Kat Huberty

She is well established AAPL sell side pimp FFS. Nothing but "aapl to the moon" has ever come out of her mouth.......which I would have no problem with if it included "buy,buy,buy anything, the FED's got you back"

Case in point:

"Morgan Stanley’s Kat Huberty reviewed the results of the firm’s AlphaWise survey, telling investors late Wednesday to expect big things from Apple. She believes the Cupertino, Calif. tech giant could ship up to 36 million iPhones during the fourth quarter of 2011 – much higher than the 28 million Wall Street projects."



She predicted 36 million, the street expected 20 million (not 28 as stated in the article) and actual shipments came in at 17 million - less than half of what she was forecasting.

Yeah, and that $960 in 2012 looks like a great call too //sarc.


P.S. polyahole, stop fondling that ipad FFS, you'll go blind.

Probably slightly more credible than you. Weren't you the mug who made loads of stupid AAPL sales predictions, none of which were remotely in the same ballpark as the real figures, and to top it all of, you went SHORT at $300.

Wipeout, you better see a doctor soon, the scabs on those knees are bleeding profusely.

cash announcement tomorrow morning, should be interesting

Is this it???

Pretty underwhelming announcement if you are asking me. The $10bn stock buy-back, spread over three years at that, is pretty minuscule compared with their market cap and the 1.7pc dividend yield is a complete joke.

But thank you Tim Cook for bellowing it from the top of your lungs that growth through product innovation has come to an end. Sooner or later even the fanboys catch on that making marginal improvements to a mature product, slapping a new number at the end of the name and expecting consumers to shell another $1,000 is a mugs game.

Is Kat Huberty aware that iPad3 sales are weaker than expected and there are reports surfacing that it may have a technical issue with running hot?

Just wondering....

https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3811560?start=30&tstart=0

melly- your posts are getting more and more absurd. Your stupidity knows no limits apparently.

AN FRANCISCO (AFP) - Apple announced Monday it will spend part of its massive cash hoard to pay its first dividend since 1995, and trumpeted that it had sold three million new iPads on the opening weekend.

Apple also revealed plans to buy back $10 billion in shares while still adding to the billions it has in its coffers.

"The new iPad is a blockbuster with three million sold -- the strongest iPad launch yet," said Apple senior vice president of worldwide marketing Philip Schiller.

"We can't wait to get it into the hands of even more customers around the world this Friday," he continued, noting the new-generation of Apple's coveted tablet computer will be released in two dozen more countries on March 23.


92 billion in the bank.


"The new iPad is a blockbuster with three million sold -- the strongest iPad launch yet,

but according to you melly

Sooner or later even the fanboys catch on that making marginal improvements to a mature product, slapping a new number at the end of the name and expecting consumers to shell another $1,000 is a mugs game.

MUGS GAME?


mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm   

Apple shares climbed with the news, hitting $603.37 in trading that followed the close of the market.


Wait, apparently melly thinks its smarter  to buy nylons, tampax and build bombshelters to fens off the effects of hyperinflation

  I think we all know who the mug is.

STFU already you moron, is there no thread on here you're going to spare not posting your brainless sh1t on?

Try to do some research for a change benny the clown instead of cutting and pasting from your local rag.

Ooooops, my bad, I mentioned "research" and your name in the same sentence.

What a pathetic waste of good oxygen this clown is....

no amount off research  changes the facts you moron.

you would be the dumbest guy I have ever come across on a financial forum.

what sort of idiot calls a company  92 billion in the bank- a mug company?

melly- you are a demented fool.

get down to the 7/11 and buy some more liquor chocs.

Man I tell you, we've all encountered massive stupidity at some point, but you are dumber than a box of rocks.


P.S. Try looking up the "facts" somewhere else than the local rag you read every morning and cut and paste on here........calling you a clown is starting to sound like flattery.

are yu  some kind of desperado melly?

Current Time    Tuesday, 20 March 2012 at 6:09:35 AM GMT

wat the fkk are you doing on the forum at 6am?

Though the stock popped more than $14 in midafternoon trading on Monday, Sansoterra thinks more buying is to come.

It’s a bullish stance, given that the stock took on $70 billion in market cap  in just eight days of trading.

70 billion in 8 days- its a mugs game apparently.

melenus- the complete mugs guide to being a mug.

polyahole, remind me again, what was the name of that gal that called aapl at $960 in 2012, I want to send her some flowers

She still has a job only because halfwits like you......believe her.

melly, you completely missed the point, try reading it again.

you also missed the ng move for an entire year

and your aapl short, MASSIVELY.

and the direction and timing on your qqq

Four posts on the trot minutes apart.

Do you suffer from attention deficiency disorder or something, or is it too difficult for you to put up a post longer than a single line?

Hey, don't stop fondling that iPad just yet, the year is just started, it may turn out that she is right after all and the stock does hit $960 this year. At least I hope so for your sake, since you hold her in such a high esteem you felt compelled to start a thread with her name as the title exalting her virtues. Fanboys not only have a blind devotion to all things apple, but they also evidently have a blind devotion to those who have a blind devotion to all things apple. Lively...

Huberty almost lowest in analysts estimates for next week with $9.63 eps (from 13 March though), highest from the institutions is Hargreaves at $11.80 (17 Apr). the traditionally more accurate independents are all higher, up to $15.

All I want to know is was she buying at $644?

what we want to know melly is WHAT are you doing in AAPL.???

sitting on the sidelines taking potshots at posters is pathetic.

man up or fkk off.

$12.30, and an amazing 47.4 gross margin, should be a good day tomorrow

polybot 23 Apr 12 10:55 
thanks ben, wasn't planning on buying just yet but might look at some more longer term buys if the price drops this week, original plan was buying in the may/june period.
earnings will be good but maybe not good enough for the week, have some other stocks reporting later in the week so looking forward to getting aapl done.



That was your last post re:aapl.

I don't pretend to be smart enough to decipher the heavy intellectualism you post on here, and my hegelian dialectic is a little rusty, but why will exactly "tomorrow" be a good day?

You were obviously expecting the price to pop even lower before you went long, on earnings that "were may be not good enough for the week", so what's the celebrating all about?

Oh, I forgot, it's all part of that circus routine. Never mind, carry on..

just in case you missed it melly...

"polybot • April 22, 2012 5:23 AM BST
couldn't resist the price last friday and put about 5 percent of the returns into weeklys for earnings"

This should be clear, even to you melly

"polybot • April 23, 2012 10:55 AM BST
wasn't planning on buying just yet but might look at some more longer term buys if the price drops this week"

This also should be clear, the price dropped significantly this week (after this post), on monday AND tuesday.

poor old melly absolutely seething!

Let me get this straight, you put your aftertimed ficticious returns inro unspecified weeklies. Calls, puts, who knows?

So the "might look", tuned into "have done it"' and the expectation that earnings might "not be good enough" turned into buying calls.

Well done then, truly the world must be upside down where you live.

**** you are stupid. why would anyone (apart from you) buy puts after the fall?
and weeklys were bought friday, "longer term buys" were bought this week, not for the week.
the reason you're such a failure melly is that you have no concept of risk and no financial intelligence.

Do you actually believe this stuff you're posting, or are you just practicing evasive maneuvers?

What the feck is wrong with you?

What do you mean why would you buy puts after the fall? If you're expending earnings to "may be not be good enough for the week" (your fecking words, not mine) , then you have every reason to buy weekly puts because the price, if that's the case, will fall further. If your buying for "longer term", then why not wait until after the drop and maximize your purchase?

I suppose in your upside down world you live in, those who were buying puts on RIM at $100 after falling from $140 were doing the wrong thing. Or is aapl always an one way trade?

I should know better than to argue with a fanboy.

P.S. If you're going to respond, try to concentrate (I know it's hard for you but at least try), gather all your thoughts for a few minutes and put everything up in one post. I hate scrolling through four posts to decipher what the feck you are talking about.