<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Calling KC, Reg and Shane</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/your_competitions/go/thread/view/94214/30416173/calling-kc-reg-and-shane</link><description>Looks like we have a difference of opinion with regards to Invalid selections due to the 1 hour rule . Do we need a new rule written so everyone knows where we stand on this.</description><item><title>Hasn't the number one rule of betting always been that 'if you can't win then you can't lose'? mmmm, tell that to the bookies whydoncha?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/your_competitions/go/thread/view/94214/30416173/calling-kc-reg-and-shane?post_id=543056163#543056163</link><description>Hasn't the number one rule of betting always been that 'if you can't win then you can't lose'? mmmm, tell that to the bookies whydoncha?</description><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 02:48:49 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>no need to be sorry pete ... it's a valid viewpoint. I am not arguing FOR the rule, just that is IS the rule</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/your_competitions/go/thread/view/94214/30416173/calling-kc-reg-and-shane?post_id=543056157#543056157</link><description>no need to be sorry pete ... it's a valid viewpoint. I am not arguing FOR the rule, just that is IS the rule</description><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 02:47:21 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Reg I know you haven't asked for debate on this minor issue but I agree with Madhatter and KC on this one. (sorry)</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/your_competitions/go/thread/view/94214/30416173/calling-kc-reg-and-shane?post_id=543051887#543051887</link><description>Reg I know you haven't asked for debate on this minor issue but I agree with Madhatter and KC on this one. (sorry)</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2015 16:12:20 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>It won't make any difference to me which way you boys decide to go as I am always an early poster, but hasn't the number one rule of betting always been that 'if you can't win then you can't lose'?So calling a late post a non-selection would seem the</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/your_competitions/go/thread/view/94214/30416173/calling-kc-reg-and-shane?post_id=543051559#543051559</link><description>It won't make any difference to me which way you boys decide to go as I am always an early poster, but hasn't the number one rule of betting always been that 'if you can't win then you can't lose'?So calling a late post a non-selection would seem the</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2015 15:54:29 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Looks like I'm outvoted. -1 point it is then.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/your_competitions/go/thread/view/94214/30416173/calling-kc-reg-and-shane?post_id=543051505#543051505</link><description>Looks like I'm outvoted. -1 point it is then.</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2015 15:52:32 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>-&Acirc;&pound;1 is ok with me.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/your_competitions/go/thread/view/94214/30416173/calling-kc-reg-and-shane?post_id=543044605#543044605</link><description>-&Acirc;&pound;1 is ok with me.</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2015 12:00:53 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>So its -1 and should be entered as an invalid selection. I've no problem with that as I always check the time of the post when its close to the hour , which is quite often with me.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/your_competitions/go/thread/view/94214/30416173/calling-kc-reg-and-shane?post_id=543044047#543044047</link><description>So its -1 and should be entered as an invalid selection. I've no problem with that as I always check the time of the post when its close to the hour , which is quite often with me.</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2015 11:36:02 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Of course it's for fun KC, but fun quickly turns into some vicious argy-bargy when someone thinks they're hard done by - look at all the fuss we had over the dreaded LRF! - which is why I think it is generally best all round to stick to the rules wit</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/your_competitions/go/thread/view/94214/30416173/calling-kc-reg-and-shane?post_id=543043531#543043531</link><description>Of course it's for fun KC, but fun quickly turns into some vicious argy-bargy when someone thinks they're hard done by - look at all the fuss we had over the dreaded LRF! - which is why I think it is generally best all round to stick to the rules wit</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2015 11:09:13 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Oops - cat, pigeons</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/your_competitions/go/thread/view/94214/30416173/calling-kc-reg-and-shane?post_id=543043143#543043143</link><description>Oops - cat, pigeons</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2015 10:45:29 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Must admit I hadn't appreciated the distinction between optional and losing non-selections. I was probably guilty of transgressing the rule a couple of days ago. Someone mixed up the names of two horses and I allowed the use of a rest day. Upon refle</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/your_competitions/go/thread/view/94214/30416173/calling-kc-reg-and-shane?post_id=543043123#543043123</link><description>Must admit I hadn't appreciated the distinction between optional and losing non-selections. I was probably guilty of transgressing the rule a couple of days ago. Someone mixed up the names of two horses and I allowed the use of a rest day. Upon refle</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2015 10:44:23 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
