Australian
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
This mob lost 40m last year in their Aussie operation and overall have lost 70m + since setting up in Australia, their turnover is now 1.5billion dollars. They have a fcken turnover of 1.5billion and they are still able to lose, who may I ask is operating this company, we know they don't hang onto winning punters they are quickly shown the door, I gotta say they must have monkeys running the business, surely there must be some talent amongst their 210 staff or does it just go to show that the foreign invaders that have taken over the Australian wagering markets have "no idea" unless they have brought out an existing successful aussie bookie and learnt from the Australian staff in place.
Show More
I wouldnt stress about it as it is only sensible for many reasons to show a loss......
"The company is majority owned and run by Denise Coates, the very private entrepreneur who Forbes estimates is worth $US1.6 billion ($1.7 billion)."
http://www.smh.com.au/business/wagering-business-bet365-doubles-local-startup-losses-20140806-100zu6.html
Great opportunities for tax benefits and feeding money to related companies......
Millionaire/Billionaire operators are smarter than you might think!
"The company is majority owned and run by Denise Coates, the very private entrepreneur who Forbes estimates is worth $US1.6 billion ($1.7 billion)."
http://www.smh.com.au/business/wagering-business-bet365-doubles-local-startup-losses-20140806-100zu6.html
Great opportunities for tax benefits and feeding money to related companies......
Millionaire/Billionaire operators are smarter than you might think!
Logroller:
"who may I ask is operating this company,"
Answer:
Most likely associates and employees of "Denise Coates, the very private entrepreneur who Forbes estimates is worth $US1.6 billion ($1.7 billion)"
I would assume with highly paid accountants that look at every angle.
Just trying to answer your question ----
Like I suggested: Don't stress about it.....let them cope a loss or engage monkeys ....does it matter?
"who may I ask is operating this company,"
Answer:
Most likely associates and employees of "Denise Coates, the very private entrepreneur who Forbes estimates is worth $US1.6 billion ($1.7 billion)"
I would assume with highly paid accountants that look at every angle.
Just trying to answer your question ----
Like I suggested: Don't stress about it.....let them cope a loss or engage monkeys ....does it matter?
there products are the best
there odds are the best
even if you have little idea tipping you can get over bet365
there odds are the best
even if you have little idea tipping you can get over bet365
Must admit ...I have an account ... it is very impressive interface IMO .....remember when I first saw it I went WOW
Their best of any two nominated totes is huge.
I've had 7 accounts,all restricted at between $2000-$6000
A mate has had over 45 and still going strong.
I've had 7 accounts,all restricted at between $2000-$6000
A mate has had over 45 and still going strong.
Id have to say Best out of all Corps with what they offer.
Fixed odds or Best of 2 Totes.
Quads are great as pays best of 2
Problem is 1 win and u are restricted to $2 Max
Fixed odds or Best of 2 Totes.
Quads are great as pays best of 2
Problem is 1 win and u are restricted to $2 Max
There is no doubt they are the best if you are smart enough to beat their restrictions. The clues are bet small, never back the same horse twice, even if it shortens, and only do withdrawals when you really need to. If you have a losing run, always top up the account.
If you are good enough to never back a winner with them, then surely you are just better off with a 100% strike rate of laying them on BF? 
I concur with Castiron, an undoubted voice of reason. And, if you're specialty is, say, greyhounds, for example, if you take multis, couple them into maybe a shortie at the football...it seems they are less likely to bar anyone cross-betting on codes. Or cross-dressing, as well....
Aug 8, 2014 -- 3:35AM, Lordship wrote:
I concur with Castiron, an undoubted voice of reason. And, if you're specialty is, say, greyhounds, for example, if you take multis, couple them into maybe a shortie at the football...it seems they are less likely to bar anyone cross-betting on codes. Or cross-dressing, as well....
So basically if you turn yourself into a mug punter to keep an account with them, you will probably be able to?
once again you completely misunderstand what someone writes. But can't wait to inform them how much better your own idea is.... 100% laying strike rate on bf is how you learn to pay pc and be happy 
What idea exactly was mine that I couldn't wait to inform people of?
You seem a very bitter man. Unsure what your point is. You directed a post at me, which I replied to in confusion about your point, and then you are calling me out for responding?
I hope things pick up for you as clearly something isn't right.
I hope things pick up for you as clearly something isn't right.
that's our old mate BJT, he's like the bloke who hits golf balls into a tin can in his backyard and then tell Tiger Woods how to play the game
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539