<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Running order statistics</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/xfactor/go/thread/view/112805/26281245/running-order-statistics</link><description>I have averaged out the running order places over the last 6 weeks, to see who has been getting the best draw. The lower the number the earlier the spot in the running order:Paije Richardson    4.50Rebecca Ferguson    5.67Cher Lloyd    5.67Mary Byrne</description><item><title>Agree he can't win (barring a real miracle) but he's already paid for Christmas for many of us and he may just have one more trick in the tail next week.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/xfactor/go/thread/view/112805/26281245/running-order-statistics?post_id=475124769#475124769</link><description>Agree he can't win (barring a real miracle) but he's already paid for Christmas for many of us and he may just have one more trick in the tail next week.</description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:27:28 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>cider if they put you and me in a boyband we'd have a better chance of winning this than wagner.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/xfactor/go/thread/view/112805/26281245/running-order-statistics?post_id=475124509#475124509</link><description>cider if they put you and me in a boyband we'd have a better chance of winning this than wagner.</description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:24:58 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Scraping through middle weeks has nothing to do with the OR of course.Betfair doesn't have enough figures to price up Waggy's true chance of commanding 9 million+ votes.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/xfactor/go/thread/view/112805/26281245/running-order-statistics?post_id=475124197#475124197</link><description>Scraping through middle weeks has nothing to do with the OR of course.Betfair doesn't have enough figures to price up Waggy's true chance of commanding 9 million+ votes.</description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:21:52 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Yeah less is more with wagner. If the anti cowell RATM thing has legs maybe the running order won't matter. Agree katie gets lost in the mix next week.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/xfactor/go/thread/view/112805/26281245/running-order-statistics?post_id=475123521#475123521</link><description>Yeah less is more with wagner. If the anti cowell RATM thing has legs maybe the running order won't matter. Agree katie gets lost in the mix next week.</description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:15:57 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Absolutely.  Surely she's a shoo-in for the bottom two next week with two songs to sing and therefore limited impact of running order?  Wagner likewise...The only saving grace for me this week was backing Katie to be first announced safe at 7/1 with</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/xfactor/go/thread/view/112805/26281245/running-order-statistics?post_id=475120797#475120797</link><description>Absolutely.  Surely she's a shoo-in for the bottom two next week with two songs to sing and therefore limited impact of running order?  Wagner likewise...The only saving grace for me this week was backing Katie to be first announced safe at 7/1 with</description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 16:52:49 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>katie proves again the importance of the pimp spot.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/xfactor/go/thread/view/112805/26281245/running-order-statistics?post_id=475109393#475109393</link><description>katie proves again the importance of the pimp spot.</description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 15:34:15 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>So from this we could conclude that Mary is likely to be in trouble next week. I suppose it will start to make less difference as views become more entrenched. Still there might be some miles in this yet. Good work though Crisp, some very interesting</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/xfactor/go/thread/view/112805/26281245/running-order-statistics?post_id=475108741#475108741</link><description>So from this we could conclude that Mary is likely to be in trouble next week. I suppose it will start to make less difference as views become more entrenched. Still there might be some miles in this yet. Good work though Crisp, some very interesting</description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 15:30:21 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Bottom two this week...Paige and Cher</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/xfactor/go/thread/view/112805/26281245/running-order-statistics?post_id=475106725#475106725</link><description>Bottom two this week...Paige and Cher</description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 15:18:35 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>The new pro-rata (out of 16) ratings:Paije Richardson 6.74Cher Lloyd 7.19Mary Byrne 8.08Rebecca Ferguson 8.15Matt Cardle 8.07One Direction 10.91Katie Waissel 11.37Wagner 12.56</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/xfactor/go/thread/view/112805/26281245/running-order-statistics?post_id=474983885#474983885</link><description>The new pro-rata (out of 16) ratings:Paije Richardson 6.74Cher Lloyd 7.19Mary Byrne 8.08Rebecca Ferguson 8.15Matt Cardle 8.07One Direction 10.91Katie Waissel 11.37Wagner 12.56</description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:25:21 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I have placed a very small bet on page @ 150 for the below reasons and because he can nail Let it be.If he takes notice of this and builds it up with some belting welly his price could crash.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eof2c5fTcI8If later he gets</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/xfactor/go/thread/view/112805/26281245/running-order-statistics?post_id=474835697#474835697</link><description>I have placed a very small bet on page @ 150 for the below reasons and because he can nail Let it be.If he takes notice of this and builds it up with some belting welly his price could crash.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eof2c5fTcI8If later he gets</description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:36:46 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
