'Naked rambler' Stephen Gough jailed again

I didn't think it would stand up in court

I'm not getting the horse racing connection.

He looks like a horse^^

Couldn't get into the Royal Enclosure ....... nowhere to pin his badge ....

kincsem i think the connection is to the other post ,i ve got 10 stone testicles

Ffs no freedom
I was with my gf in bedmond woods in herts when he came from nowhere he smiled and caused no offence at all  All that prison come on

Usually seen in  ........ "The Members" enclosure .......

wouldnt be surprised to see a 2yr old named after him !

the guy has naked ambition

Team him up with Brix ...... The Naked Fashion Expert ....... hanging loose in the Members Enclosure ...... see if she can coax some life into it ..... sponsored by Viagra .....

It doesn't make sense really that he has been sent to prison. what about the naked bike ride with everyone going through central London bollock naked every year and no one gets arrested. what makes that ok and him naked in public illegal? surely the law is the same for everyone.

it is not illegal to be naked - only if it causes offence or leads to public disorder hth

so if I tell the police that I am offended by the sight of the hundreds going through London naked they will be arrested?

technically yes ,but they would claim its unrealistic to arrest so many,

theyprosecute people who download music even though everyone does

the geezers out of his skin...............

has he come in his coat.

seemed to take em a very very long time to jail these immigrant groups that were taking the cloths of young girls in care...........................is this geezer a DANGER!

he thought he'd get away with it

he was too cocksure of himself imo

wheres yer coat ?................as I walked in here to be sentanced ........it fell off...............

not the stevie gough

shoulda stuck too video on the points

one formline too many?

so if I tell the police that I am offended by the sight of the hundreds going through London naked they will be arrested?

only if you say they all callled you a pleb

by leaving court wearing only boots and socks.


the poor bloke is insane imo
pity they cant find a comfortable secure psychiatric unit for him

unless he likes it in prison

Not insane ffs we were born naked.

We live in a world were the naked body needs to be covered up! How mental is that?

Out of all the millions of creatures on the planet we imprison our naked selves..

We are really phucked up!

you have a point AG..

However his behaviour is extreme...most people would consider his behaviour wrong or at least a gross
violation of any notion of public decency.
But, as it appears, he does not see he is doing wrong himself, but sees himself as right....therefore he must be insane
Insanity is defines as the inability of an individual to distinguish right from wrong
they no awareness of it...which he has not in this one respect

He cant be left to wander naked everywhere, he would cause riots, he himself would in danger.
Maybe he is happiest in prison. But he has done nothing wrong.
I feel sorry for him. I think is a harmless soul...but 'mad' he is, and should be treated as such
with care and compassion.
although I fear the world we live in now...is not far off being 'mad' itself
as you have said yourself Angel

The problem is God elbulGery, or that aspect where we have distanced ourselves from the other creatures on the planet due to the idea of creationism before Darwin.

Long before Darwin came along we had already programmed ourselves that we wear clothes especially in colder climates but in warmer climates it is still acceptable by the tribal to be naked.

Then Darwin suggested we are not God like we are animal like and today we understand all the DNA lineage linking us all the way back through animal evolution.

Stephen Gough is not insane but making a stubborn stance because he believes strongly a man should be able to walk naked on this earth. He is actually a visionary. He does not want to wage war while our leaders do, who is insane again?

the M'Naghten rules defines legal insanity I think

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%27Naghten_Rules

He tried to kill the Prime minister, and in fact killed his secretary,
because he believed The Prime Minister was conducting a personal war against him

But would he get away with it today. Because a large part of our population
believe David Cameron is conducting a personal war on them, especially the less well off in our society.
So in fact not wanting to shoot the Prime Minister is the act of insanity
Catch 22

I know you are a kind man Angel

But your view is just too distanced from any idea of public decency for me

I believe Stephen Gough is insane

But he should not be punished, he needs help, but he must be confined....
so if he must be in prison, so be it...he must always be treated with care and compassion
as he himself cannot see the problem with his behaviour...he is 'mad'

we shall have to agree to disagree

He is an ex Marine, activist and naturist.

As an extreme naturist he would not be the first activist to sacrifice his freedom for his cause.

Insane No...Billy Big balls activist yes.

It would save an awful lot of fuss and bother for everyone, if he agreed to wear a small pair of pants.

two or three years ago very early one morning i was driving through the borders to edinburgh and just outside gala shields i say a big bum with two legs attached and a rucksack atop of it ... i thought i was dreaming after all at 6am its a bit unlikely ... i drove passed looked in my mirror and saw all his gear with his pendulum swinging to the time of his stride ,i must admit i drove to next turn off and retraced my way back for another look at this curiousity.as few days later he was arrested,,, its sad but inevitable ,,, the guy is probebly harmless but if someones kid is going to see him and tell their parents and all it takes is it to be the sort who hit first assumeing naked man equally peado ...i know its not the case but lets not forget people put out windows of doctor who was a peadiatrition assuming he was a danger to kids .

You have got me thinking Angel

So I will make one my sexist remarks here

Women complain about not being to show themselves in public yes

but they would not in the main go for full nudity, because they do not want to see the male member

It all goes back to Freud, and his penis envy

he was of course right

amazingly you have converted me Angel..you are in fact right

but as kemo has said the practical side of this would cause riots

but Steven doing what he is doing, is still insane in my view
(we are not ready for it)

but he needs help not punishment

Its all down to social programming, generally the body beautiful are comfortable naked in public,

yet the majority of humans are not body beautiful, if we all walked around naked there would be less sexual attraction

than if we were dressed to impress, i think it`s the way forward, lets get back to nature..with our laptops of course!

ok Angel
I would not like to fry anything naked

It is a great pity  we are not covered in hair or fur like the animals
I am sure if I Google it there is an evolutionary reason for nakedness..
but I think people would look a lot better in fur

total bolloc  ks imo

you are probably right lmfao

and we should a tail as well of course

from a purely aesthetic point of view

humans are quite ugly compared to most mammals, having no fur, hair or feathers.

so wearing clothes covers our innate 'ugliness'(and keeps us warm)

something women forget nowadays, often that which is concealed is more

alluring than that which is revealed

and as I said previously women do not like seeing male member..

it reminds them of what they do not have..

although tbh I not that keen myself on seeing other blokes todgers

I think horses should wear onesies.
http://i3.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/article4039104.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/horse-onesies-4039104.jpg

it is ridiculous keep jailing him

should be left to his own devices - though it would be rather disconcerting if he sat next to you on the train or the bus.

There should be a national rating system for women.

Younthen have to dress accordingly to it.

8/10 or above can dress scantily no one else.

So- we ban nakedness?
OK- what about banning red lipstick?

Google the reason women wear red lipstick and you'll find something like the following:

As we all know,(MoneyTree excepted) when a woman is sexually aroused, her vulva enlarges and becomes reddish as a result of becoming engorged with blood - needless to say this is a very stimulating, exciting and sexy sight for her partner. When this is coupled with her vaginal secretions, the effect is irresistible. This is what lipstick is all about, all the more so when her lips appear to be moist.

Try not to choke on your cornflakes.....

should be left to his own devices - though it would be rather disconcerting if he sat next to you on the train or the bus.

The naked Rambler

Not the naked commuter of public transport

what about them with there face covered up angel? we all watching too see if there packing explosives!

Exactly John,

Nudity should be promoted due to all the security risks we face these days. Nothing to wear/nothing to hide, beards still allowed however.

"beards still allowed however". If only angel,workplace dictatorship would have you believe different in many customer service environments.

Lmfaos sexual life is defined by google.

Bet he's perm on private browsing.

You'll find oe to pop,it one day ug

Angel G - i thought from reading about him elsewhere that he travelled all over the UK naked. I didn't realise that sometimes he was prepared to wear clothes, eg in prison i think he is also naked. Yes if he is prepared to wear clothes - say on the Clapham omnibus, then jailing him is even more ridiculous than I originally thought.

Nothing should stand in the way of natures beard, being forced to shave is another constraint by society, we are well and truly programmed just to fit into the system. We are just a product.

I wish they would control the corrupt Banks and Government,like they control the people with corporate law(where is our common law?)

Happy Valley

His activism is all about freedom of choice, whether to wear clothes or not. Does he use public transport

AG you are being too literal, obviously i just mean in a more social situation than out on a ramble

MJ

We can non conform to a certain degree, grow our beards together and always be aware of our common law and challenge the corporations who ignore it until we voice it. Corporations do not like resistance because they are so used to people(sheeple) just rolling over and accepting it because sheeple don`t like causing a fuss. More social  programming.

yes Angel i understand that!

HV

I don`t know much about his social situations. I have always had the impression he does not socialise beyond his his naturist activities and has not really had much chance recently to get out and about.

Though left to his own devices does he use his own personal transport to travel long distance or does he ramble and rough it haha..not sure if he would dress up for his kids graduation for example. How far does the activism go? but i do think he will carry on fighting the system for a few more years.

Yes because you are a fellow rebel John.

So getting your **** out is being a rebel and sticking it to the system?

Excellent, excellent, posts Angel Gabrial, class.

a  freeman on the land angel

You have won me over Angel
but you do realise Stephen can never win, he will spend a lot of time in prison

While it may be fine being a rebel, do we really want more nakedness
on sunny days it can be like 'the circus of horrors'..
so I think we need to cover up a lot more
just the tips of our noses should be seen  nothing else