<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: FGS vs To Score</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/world_cup/go/thread/view/107734/25345669/fgs-vs-to-score</link><description>I am a little confused between the big discrepency between players&amp;#039; FGS price and "to score" price (for ease I will use available "back" price and only look at certain starters):FGS / To ScoreVilla - 5.3 (18.9%) / 2.34 (42.8%)RVP - 10 (10%) / 4</description><item><title>I would suggest that the chance of Sneijder scoring any time is much greater than the match going to extra time and Villa then scoring during the extra 30 minutes.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/world_cup/go/thread/view/107734/25345669/fgs-vs-to-score?post_id=456742577#456742577</link><description>I would suggest that the chance of Sneijder scoring any time is much greater than the match going to extra time and Villa then scoring during the extra 30 minutes.</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 07:15:35 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>i hope sneijder scores, i'll be well in lol</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/world_cup/go/thread/view/107734/25345669/fgs-vs-to-score?post_id=456741453#456741453</link><description>i hope sneijder scores, i'll be well in lol</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 07:00:47 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Yes matrix. The flip side of that is that if he scores a goal in normal time and Sneijder also scores, then both bets show a profit.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/world_cup/go/thread/view/107734/25345669/fgs-vs-to-score?post_id=456741165#456741165</link><description>Yes matrix. The flip side of that is that if he scores a goal in normal time and Sneijder also scores, then both bets show a profit.</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 06:56:36 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>you are right, but his price in the top goal scorer mkt will drift significantly as the game progresses and a 4 way tie looms</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/world_cup/go/thread/view/107734/25345669/fgs-vs-to-score?post_id=456740985#456740985</link><description>you are right, but his price in the top goal scorer mkt will drift significantly as the game progresses and a 4 way tie looms</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 06:54:06 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>And if he scores in extra time, those people may end up losing both bets.To Score is only 90 minutes and injury time not extra time where as top goal scorer does include extra time.Am i right?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/world_cup/go/thread/view/107734/25345669/fgs-vs-to-score?post_id=456740845#456740845</link><description>And if he scores in extra time, those people may end up losing both bets.To Score is only 90 minutes and injury time not extra time where as top goal scorer does include extra time.Am i right?</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 06:52:19 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I would suggest it is related to the top goalscorer market where Villa is significantly under-priced imo. Some people are laying Villa on the TGS market and backing him to score any time on the "to score" market, thus pushing his price down in that p</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/world_cup/go/thread/view/107734/25345669/fgs-vs-to-score?post_id=456740161#456740161</link><description>I would suggest it is related to the top goalscorer market where Villa is significantly under-priced imo. Some people are laying Villa on the TGS market and backing him to score any time on the "to score" market, thus pushing his price down in that p</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 06:42:27 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I am a little confused between the big discrepency between players' FGS price and "to score" price (for ease I will use available "back" price and only look at certain starters):FGS / To ScoreVilla - 5.3 (18.9%) / 2.34 (42.8%)RVP - 10 (10%) / 4</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/world_cup/go/thread/view/107734/25345669/fgs-vs-to-score?post_id=456739925#456739925</link><description>I am a little confused between the big discrepency between players' FGS price and "to score" price (for ease I will use available "back" price and only look at certain starters):FGS / To ScoreVilla - 5.3 (18.9%) / 2.34 (42.8%)RVP - 10 (10%) / 4</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 06:37:17 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
