New Posts For Thread: Naps Comp Settlementhttps://community.betfair.com/your_competitions/go/thread/view/94214/30910677/naps-comp-settlementAfter Fyre cay was settled as a winner can we have a rule next month that the "official " winner should be the only one that counts. I realise this was a bit of a one-off but bookies pay out on two horses as an "ex gratia " payment quite regularly. ANot sure I'd go totally along with your defence lmlac as if we start taking bookie payouts into account it'll open a very messy can of worms. But as china says, this is a once in a century occurence where the one simple fact is that the winner didn'thttps://community.betfair.com/your_competitions/go/thread/view/94214/30910677/naps-comp-settlement?post_id=552460119#552460119Not sure I'd go totally along with your defence lmlac as if we start taking bookie payouts into account it'll open a very messy can of worms. But as china says, this is a once in a century occurence where the one simple fact is that the winner didn'tSat, 29 Jul 2017 14:48:26 -0500I can see it was a difficult one but I still think you were wrong tbh. The Naps Comps were well-established before BF SP was introduced so they had to be settled at ISP. Moreover they started well before the Sportsbook appeared so anybody with a Betfhttps://community.betfair.com/your_competitions/go/thread/view/94214/30910677/naps-comp-settlement?post_id=552459715#552459715I can see it was a difficult one but I still think you were wrong tbh. The Naps Comps were well-established before BF SP was introduced so they had to be settled at ISP. Moreover they started well before the Sportsbook appeared so anybody with a BetfSat, 29 Jul 2017 13:50:03 -0500I have to say, I thought long and hard about whether to settle the horse as a winner or loser. If we were using betfair SP then my decision would probably have been different. But a naps competition that uses industry SP should take into account whathttps://community.betfair.com/your_competitions/go/thread/view/94214/30910677/naps-comp-settlement?post_id=552459385#552459385I have to say, I thought long and hard about whether to settle the horse as a winner or loser. If we were using betfair SP then my decision would probably have been different. But a naps competition that uses industry SP should take into account whatSat, 29 Jul 2017 12:41:17 -0500We don't need another new rule for it though as its the first time its happened this century.https://community.betfair.com/your_competitions/go/thread/view/94214/30910677/naps-comp-settlement?post_id=552456099#552456099We don't need another new rule for it though as its the first time its happened this century.Sat, 29 Jul 2017 06:11:10 -0500Glad nobody picked it in Division 1 and only just noticed that it was settled as a winner in the Premier. Personally think that is the wrong decision as it didn't win but thats just my opinion.https://community.betfair.com/your_competitions/go/thread/view/94214/30910677/naps-comp-settlement?post_id=552456075#552456075Glad nobody picked it in Division 1 and only just noticed that it was settled as a winner in the Premier. Personally think that is the wrong decision as it didn't win but thats just my opinion.Sat, 29 Jul 2017 06:07:06 -0500The official result was the 50-1 won the raceso it should have been on all the compsother wise u are making up the rules as you go alonghttps://community.betfair.com/your_competitions/go/thread/view/94214/30910677/naps-comp-settlement?post_id=552455699#552455699The official result was the 50-1 won the raceso it should have been on all the compsother wise u are making up the rules as you go alongSat, 29 Jul 2017 04:46:13 -0500Its a "betfair exchange" competition and therefore should have been settled as a loser imo as on here they don't do ex gratia payments or pay out on both results and as such "the official result" has the 50/1 poke still as the winner until the inevithttps://community.betfair.com/your_competitions/go/thread/view/94214/30910677/naps-comp-settlement?post_id=552455629#552455629Its a "betfair exchange" competition and therefore should have been settled as a loser imo as on here they don't do ex gratia payments or pay out on both results and as such "the official result" has the 50/1 poke still as the winner until the inevitSat, 29 Jul 2017 04:26:11 -0500I am of course aware that there is a rule that says the settlers' decision in a grey area is final so I'm not even asking for it be overturned but I'm afraid the precedent means that every time the bookies make an "ex gratia " payout which happens nohttps://community.betfair.com/your_competitions/go/thread/view/94214/30910677/naps-comp-settlement?post_id=552455519#552455519I am of course aware that there is a rule that says the settlers' decision in a grey area is final so I'm not even asking for it be overturned but I'm afraid the precedent means that every time the bookies make an "ex gratia " payout which happens noSat, 29 Jul 2017 03:49:07 -0500Must admit, for purely selfish reasons I was hoping it would be settled on the official result. But this is such an outrageous, exceptional circumstance that I think our esteemed settler absolutely made the right decision. I know I would have been tohttps://community.betfair.com/your_competitions/go/thread/view/94214/30910677/naps-comp-settlement?post_id=552455385#552455385Must admit, for purely selfish reasons I was hoping it would be settled on the official result. But this is such an outrageous, exceptional circumstance that I think our esteemed settler absolutely made the right decision. I know I would have been toSat, 29 Jul 2017 03:09:21 -0500After Fyre cay was settled as a winner can we have a rule next month that the "official " winner should be the only one that counts. I realise this was a bit of a one-off but bookies pay out on two horses as an "ex gratia " payment quite regularly. Ahttps://community.betfair.com/your_competitions/go/thread/view/94214/30910677/naps-comp-settlement?post_id=552454547#552454547After Fyre cay was settled as a winner can we have a rule next month that the "official " winner should be the only one that counts. I realise this was a bit of a one-off but bookies pay out on two horses as an "ex gratia " payment quite regularly. AFri, 28 Jul 2017 17:38:34 -0500