Australian
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Iv gone with Richmond again 
I'm home I reckon
I'm home I reckon
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 115
|
By:
Goin out soon,hope there's a tv at the premise
 |
|
By:
Good start, I have them 2.63 from here.
|
|
By:
Sydney Richmond Line
NOW $1.875 $2.143 2.75 Sydney Goal $1.619 $2.615 8.540625 Richmond Goal $2.265 $1.790 -3.459375 Line Betting 2.5 $1.732 $2.367 -2.5 1.5 $1.777 $2.287 -1.5 0.5 $1.824 $2.213 -0.5 -0.5 $1.875 $2.143 0.5 -1.5 $1.928 $2.077 1.5 -2.5 $1.985 $2.015 2.5 -3.5 $2.046 $1.956 3.5 -4.5 $2.110 $1.901 4.5 -5.5 $2.178 $1.849 5.5 -6.5 $2.250 $1.800 6.5 2 bets stand out. Richmond at 2.40 well over the odds. Line is 6.5 with the books 1.90. Getting on Tigers +6.5 knowing it should be 1.80. Hate betting on the Tigers, but the numbers are what they are. |
|
By:
Swans still win this easily a couple of minutes before halftime they were better than 2.1 absolutely ludicrous. 1.85 to win by 5 points or more is lunacy, if they get up they will run right over the top of them and win comfortably.
|
|
By:
As ridiculous as their fumbling their way to half time 14 points down?
|
|
By:
Sydney Richmond Line
NOW $1.559 $2.788 7.375 Sydney Goal $1.338 $3.960 13.165625 Richmond Goal $1.946 $2.057 1.165625 Line Betting -2.5 $1.663 $2.508 2.5 -3.5 $1.722 $2.386 3.5 -4.5 $1.785 $2.273 4.5 -5.5 $1.854 $2.171 5.5 -6.5 $1.929 $2.076 6.5 -7.5 $2.011 $1.990 7.5 -8.5 $2.099 $1.910 8.5 -9.5 $2.196 $1.836 9.5 -10.5 $2.301 $1.769 10.5 -11.5 $2.415 $1.707 11.5 -12.5 $2.540 $1.649 12.5 Sportingbet have 11.5 line at 1.90 here. Have to go a little more on Richmond at those odds vs the 1.70.... |
|
By:
it was actually $1.95 to win by 5 points or more 1.85 was a typo. tigers have been game but swans still win this and fairly comfortably in the end from here. tigers by 1 point at 3/4 time after a long goal from miles on the siren to regain the lead after the swans had hit the front.
|
|
By:
Dusty another addition to Dunstalls dribble kick file after that effort stupid lairising kick, he could have easily kicked a drop punt and kicked a very important goal just seconds into the 4th quarter
|
|
By:
buddy simply outstanding
|
|
By:
McVeigh, Kennedy the winners for Swans. Kennedy stared but never got 30+ Possessions, 12 Tackles. Hopefully gets a 1 or 2 Vote. Martin will get 3
Buddy id say was beat but kicked 4 Reid, doing a lot of unnoticed work. Imthemightyquin Just does enough to win, stalemates helped Will only win a G! this year in Backyard. |
|
By:
Not anywhere near the horse he was lloydy injuries, advancing age and natural wear and tear are slowly taking their toll on him, will need all the breaks and david hercules and co. to draw badly to win another really big one I think unless he can lift significantly on his current form.
|
|
By:
2 lines on offer for Port Adelaide. Both tough games last week so even if Port come out flat like Sydney did, should still find a way to win by 8. I have them winning by >46.
Taking -43.5 at 2.00 as I have it 1.896. Taking -41.5 at 1.91 as I have it 1.824. |
|
By:
Bris won't kick a goal tonight....
|
|
By:
Suns made the eagles form look good today
 |
|
By:
I am very critical of betts I think he's a massively over rated front running showboat but he's worked his arse off tonight both ways and has been exceptional, be nice if he produced that same kind of effort week in, week out.
|
|
By:
Good game but would have rathered Adelaide didn't come back. Was looking at a nice cozy profit but had to dump over half of it. Good results in profit land all the same.
Should be money to be made tomorrow too by the looks. |
|
By:
Freo are apparently a good wet weather team so how come West Coast are atrocious in it? http://www.afl.com.au/news/2014-06-22/freo-like-singing-in-the-rain-says-lyon
Cause of all their tall players? |
|
By:
Because they are rubbish I think.
|
|
By:
Backing the Blues at 1.33 is not a recipe for success. Laying it, GWS on the march.
|
|
By:
They are going alright so far
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
can melbourne beat north melbourne? What about Melbourne +20.5 is this a good back or not. Ater last nite loss on bosnia i want to cover some losses
|
|
By:
I have Melbourne +20.5 at about 2.25. North at -20.5 would be a good back, they are about 1.78.
|
|
By:
thanx
|
|
By:
np. But that is just my book. Long term you are well off, but no sure bets obviously in the short term.
GL which ever way you go. |
|
By:
i backed GWS +16.5 and i can see it coming through. Next ill be backing melbourne +20.5
|
|
By:
oh my farking god what is this game coming to, it is being ruined by these prima donna umpires darling pushed him squarely in the side which you're allowed to do and clearly outbodied him and was penalised for being way too strong, I don't care who it happens to, it's a bloody joke and a very sad day for the game.
|
|
By:
stop being a drama queen
|
|
By:
at least that one by gwilt was fair in the back
|
|
By:
saints just about home here
imo |
|
By:
Vixens nearly home too
 |
|
By:
really good mark and goal by McGovern, gee he's a great contested mark
|
|
By:
 ..party in the showers..  |
|
By:
dream on ted
|
|
By:
Rhino did you actually see it, it was an absolute shocker it's craap like that which is slowly but surely destroying our great game.
|
|
By:
Billings will kick 10
|
|
By:
by the way Bennell the sub??? clearly missing his run and carry, precise ball use and great evasive skills coming out of the backline. Strange decision that one obviously they wanted to give schofield a full game but at the expense of bennell???
|
|
By:
He did kick 6 goals yesterday, he probably needs a rest.
|
|
By:
wow shocking loss by the blues there, no murphy no carlton???
|