<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Why are pundits playing the defence and not the attack?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/world_cup2014/go/thread/view/147697/30289367/why-are-pundits-playing-the-defence-and-not-the-attack</link><description>England had more shots than both Italy and Uruguay.  They converted their chances and England didn't.  The problem lies in converting chances.</description><item><title>They were both **** but i agree that they only target the defence.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/world_cup2014/go/thread/view/147697/30289367/why-are-pundits-playing-the-defence-and-not-the-attack?post_id=540058963#540058963</link><description>They were both **** but i agree that they only target the defence.</description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2014 05:33:33 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>blaming not playing ffs!!  I still haven't recovered</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/world_cup2014/go/thread/view/147697/30289367/why-are-pundits-playing-the-defence-and-not-the-attack?post_id=540058337#540058337</link><description>blaming not playing ffs!!  I still haven't recovered</description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2014 04:07:01 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>England had more shots than both Italy and Uruguay.  They converted their chances and England didn't.  The problem lies in converting chances.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/world_cup2014/go/thread/view/147697/30289367/why-are-pundits-playing-the-defence-and-not-the-attack?post_id=540058335#540058335</link><description>England had more shots than both Italy and Uruguay.  They converted their chances and England didn't.  The problem lies in converting chances.</description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2014 04:05:55 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
