Tennis
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 116 comments are related to the topic:
Anderson v Ferrer
Anderson v Ferrer
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 116
|
By:
ferrer - federer, the one we should get will be interesting, the first time i'll have been interested in a fed dave match for years.... can he do it and overturn the 13 or is it 14-0 h2h. he wont get a better chance imo
|
|
By:
Anderson looks like Plug from the Beano
http://www.beano.com/media/80776/character-bash-plug.jpg |
|
By:
 |
|
By:
Ferrer's record of winning matches having won the first set 6-3 is 94-7.
|
|
By:
(since 2005)
|
|
By:
what's his record of winning matches 6-4?
|
|
By:
(6-4. first set)
|
|
By:
67-14
|
|
By:
so clearly ferrer likes serving first
|
|
By:
is this what you would call fishing?
|
|
By:
Anderson's record of winning matches from 3-6 in the first set is 5-13.
|
|
By:
And from 4-6 is 4-28. Does this mean that he dislikes serving first?!
|
|
By:
here's one for you s&a, whats wawrinka's record like v deep lying players like gasquet
|
|
By:
baseline ralliers?
|
|
By:
yeah, in slam 5 setters to be precise
|
|
By:
i don't have a clue how you've compiled these statistics but your excel spreadsheet must look very very interesting. all i need is your I.P. address now...
|
|
By:
Well Anderson isn't going to break, and his only hope of winning points is a big first serve. It's a complete mismatch.
I'd be surprised if Anderson won more than a handful of points on the Ferrer serve all match as he is so limited. |
|
By:
It's about 22-9
|
|
By:
I dont think Wawrinka and Gasquet specifically have played in a Slam.
|
|
By:
DF 14-3 KA (UE)
|
|
By:
ty s or a
|
|
By:
no they have only played once, its an interesting game price wise.
|
|
By:
can someone tell me who is serving, as my dodgy stream has gone.
|
|
By:
anderson. its 30-40 BP
|
|
By:
thx
|
|
By:
S o A spelt a word wrong
 |
|
By:
break ferrer
|
|
By:
nice :)
|
|
By:
Unders on the total games still at 1.2s!
|
|
By:
Surely Williams is free money v Vinci today too?
|
|
By:
surely it's more efficient to focus your tennis trading career on one market as oppose to all these different markets? that more time you focus on a single market i.e. sets market or match odds market, the better you become acquainted with the trends and potential outcomes associated with the odds given, I've only ever really tried match odds and i'd like to think i do a pretty good job at it... isn't it cumbersome doing all these different markets?
|
|
By:
sometimes the odds don't make that possible AZ91.
|
|
By:
The top punters, I am sure, will be those who can look at every match and pick out the best betting market for it.
|
|
By:
i presume you are talkinng about yourself
|
|
By:
talking*
|
|
By:
no, I dont do that a lot.
|
|
By:
just that on this match, I wanted bigger than the 1.1s on Ferrer.
|
|
By:
 only pullin ya leg |
|
By:
anderson isn't playing too bad, it's just that ferrer is in top gear and top gear ferrer > top gear anderson
|
|
By:
I thought that if the handicap was so large, that meant that the market/bookies knew that Ferrer was going to win easily. If he was going to win easily, then total games was going to be unders, and the odds on it were above evens, so I checked the stats for this round of the French Open and compared what they showed to the odds, making that, in my view, a value bet.
|