<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: AAPL Tues 18 Jan</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tradefair__financials/go/thread/view/94198/26652917/aapl-tues-18-jan</link><description>Jobs news in the AM, earnings in the PM, first time I can remember earnings announced before Jan options expiry.best case is big sell off early and Apple provides reasonable guidance for a change, along with good numbers, plenty of other variables.wi</description><item><title>poor melanie....seething, huffing and puffing....maybe if you had a bit of success once in a while, it would help to take the edge off.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tradefair__financials/go/thread/view/94198/26652917/aapl-tues-18-jan?post_id=482925253#482925253</link><description>poor melanie....seething, huffing and puffing....maybe if you had a bit of success once in a while, it would help to take the edge off.</description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 08:48:08 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>@ polybotYou really are something. Let me spell it out for you since giving you hints doesn't seem to help you. The FED flooding the market with liquidity is the OVERWHELMING single reason why equities are rising, including your precious AAPL. It's t</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tradefair__financials/go/thread/view/94198/26652917/aapl-tues-18-jan?post_id=482903445#482903445</link><description>@ polybotYou really are something. Let me spell it out for you since giving you hints doesn't seem to help you. The FED flooding the market with liquidity is the OVERWHELMING single reason why equities are rising, including your precious AAPL. It's t</description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 04:01:13 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>JW, P/E is a rough indicator and only one of many, a company can be running at a loss and still be a good investment.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tradefair__financials/go/thread/view/94198/26652917/aapl-tues-18-jan?post_id=482891309#482891309</link><description>JW, P/E is a rough indicator and only one of many, a company can be running at a loss and still be a good investment.</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:41:39 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>where would the equities market be without the FED putting a bid under the market? is like asking where would I be today if I was kidnapped by pirates at age 5, I wasn't. and the fed did inject the liquidity. do you see that continuing in the future?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tradefair__financials/go/thread/view/94198/26652917/aapl-tues-18-jan?post_id=482890721#482890721</link><description>where would the equities market be without the FED putting a bid under the market? is like asking where would I be today if I was kidnapped by pirates at age 5, I wasn't. and the fed did inject the liquidity. do you see that continuing in the future?</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:31:26 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>about aapl and the back of napkin calculations.. of course we know we need 15 yrs of earnings to get to the present stock price ( ehm.. pe is at 15 ).my question was, should we buy only stocks with p/e between 5 and 10 then? im asking this as a serio</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tradefair__financials/go/thread/view/94198/26652917/aapl-tues-18-jan?post_id=482854973#482854973</link><description>about aapl and the back of napkin calculations.. of course we know we need 15 yrs of earnings to get to the present stock price ( ehm.. pe is at 15 ).my question was, should we buy only stocks with p/e between 5 and 10 then? im asking this as a serio</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 16:28:01 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>polybot, I don't have a problem at anything you have posted. It's just a different interpretation of AAPL related matters, and it's certainly different than mine. That's why there's a buyer for every seller, and a seller for every buyer.The only "bro</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tradefair__financials/go/thread/view/94198/26652917/aapl-tues-18-jan?post_id=482804217#482804217</link><description>polybot, I don't have a problem at anything you have posted. It's just a different interpretation of AAPL related matters, and it's certainly different than mine. That's why there's a buyer for every seller, and a seller for every buyer.The only "bro</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:27:24 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Why You Shouldn't Buy an iPhone -- YetVerizon subscribers have been a stalwart bunch. While AT&amp;T ( T: 28.48, +0.15, +0.52% ) customers flaunted their iPhones the last 3.5 years, Verizon subscribers countered with claims of network clarity and Droid s</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tradefair__financials/go/thread/view/94198/26652917/aapl-tues-18-jan?post_id=482784797#482784797</link><description>Why You Shouldn't Buy an iPhone -- YetVerizon subscribers have been a stalwart bunch. While AT&amp;T ( T: 28.48, +0.15, +0.52% ) customers flaunted their iPhones the last 3.5 years, Verizon subscribers countered with claims of network clarity and Droid s</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 03:29:01 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Is this what you mean by "details, specifics and facts" ????? you were expecting me to write you 50 page report? yes I've heard all those arguments over and over again for the last 4 years, when it was $90 plenty were applying the same logic claiming</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tradefair__financials/go/thread/view/94198/26652917/aapl-tues-18-jan?post_id=482783669#482783669</link><description>Is this what you mean by "details, specifics and facts" ????? you were expecting me to write you 50 page report? yes I've heard all those arguments over and over again for the last 4 years, when it was $90 plenty were applying the same logic claiming</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 02:59:20 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>JW, you are rather taking a narrow view of this, aren't you?"would be counterprodctive to advertise it" ?????Have you lost your mind? Is the BoE secretly lending it's "normal job"? How is secretly bailing banks out not a securities trading violation?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tradefair__financials/go/thread/view/94198/26652917/aapl-tues-18-jan?post_id=482782589#482782589</link><description>JW, you are rather taking a narrow view of this, aren't you?"would be counterprodctive to advertise it" ?????Have you lost your mind? Is the BoE secretly lending it's "normal job"? How is secretly bailing banks out not a securities trading violation?</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 02:25:14 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>wow, i admit my ignorance ( im a buy and hold investor in the stock market ), but - and i promise you these are serious questions - do all companies get valued at the expected profits over only 5yrs (plus cash)? what if we use a 10yr horizon and alre</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tradefair__financials/go/thread/view/94198/26652917/aapl-tues-18-jan?post_id=482752045#482752045</link><description>wow, i admit my ignorance ( im a buy and hold investor in the stock market ), but - and i promise you these are serious questions - do all companies get valued at the expected profits over only 5yrs (plus cash)? what if we use a 10yr horizon and alre</description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:23:05 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
