<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: i tunes ratings</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/xfactor/go/thread/view/112805/26040697/i-tunes-ratings</link><description>Wagner 160Diva Fever 108Katie 256Belle Amie 114Paije 107John 59Storm 82Cher 468Treyc 118Mary 2411D 284Rebecca 162Aiden 639Matt 509ratings are not the same as downloads, but the relationship must not be far away,katie looks a good lay in the eliminati</description><item><title>WP</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/xfactor/go/thread/view/112805/26040697/i-tunes-ratings?post_id=470631137#470631137</link><description>WP</description><pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 03:30:51 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>mach Joined: 18 Apr 05Replies: 475 12 Oct 10 13:55    katie will never wins x factor,katie had the Gamu backlash, the public has a short memory.not only will katie not be out first on sunday she will not even be in the bottom 3, prob the first to be</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/xfactor/go/thread/view/112805/26040697/i-tunes-ratings?post_id=470609869#470609869</link><description>mach Joined: 18 Apr 05Replies: 475 12 Oct 10 13:55    katie will never wins x factor,katie had the Gamu backlash, the public has a short memory.not only will katie not be out first on sunday she will not even be in the bottom 3, prob the first to be</description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 20:06:15 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Cheers PeterKinda p1sses on mach's chips i'm afraidI think she may well survive this week, but only after a few leg-ups</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/xfactor/go/thread/view/112805/26040697/i-tunes-ratings?post_id=469854409#469854409</link><description>Cheers PeterKinda p1sses on mach's chips i'm afraidI think she may well survive this week, but only after a few leg-ups</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 08:14:43 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>There are two stats which can be gleaned from iTunes and they need to be considered together.  The first, as above, is the number of ratings for each contestant.  The second is the average value of those ratings ie their score between 1 and 5 where 1</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/xfactor/go/thread/view/112805/26040697/i-tunes-ratings?post_id=469854241#469854241</link><description>There are two stats which can be gleaned from iTunes and they need to be considered together.  The first, as above, is the number of ratings for each contestant.  The second is the average value of those ratings ie their score between 1 and 5 where 1</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 08:12:56 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>stuff like these really are irrlevent best to just trust ure own opinion</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/xfactor/go/thread/view/112805/26040697/i-tunes-ratings?post_id=469852837#469852837</link><description>stuff like these really are irrlevent best to just trust ure own opinion</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:59:39 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>for elimination betting wont matter if katie goes 2nd</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/xfactor/go/thread/view/112805/26040697/i-tunes-ratings?post_id=469852621#469852621</link><description>for elimination betting wont matter if katie goes 2nd</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:57:44 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>katie will never wins x factor,katie had the Gamu backlash, the public has a short memory.not only will katie not be out first on sunday she will not even be in the bottom 3, prob the first to be saved.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/xfactor/go/thread/view/112805/26040697/i-tunes-ratings?post_id=469852401#469852401</link><description>katie will never wins x factor,katie had the Gamu backlash, the public has a short memory.not only will katie not be out first on sunday she will not even be in the bottom 3, prob the first to be saved.</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:55:22 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>it's an interesting thing the bounce after being in bottom 2.you would normally expect something.  but i think this tends to go for the more talented, likeable but quieter acts - like rachel last year.  not sure how katie, who clearly lacks likeabili</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/xfactor/go/thread/view/112805/26040697/i-tunes-ratings?post_id=469852105#469852105</link><description>it's an interesting thing the bounce after being in bottom 2.you would normally expect something.  but i think this tends to go for the more talented, likeable but quieter acts - like rachel last year.  not sure how katie, who clearly lacks likeabili</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:52:43 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Oh I don't know mach!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/xfactor/go/thread/view/112805/26040697/i-tunes-ratings?post_id=469851749#469851749</link><description>Oh I don't know mach!</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:48:49 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I would have expected Katie to be a lot higher. Not a good sign for her</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/xfactor/go/thread/view/112805/26040697/i-tunes-ratings?post_id=469851713#469851713</link><description>I would have expected Katie to be a lot higher. Not a good sign for her</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:48:24 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
