By:
Just can't see past Li Na here.
Cibulkova has surprised me a couple of times this week but the finals experience is massive in my opinion. That in itself makes this difficult if you don't fancy the current price on Li because early nerves could see her being gifted an early lead. |
By:
Na Li for me, maybe in 3 sets.
Cibulkovas' last two matches have been against two top players, Radwanska and Halep whose previous matches were both tough 3 setters. Thus Radwanska and Halep were possibly fatigued? Although saying this, Cibulkova also came off of a 3 set match against sharapova before beating Halep. Its hard to know if the heat from last week has affected them - how quickly would they have recovered? I know Sharapova was exhausted after her 3 set match against Knapp - did she fully recover? Na Li hasn't played anyone in the top 20, whereas Cibulkova has def. had the tougher draw playing 3 top players in her last 3 matches. Na Li has the experience. She has been to the aus open final a few times previously. Nerves could be an issue for Cibulkova. Both have only dropped one set in the tournament to date. |
By:
well i'm on Cibulkova myself...she's on a roll and i can't see the serial choker Li Na stopping her...i'm not worried about the h2h at all, had Cibulkova beaten Sharapova or Radwanska before ?
checkout each player's total of games lost in Oz and you will find Cibulkova has lost far, far less than Li Na...Cibulkova also beat far, far better player's than Li Na has. i think Cibulkova will win and win easily...5/2 is fantastic value imo. |
By:
£200 @ 3.48 now c'mon Dominika darling
![]() |
By:
Cibulkova is simply nowhere near tall enough.
Radwanska demolished her a year back in the NSW Open. The Radwanska that took the court on Thursday bore no resemblance to her usual precise self. Li has an imminent use by date. Assuming she can stave it off for a few more hours, this borders on a mismatch. |
By:
Cib is on a roll but Li has one slam already under her belt. Very difficult to call this one so Cib has to be a bet @ 3.5
|
By:
Not seen any of the Ladies' draw here, but surely, even for all her fight, we won't be seeing the words "Dominika Cibulkova" and "Grand Slam champion" appearing in the same sentence? Ever.
|
By:
The shortest one wins.
And i'm not talking about the odds. ![]() |
By:
Tennis is such a dirty sport even the live score feeds are corrupted.
Definitely the dirtiest sport in the world. Organized crime is so obviously prolific. |
By:
having money on Li Na is a tough experience. So many shots go long or when they go in they are on the line. Why not have some margin for error?
|
By:
Another choker to add to my list
|
By:
cibs not done yet
|
By:
Wanna bet?
She choked like you cannot believe in that tiebreak |
By:
Mental midget
|
By:
one of many in this sport
|
By:
didnt choke breaking li to get to 6-6
|
By:
lis just a better player
|
By:
Li sure knows how to make things look harder than they have to be
|
By:
sick,hate li dunno why
|
By:
|
By:
no hysterics, no falling on the floor, good stuff
|
By:
She won here at last, I just read a quote where she said "thanks to my agent for making me rich" lol, she is all about money.
|
By:
she's all about bashing her husband, must be money why he hasn't dumped her
|
By:
Li what a great speech!
|
By:
yeah masha,aza and big mama all do it for the love of and tennis and their fans,not for the ££££££££££SSSSSSSSS
![]() ![]() ![]() |
By:
^^ they don't apolgise first to all the sponsors when she's they're knocked out
|
By:
^^does that prove shes more greedier than them?maybe its her way of being polite
|
By:
![]() |