bb66 I'm not complaining my daily losses ( which was fortunately covered by trading ) I'm thinking about:
Cetkovska 6.4 Medina 4.5 Goerges 2.3
did we have 9 matches already? LOL
bb66 I'm not complaining my daily losses ( which was fortunately covered by trading ) I'm thinking about:Cetkovska 6.4Medina 4.5Goerges 2.3did we have 9 matches already? LOL
whenever a few favs lose, as they do from time to time, someone starts a fred like this. no one starts a fred saying "omg! 15 out of 16 favs won today!!!"
whenever a few favs lose, as they do from time to time, someone starts a fred like this. no one starts a fred saying "omg! 15 out of 16 favs won today!!!"
bb66 yes... Serena far from being value... GVL I started this thread just to put here a question... cause my WTA numbers are not satisfying me... that's all...
bb66 yes... Serena far from being value... GVL I started this thread just to put here a question... cause my WTA numbers are not satisfying me... that's all...
75% of wta favs win. that's a very solid number. so imagine a roulette wheel with 27 reds and 9 blacks, backing dogs is like playing black. ok, that's a very inexact analogy as the odds aren't the same, but it shows what sort of hit rate you're looking at. if you have the stomach for long losing runs then go for it.
75% of wta favs win. that's a very solid number. so imagine a roulette wheel with 27 reds and 9 blacks, backing dogs is like playing black. ok, that's a very inexact analogy as the odds aren't the same, but it shows what sort of hit rate you're looki
that'0s exactly what I was thinking GVL.... I'll leaving WTA alone for a bit while I think a solution about it... thanks for the analogy.. it gives out the idea in a simple way.. just like as it is...
that'0s exactly what I was thinking GVL.... I'll leaving WTA alone for a bit while I think a solution about it... thanks for the analogy.. it gives out the idea in a simple way.. just like as it is...
i think it's also fair to say that most wta favs trade higher in running. the hardest part is backing the fav and letting the bet run even though she looks like she's having a bad day, because the fav will often win eventually.
i think it's also fair to say that most wta favs trade higher in running. the hardest part is backing the fav and letting the bet run even though she looks like she's having a bad day, because the fav will often win eventually.
fully agree here to gvl, that's why I usually top up in play, and in most cases favs prevail. But if I'm not convinced of a fav winning pre match, I won't bet on him/her in play even at better odds, when (s)he is already behind.
@gvl you raised a point concerning my thread and in play bets, I asked for your reasoning in my thread, but maybe you didn't look into it since then.
fully agree here to gvl, that's why I usually top up in play, and in most cases favs prevail. But if I'm not convinced of a fav winning pre match, I won't bet on him/her in play even at better odds, when (s)he is already behind.@gvl you raised a poin
nah, it was fun when it started because the rev and 70k started at the same time, good laugh seeing what the others had blogged. and it started in the winter not much else to do. but it became a bit of a chore, and when the weather got better time not well spent. and it also stopped being of any assistance to the discipline, in fact a hindrance as i started thinking "oh fck what am i going to say if this loses?" that's not what you want to be thinking!
anyway, back to the point of the fred, 6 out of 7 favs won today, but all traded higher, some a lot! make of that what you will.
nah, it was fun when it started because the rev and 70k started at the same time, good laugh seeing what the others had blogged. and it started in the winter not much else to do. but it became a bit of a chore, and when the weather got better time no
i thought venus looked pretty good yesterday. but today's possible subtext is interesting. venus has virtually nailed her olympics spot now, so may not be bothered. otoh she can still possibly get a seed for rg i think. but seeding at a slam doesn't matter that much as you don't get a bye. i'd suspect she'll take the win today if it's given but isn't going to bust a gut to try and get a seed.
i thought venus looked pretty good yesterday. but today's possible subtext is interesting. venus has virtually nailed her olympics spot now, so may not be bothered. otoh she can still possibly get a seed for rg i think. but seeding at a slam doesn't
gvl, where can i read the news venus is in olympics?
anyway, i really haven't seen much of williams' bro in their prime except their highlights where they pretty muscled everyone
nowadays, their power looks to be somewhat diminished and venus doesnt seem to be moving well, but thats just me
gvl, where can i read the news venus is in olympics?anyway, i really haven't seen much of williams' bro in their prime except their highlights where they pretty muscled everyonenowadays, their power looks to be somewhat diminished and venus doesnt se
lol i get it. i had a go at gaekwon on it and someone must've reported it so the fred bounced back to 18 may. but i'm still here, so unlucky soa or marin1977
lol i get it. i had a go at gaekwon on it and someone must've reported it so the fred bounced back to 18 may. but i'm still here, so unlucky soa or marin1977