5.05 lingfield

Iron Condor looks value to me at 8/1

I like Where's Suzie

bennelong w/p

I'm on Tasfeya (never bet on the horse I want), but it's a dog.  Isn't it?

Tasfeya    25 gl

sand skier gl

Knightly Escapade easily

It's been in to 13 today though, Tasfeya

Unex Renoir / w+p

Backed Kangaroo Court

If donohue rides this like the last then I'm sunk!

BBOOMMM come on

****ing ****ucker

wd eddy

WD eddy

wd eddy

**** you donohue

wd eddy

well done

cl eddy   

well done

nice win coooooleddy

wd

STEWARDS

Star took that...

half way across the track, short head .... wouldn't want the 1.01

cant chuck it out

Harsh if they do

Might lose that .....

Totally the horse

should get chucked

The last time the Stewards changed a result was in 863AD,

no bet on race - but got to be amended

no way anfield jockey did everything he could

The STEWARDS are getting on into 1.9 Sands Skier ....

same here no bet

doesn't matter ahern did nothing wrong the horse that was 2nd was impeded and was beaten by a sht hd!

1.69 to be amended

result will stand

sorry eddy thats just my take mate

no interest on race here

opened 1.34 in stewards!

flipperty flop

if the runner up was a higher profile jockey

stewards would defo chuck winner imo

Eddy, I'm looking for a tip for the next if you'd share your love!!!  going over to a thread for the next...

i am telling you it wont get amended fook the betting on here

horse should be thrown out after looking at the head on replay

high profile jockey now you are talking silly anfield

100.00     Sand Skier ir          £69

1.01      Star Commander           £23,616

no eddy


the stewards are often brainwashed with what jocks are involved!

thats as clear a case for an ammeneded result as you can get!

well i dont think so

was there interference?

did it affect the result

they are the 2 questions to answer

the fault of the jockey is irrelevant if yes to both

lay sand skier

well i hope you collect mate but you shouldn't imo

Either way, Lingfield Stewards will clean up here....

i dont think it affected the result

result amended imo

good shout, CE, but i dont often back in stewards inquiries, but have backed Sand Skier to get the race, Lingfield stewards are a bit old fashioned, not that i think it would matter this time.

you layed any off eddy mate?

result stands

wd

result stands come on

yessssssssssssssssssssssss

1st    1    Star Commander     9.81     8.50     +12%
2nd    6    Sand Skier     18     15     +15%
3rd    4    Knightly Escapade     5.8     5     +14%

STANDS

wd again Eddy

Nice

I give up, think they have to be put over the rails twice to get chucked out,

nice one Eddy.

never gonna chuck an horse out that leads for 1m5f and holds on never

Ed, that was disgusting, how that keep the race is beyond me, if i was the conection of the 2nd, i would appeal, not for the weak prize money, but for the injustice.

why didnt they chuck it out then sooty enlighten me or did i just get lucky its not a toss of a coin you know they must take everything in to consideration

eddy. i said it was a good call, you picked a nice winner, that dose not mean your an expert on stewards decisions ether am i, so grow up, lets see if the conections appeal, all i said was if i was in there shoes, i would, it was the last race, and the local stewards can get carried away with the free drink, and just want to get away, and its easer to leave the result as it is, I DO KNOW THIS, OK.

was the question too difficult sooty

eddy. your not getting the message, was the answer to much  for you swallow,

Had the winner backed in a bookies doing 1st past the post and i was so glad i had it done in the bookies,was 99 percent sure it would be an ammended result!

snorlax, along with many, but dont say that to Hot Ed.