<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Chile at 80's / Argentina 13.5's WTF</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/world_cup/go/thread/view/107734/23766954/chile-at-80s-argentina-135s-wtf</link><description>Chile breezed through qualification scoring for fun and playing great football, whilst Argentina scraped through playing gash. Punters fall in love with the "big name" I geuss, anyway I'm taking full advantage</description><item><title>CHILE all the way ..............</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/world_cup/go/thread/view/107734/23766954/chile-at-80s-argentina-135s-wtf?post_id=427353686#427353686</link><description>CHILE all the way ..............</description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:12:25 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>*Change Netherlands for Francais after seeing official pots</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/world_cup/go/thread/view/107734/23766954/chile-at-80s-argentina-135s-wtf?post_id=427353534#427353534</link><description>*Change Netherlands for Francais after seeing official pots</description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 04:59:35 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Chile WILL qualify for sure as long as they dont draw netherlands or portugal from pot 2. In that case its a toss up. Coke individual players dont make up a team, that argentinas biggest problem NOW, and plus most of the players you speak of are long</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/world_cup/go/thread/view/107734/23766954/chile-at-80s-argentina-135s-wtf?post_id=427353530#427353530</link><description>Chile WILL qualify for sure as long as they dont draw netherlands or portugal from pot 2. In that case its a toss up. Coke individual players dont make up a team, that argentinas biggest problem NOW, and plus most of the players you speak of are long</description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 04:56:00 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Well said ;)</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/world_cup/go/thread/view/107734/23766954/chile-at-80s-argentina-135s-wtf?post_id=427353526#427353526</link><description>Well said ;)</description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 04:33:03 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Argentinas best could go close to winning WC Chiles couldnt imoHence ones 80/1 and other 13 Not saying argies wont turn up and again stink the place out like in qualifying but surely prices are based on potential</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/world_cup/go/thread/view/107734/23766954/chile-at-80s-argentina-135s-wtf?post_id=427353522#427353522</link><description>Argentinas best could go close to winning WC Chiles couldnt imoHence ones 80/1 and other 13 Not saying argies wont turn up and again stink the place out like in qualifying but surely prices are based on potential</description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 03:19:40 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Well, when you're trying to predict a World Cup outcome you need empirical evidence and in all world cups you've seen these few teams dominating, last example was Italy who weren't even in the top-4 favourites, but they won the World Cup because they</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/world_cup/go/thread/view/107734/23766954/chile-at-80s-argentina-135s-wtf?post_id=427353518#427353518</link><description>Well, when you're trying to predict a World Cup outcome you need empirical evidence and in all world cups you've seen these few teams dominating, last example was Italy who weren't even in the top-4 favourites, but they won the World Cup because they</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:27:47 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Well your logic and sense is clearly based on whats happened in the past as you say ' any given World Cup'This is not any given World Cup , it is the 2010 World Cup . So all 32 teams have a chance ,depending on how good they are now. You are just ma</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/world_cup/go/thread/view/107734/23766954/chile-at-80s-argentina-135s-wtf?post_id=427353514#427353514</link><description>Well your logic and sense is clearly based on whats happened in the past as you say ' any given World Cup'This is not any given World Cup , it is the 2010 World Cup . So all 32 teams have a chance ,depending on how good they are now. You are just ma</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:39:49 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>No, I'm not going with what was happening ages ago, I'm going with logic and sense, which dictates that there are 4 countries which can win any given World Cup, no matter of their qualification performance and these are Brazil, Germany, Italy and Arg</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/world_cup/go/thread/view/107734/23766954/chile-at-80s-argentina-135s-wtf?post_id=427353510#427353510</link><description>No, I'm not going with what was happening ages ago, I'm going with logic and sense, which dictates that there are 4 countries which can win any given World Cup, no matter of their qualification performance and these are Brazil, Germany, Italy and Arg</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:25:56 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>So you actually go on what was happening decades ago Coke? :|</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/world_cup/go/thread/view/107734/23766954/chile-at-80s-argentina-135s-wtf?post_id=427353506#427353506</link><description>So you actually go on what was happening decades ago Coke? :|</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:55:06 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>humberto suazo top goalscorer is 801/ - more likely to happen then chile winning outright imo and if Chile were to win the world cup then it would almost certainly meaning Suazo scoring for fun</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/world_cup/go/thread/view/107734/23766954/chile-at-80s-argentina-135s-wtf?post_id=427353502#427353502</link><description>humberto suazo top goalscorer is 801/ - more likely to happen then chile winning outright imo and if Chile were to win the world cup then it would almost certainly meaning Suazo scoring for fun</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:49:44 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
