We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
Australian
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
For many years it was 18 v. 18,the 19th and 20th player would only come onto the ground in a desperate bid to shift momentum for the losing side OR give the interchange players a chance to stretch their legs,if the leading team felt the game was safe. Now that's all history,it's 21 running players v. 21 running players. Injuries have always been accepted as bad luck including a player being concussed by accident or 'design'. The strict concussion rule has also made the original interchange methods look completely outdated. The majority of proud Aussie rules supporters don't want a Red card introduced for a player knocking out another,but when it happens in an important game and the interchange can't cover that loss,most will star howling for change. 21 v. 20 in a close game can make all the difference.
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539