrect Nugget the agencies that assess charities rates it among the very best best in the world but hey none of you lot have ever let facts get in the way of a good story now have you, so why change now.
https://www.charitywatch.org/ratings-and-metrics/bill-hillary-chelsea-clinton-foundation/478
https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=16680
http://fortune.com/2016/08/27/clinton-foundation-health-work/
https://www.charitywatch.org/ratings-and-metrics/bill-hillary-chelsea-clinton-foundation/478
https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=16680
http://fortune.com/2016/08/27/clinton-foundation-health-work/
I've often wondered to myself in a moment of quiet reflection....what sort of arseh0le would vote for Trump....I need wonder no more.
Lets Elope • November 5, 2016 1:42 PM GMT
Incorrect Nugget the agencies that assess charities rates it among the very best best in the world but hey none of you lot have ever [b]let facts get in the way of a good story now have you, so why change now.
Agencies? Since when have websites with no authority whatsoever become 'agencies'? Anyone can make a website and anyone can be paid to make a website. Jeez, some people will believe anything and then pass it off as factual.
Incorrect Nugget the agencies that assess charities rates it among the very best best in the world but hey none of you lot have ever [b]let facts get in the way of a good story now have you, so why change now.
Agencies? Since when have websites with no authority whatsoever become 'agencies'? Anyone can make a website and anyone can be paid to make a website. Jeez, some people will believe anything and then pass it off as factual.
The "charity watcher" organisations you listed have links to the Democrat party. For example charitynavigator.org has an ongoing relationship with the Clinton Foundation and was a member of the Clinton Global Initiative from 2012 to 2014 and its creators are known democrat donors. Just lefties supporting other lefties is all these 'watchers' are. The lefties like to keep the market cornered when it comes to the non-profit charity racket.
Nov 6, 2016 -- 10:51AM, J.R.Hartley wrote:
I've often wondered to myself in a moment of quiet reflection....what sort of arseh0le would vote for Trump....I need wonder no more.
The only excuse you could have for voting Hillary would be sheer ignorance. Looks like you fit the bill.
Ah...the white male uneducated target species of the Trump campaign has turned up...
....Vote for racism or wallow in blissful ignorance....mmmmm tough call that....
....Vote for racism or wallow in blissful ignorance....mmmmm tough call that....
I'm sorry nugget...I forgot that I was addressing a Trump supporter...maybe if I deliver the line 'a la Trump' you'll be able to
comprehend what the word means..ahem....'It's Racism folks...R.A.C.I.S.M...Racism....but don't
worry folks...WE....ARE....NOT..GOING...TO ....LET....THEM.....GET.....AWAY......WITH....IT.....Everything is going to be GREAT folks'.
Cue chants....U.S.A...U.S.A...U.S.A....
comprehend what the word means..ahem....'It's Racism folks...R.A.C.I.S.M...Racism....but don't
worry folks...WE....ARE....NOT..GOING...TO ....LET....THEM.....GET.....AWAY......WITH....IT.....Everything is going to be GREAT folks'.
Cue chants....U.S.A...U.S.A...U.S.A....
Best you stay "blissfully ignorant" as you put it and not comment on things which you don't understand.
You're going to have to try harder than that if you want to defend the indefensible nugget....my advice would be to give up and
embrace your racism....you're guilty by association anyway tbf....go on...look in the mirror and say the words...I am a
racist....better still do it like a true Trumpete...fold your index finger over to meet your thumb to make that silly o sign trump
loves and say the words with meaning.....I....AM.....A....RACIST.
Don't worry though Nugget.....'Everything is going to be just Great folks'.
embrace your racism....you're guilty by association anyway tbf....go on...look in the mirror and say the words...I am a
racist....better still do it like a true Trumpete...fold your index finger over to meet your thumb to make that silly o sign trump
loves and say the words with meaning.....I....AM.....A....RACIST.
Don't worry though Nugget.....'Everything is going to be just Great folks'.
Resort to calling people you know nothing about racists because you can't form a proper argument, that's pretty low.
These days people like you throw the word racist around so much now it's lost some of its meaning and impact, just so you can take some moral high ground. By doing this it also makes it harder for those who are true victims of racism to heard amongst the noise.
Calling people a racist is not how you win an argument or get your point across. I'm starting to think you may have a brain injury though.
Oh look Hillary is a racist
http://www.dailywire.com/news/10033/
hillarys-former-white-house-chef-says-she-called-chase-stephens#
Calling people a racist is not how you win an argument or get your point across. I'm starting to think you may have a brain injury though.
Oh look Hillary is a racist
http://www.dailywire.com/news/10033/
hillarys-former-white-house-chef-says-she-called-chase-stephens#
mugget • November 8, 2016 12:26 AM GMT.....'These days people like you throw the word racist around so much now it's lost some of its meaning and impact'
That's more like it nugget!...that could have been taken from page 1 of Trumps latest book...How to become a racist.....other
recommended reading material for you would be the following:..Hitler...simply misunderstood and Putin...What a nice man......enjoy...
That's more like it nugget!...that could have been taken from page 1 of Trumps latest book...How to become a racist.....other
recommended reading material for you would be the following:..Hitler...simply misunderstood and Putin...What a nice man......enjoy...
Had family fight in the second world war against the nazi's, also lost family in the second world war. Your a f*ck wit.
I'll stand up all day for what they fought for. We wont forget.
Did you here about the one where Clinton associate Laura Silsby was arrested in Haiti for child trafficking right after the earthquake. She was arrested at the border with 33 children she claimed were all orphans and that she was to start an orphanage in the Dominican (Dominican officials had received no submission for anything of the like), after authorities investigated it was found none of the children were orphans and that along with her accomplices she had stolen them in the chaos after the earthquake. She had previously been turned back at the border with 40 children due to no paperwork.
Huma Abedin emailed Hillary directly on numerous occasions regarding Silsby's arrest in Haiti (other emails show a connection between Hillary and Silsby going back to 2001). One email discussed the cost of transporting the children out of the country. The lawyer who represented Silsby was one Jorge Puello Torres, a convicted human sex trafficker. Emails also show a lawyer contacting Hillary regarding the case.
It wasn't until after Bill and Hillary arrived in Haiti and the Clinton Foundation put pressure on the local authorities that Silsby and her crew were released. Silsby now has a high position in the amber alert system.
Huma Abedin emailed Hillary directly on numerous occasions regarding Silsby's arrest in Haiti (other emails show a connection between Hillary and Silsby going back to 2001). One email discussed the cost of transporting the children out of the country. The lawyer who represented Silsby was one Jorge Puello Torres, a convicted human sex trafficker. Emails also show a lawyer contacting Hillary regarding the case.
It wasn't until after Bill and Hillary arrived in Haiti and the Clinton Foundation put pressure on the local authorities that Silsby and her crew were released. Silsby now has a high position in the amber alert system.
Spoiler alert. 99.9% of Trump supporters aren't racist. Don't fret.
J.R.Hartley acka top farrier, acka poke my bvm
you have made a come back i see after a 12 month sook
you truely showed yourself as you really are. a looney left supporter.
i see your the one bringing race into the argument with nugget, that make you the racist!!!
you dont agree with nugget so your simpleton way out is to call him a racist.
me im no racists either, i am an equal opportunity hater. dislike trump of cliton
also the cheek of you, using the race card knowingly it has been declined due to insufficient funds.
and you thought i had dissapeared, doubt that, lol
anyway on a brigter note good to see your in good health
you have made a come back i see after a 12 month sook
you truely showed yourself as you really are. a looney left supporter.
i see your the one bringing race into the argument with nugget, that make you the racist!!!
you dont agree with nugget so your simpleton way out is to call him a racist.
me im no racists either, i am an equal opportunity hater. dislike trump of cliton
also the cheek of you, using the race card knowingly it has been declined due to insufficient funds.
and you thought i had dissapeared, doubt that, lol
anyway on a brigter note good to see your in good health
ms clinton in a spot of bovver if prez don pursues the email trail...maybe 25 to life?
wont that be great.. i hope he does, shes a hard left crim. 20 years easily
I see you've adopted Mugsy's modus operandi regarding soiling the memory of your dead war hero's in order to score a cheap point Muggit....shameful imo.
My advice would be to stay away from Mugsy...he's like a virus.
My advice would be to stay away from Mugsy...he's like a virus.
You're lucky you lot didn't end up speaking German. You're welcome.
Just sayin, also I have no animosity towards Germans btw.
I bet jrh owns a Palestinian flag that he waves at his protest marches he attends too.
I bet jrh owns a Palestinian flag that he waves at his protest marches he attends too.
mugget • November 10, 2016 10:04 PM GMT
'Just sayin, also I have no animosity towards Germans btw'.......Pathetic....aren't there any racists on here with any backbone ffs!
Tbas...Spoonless...Loveboys...Bluffer.....That spineless grass Mugsy couldn't have got them all banned.
'Just sayin, also I have no animosity towards Germans btw'.......Pathetic....aren't there any racists on here with any backbone ffs!
Tbas...Spoonless...Loveboys...Bluffer.....That spineless grass Mugsy couldn't have got them all banned.
J.R.Hartley • November 11, 2016 11:15 AM GMT
aren't there any racists on here with any backbone ffs!
No backbone? Well, you'd know I guess, given the history of your place. This would be a trait you could identify with I'm sure.
I do have some German and Irish heritage so I dont know if that would qualify as racist anyway but you're the expert.
In any case America chose the right candidate, the only decision they could have made. You wont have to wait long to see that proven true.
aren't there any racists on here with any backbone ffs!
No backbone? Well, you'd know I guess, given the history of your place. This would be a trait you could identify with I'm sure.
I do have some German and Irish heritage so I dont know if that would qualify as racist anyway but you're the expert.
In any case America chose the right candidate, the only decision they could have made. You wont have to wait long to see that proven true.
Don't worry everything is going to be just Great Folks.....unless you're Black...Hispanic..Chinese...Mexican...Irish...gay..or a woman wanting an abortion.
If you're a white...extremely thick....racist..bricklayer however...good times ahead.
If you're a white...extremely thick....racist..bricklayer however...good times ahead.
I'm pretty sure Irish are white. And extremely thick.
Typical narrow minded view of a white..extremely thick...Aussie 'Redneck'....at least he embraces his racism...although Muggets
admission that he loves the Germans is a step towards 'coming out'.
admission that he loves the Germans is a step towards 'coming out'.
JR you just seemed to get your lists mixed up a bit there. You got your Irish in there with your Chinese and your Blacks when clearly they should have been in the other list. Sharp as a bowling ball!!
I would say you're displaying a perfect case of 'virtue signalling' but I really think you're just attempting to take the p*ss
Virtue signalling eh Mugget...very good 
...did you get that out of a xmas cracker....Us Irish are quite at home on the persecuted list thank you Kami.
...did you get that out of a xmas cracker....Us Irish are quite at home on the persecuted list thank you Kami.
Something about the Irish mentality, they've been dominated so often for so long. They see oppression everywhere and feel some form of guilt due to the fact they couldn't stop their own submission and feel the need to speak out.
you'll often see them waving a Palestinian flag at a protest rally in their own country for instance
FFS are they white or not? Brian O'Driscoll looks white to me. I could be wrong. Apparently Damien Mackenzie is a Maori so it's hard to tell these days.
Yes we have felt the misery of oppression...which is indeed why we speak out.
No need to ask you what flag you wave Mugget....you get them free with a copy of Mein Kampf apparently.
No need to ask you what flag you wave Mugget....you get them free with a copy of Mein Kampf apparently.
you need to break out of that victim mentality, its not helping anyone
I'm feeling some misery right now!
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539