Tennis
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 95
|
By:
he will not retire in 2013 in my opinion
|
|
By:
He should,no more slams for him.
|
|
By:
Rafa will have no energy left after his 7 hr match with Novak on Friday, and Roger will lift his 2nd RG trophy on Sunday
 |
|
By:
Will see.
|
|
By:
Caramba, you do realize that Novak plays Kohlschreiber, who has defeated the serb on these same grounds not too long ago, next?
|
|
By:
Not just defeated, he SMASHED him.
Federer is still cool btw. HTH |
|
By:
mugs will be making the same thread for many more years
 |
|
By:
some more QFs in slams still to come
|
|
By:
will only retire when loses to players outside nole, mugray and rafa
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
you are a long time retired, he had weeks off this year with injury, will take 3 times as long just to get back, performance will riose again from September onwards
keep playing and earning, why not? |
|
By:
not much good playing well when the slams are done
|
|
By:
how many weeks was he off? 6 or 8? multiply by 3 to see when he could expect to reach pre injury levels
called The Principle of Reversibility |
|
By:
what injury?
he's simply playing a reduced schedule so he's fresher and can spend more time with his kids |
|
By:
i thaught berdy smashing him at us was a once off, but today just tells me he has to quit or hes guna lose his legacy.
|
|
By:
his back definitely tightened up and he had to rest, that means he has not trained properly
|
|
By:
all players have niggles
federer prob been the luckiest out there with injuries his game has been falling apart for years |
|
By:
what injury are you talking about?
|
|
By:
mugs will be seething when he makes Wimby final next month
will lose to Muzz but still the GOAT |
|
By:
I'm no fan but there is no reason for him to retire just because he doesn't win as much as he used to
I'm certain that he is not operating at optimal levels physically and he probably needs several months niggle free to regain the energy and movement he had 12 months ago speaking as a Physical Therapist on general principle that is of course, not having specific knowledge |
|
By:
I would retire on top. It will be interesting to see what more he can do?
|
|
By:
it's too late to retire on top as he clearly isn't, if he was going to do that he should have stood on Centre Court last year and announced it, that would have been going out on top
probably see how he does at Wimbledon |
|
By:
 top is not only number 1 but top 10 I would say |
|
By:
tipsarevic was top 10 for ages and hardly at the top
just another also ran for someone like fed, getting crushed by the rest of the top 6 is pointless |
|
By:
Just because swebih asked so nicely
 Still a mug thread though. I will always love and respect you Roger  |
|
By:
|
|
By:
stupid Stakhovsky ruined everything.
|
|
By:
yeah damn that guy
|
|
By:
Nothing he has said has even hinted that he will retire. Today he spoke about his new racquet and how he wanted two weeks to practice with it.
|
|
By:
its a shame but against mayer I said that's it the great man is finish
|
|
By:
fed wont go in 2013. but you kind of wish he did.
|
|
By:
can he even get to another final of a major, another semi?
|
|
By:
at no5 in wor
|
|
By:
at no5 in wor
|
|
By:
swebih 04 Jun 13 22:44
I would retire on top. It will be interesting to see what more he can do? agree |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Give the game up Fed and leave on a high.
Why go out getting beaten by everyone? |
|
By:
signed again
 |
