completly agree with u i backed them last round against ipswich and they went off at 1.85 or so. they are even bigger now at 2,12 -which is huge even if they rest players
completly agree with u i backed them last round against ipswich and they went off at 1.85 or so. they are even bigger now at 2,12 -which is huge even if they rest players
As a City fan I invariably expect the worst on FA Cup day, but looking at it from outside, it's a surprise to see over evens being offered on one of the best teams in the Championship against a side two divisions below.
As a City fan I invariably expect the worst on FA Cup day, but looking at it from outside, it's a surprise to see over evens being offered on one of the best teams in the Championship against a side two divisions below.
Hull are defensively an excellent outfit, albeit they don't score many. Crawley don't score many either. Can't see Crawley getting a result. To say that Hull won't win, without backing it up with some substance, is a bit of a stupid thing to say, IMO.
Hull are defensively an excellent outfit, albeit they don't score many. Crawley don't score many either. Can't see Crawley getting a result. To say that Hull won't win, without backing it up with some substance, is a bit of a stupid thing to say, IMO
Maggot, Hull won't win in my opinion. I don't feel the need to share anything else with you. Besides, I gave you my reason. Learn to take in what you read before you judge people by your own, in my opinion, undoubtedly low standards. If you peruse your initial post you'll note you're guilty of your own stupidity. I shan't respond to you again so I'll bid you good day....
Maggot, Hull won't win in my opinion. I don't feel the need to share anything else with you. Besides, I gave you my reason. Learn to take in what you read before you judge people by your own, in my opinion, undoubtedly low standards. If you peruse yo