Grand National
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
27 Mar 12
22:13
Joined:
Date Joined:
05 Apr 02
Was looking at the following website:
http://www.grandnationalrecords.co.uk/
and was thinking of laying horses 51-59 on the assumption that no more than 10 of the top forty were withdrawn on the run up to the race. Are these sure lays or do you think more than a maximum of 10 could drop out?
Was also looking at Paul Nicholls and Richard Johnson`s past record on the website and was thinking of laying their reps. What you think? Didn`t realise that P.Nicholls had had so many runners over the years.
http://www.grandnationalrecords.co.uk/
and was thinking of laying horses 51-59 on the assumption that no more than 10 of the top forty were withdrawn on the run up to the race. Are these sure lays or do you think more than a maximum of 10 could drop out?
Was also looking at Paul Nicholls and Richard Johnson`s past record on the website and was thinking of laying their reps. What you think? Didn`t realise that P.Nicholls had had so many runners over the years.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 4
|
By:
The words "Guaranteed Profit" made me laugh
|
|
By:
Any horse entered up but ballotted out will not be treated as a non-runner, stakes will be returned.
|
|
By:
netted
|
|
By:
lay junior all day long
|