New Posts For Thread: Aqueduct race 5 winner "running for purse money only"https://community.betfair.com/u.s._horse_racing/go/thread/view/94202/31520709/aqueduct-race-5-winner-running-for-purse-money-onlyI've never seen this before, but perhaps I've just never come across it. Commentator announces the late scratch of horse 2 and therefore horse 2B was declared as "running for purse money only". Horse 2B duly won, leaving the 2nd horse to be declaredCoupling is for the US tote market only. In the US Tote you can only bet on them as a pair, so you stake on horse 1, which includes both 1 and 1A. For the UK Betfair market they are NOT coupled so are treated as separate selections. The anomoly herehttps://community.betfair.com/u.s._horse_racing/go/thread/view/94202/31520709/aqueduct-race-5-winner-running-for-purse-money-only?post_id=557024577#557024577Coupling is for the US tote market only. In the US Tote you can only bet on them as a pair, so you stake on horse 1, which includes both 1 and 1A. For the UK Betfair market they are NOT coupled so are treated as separate selections. The anomoly hereWed, 17 Apr 2019 18:20:57 -0500Man USHR is confusing as anything. Never knew what the A/B thing was about, so B is only there to support A?a) If we back 2B where 2A is in the race do we win?b) If we back 2B where 2A has been a late scratch and not removed in the market do we lose?https://community.betfair.com/u.s._horse_racing/go/thread/view/94202/31520709/aqueduct-race-5-winner-running-for-purse-money-only?post_id=557018735#557018735Man USHR is confusing as anything. Never knew what the A/B thing was about, so B is only there to support A?a) If we back 2B where 2A is in the race do we win?b) If we back 2B where 2A has been a late scratch and not removed in the market do we lose?Tue, 16 Apr 2019 18:37:15 -0500Think this explains it quite well.First, everyone should understand that this is a rule of the New York State Gaming Commission, not NYRA, so before you go spouting off on Twitter or anywhere else, it’s good to get the facts right. The rule existshttps://community.betfair.com/u.s._horse_racing/go/thread/view/94202/31520709/aqueduct-race-5-winner-running-for-purse-money-only?post_id=556999649#556999649Think this explains it quite well.First, everyone should understand that this is a rule of the New York State Gaming Commission, not NYRA, so before you go spouting off on Twitter or anywhere else, it’s good to get the facts right. The rule existsSat, 13 Apr 2019 04:37:49 -0500Betfair removed this runner very late so if you didn't refresh your screen it was showing as a runner. I'm guessing that's what happened to the 1000 layer on the 4 horse who went on to 'win' the race (for betting purposes anyway), I'm assuming the 2Bhttps://community.betfair.com/u.s._horse_racing/go/thread/view/94202/31520709/aqueduct-race-5-winner-running-for-purse-money-only?post_id=556991459#556991459Betfair removed this runner very late so if you didn't refresh your screen it was showing as a runner. I'm guessing that's what happened to the 1000 layer on the 4 horse who went on to 'win' the race (for betting purposes anyway), I'm assuming the 2BThu, 11 Apr 2019 15:50:47 -0500I've never seen this before, but perhaps I've just never come across it. Commentator announces the late scratch of horse 2 and therefore horse 2B was declared as "running for purse money only". Horse 2B duly won, leaving the 2nd horse to be declaredhttps://community.betfair.com/u.s._horse_racing/go/thread/view/94202/31520709/aqueduct-race-5-winner-running-for-purse-money-only?post_id=556991069#556991069I've never seen this before, but perhaps I've just never come across it. Commentator announces the late scratch of horse 2 and therefore horse 2B was declared as "running for purse money only". Horse 2B duly won, leaving the 2nd horse to be declaredThu, 11 Apr 2019 14:48:44 -0500