<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Women's Wimbledon Outright</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/30698999/womens-wimbledon-outright</link><description>Women's Wimbledon outright thread discussion. Was waiting for the movements after the French Open first before opening this. Will post the best prices available currently on players I talk about.Serena 2.76. What I don't really get about Serena's pri</description><item><title>If they were both playing at their best I think Vesnina is just a better grass court player than Cibulkova. The serve advantage in itself is huge. Vesnina had almost as long a fourth round as Cibulkova and a little less time to recover. I think the b</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/30698999/womens-wimbledon-outright?post_id=549253519#549253519</link><description>If they were both playing at their best I think Vesnina is just a better grass court player than Cibulkova. The serve advantage in itself is huge. Vesnina had almost as long a fourth round as Cibulkova and a little less time to recover. I think the b</description><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 03:53:49 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Any chance at all the Cibulkova ruined her chances with her wedding logistics? Surely that was playing on her mind as well. The having to change venues and dates and all the quests whose bookings would have been ruined. Not a good thing to do. As for</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/30698999/womens-wimbledon-outright?post_id=549253007#549253007</link><description>Any chance at all the Cibulkova ruined her chances with her wedding logistics? Surely that was playing on her mind as well. The having to change venues and dates and all the quests whose bookings would have been ruined. Not a good thing to do. As for</description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 23:40:57 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I think it's really hard to recover in a day from a match that was not only physically draining, but emotionally draining too with all the ups and downs. It clearly took a lot out of Cibulkova for today.I think we will get Serena vs Kerber final. Loo</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/30698999/womens-wimbledon-outright?post_id=549249007#549249007</link><description>I think it's really hard to recover in a day from a match that was not only physically draining, but emotionally draining too with all the ups and downs. It clearly took a lot out of Cibulkova for today.I think we will get Serena vs Kerber final. Loo</description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 11:04:56 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Don't know much about womens' tennis, but Kerber at 1.51 to beat venus Williams seems a decent price to me!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/30698999/womens-wimbledon-outright?post_id=549248887#549248887</link><description>Don't know much about womens' tennis, but Kerber at 1.51 to beat venus Williams seems a decent price to me!</description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 10:50:37 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>very well done with Cibu!Hope we don't get a sister act in the final!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/30698999/womens-wimbledon-outright?post_id=549248743#549248743</link><description>very well done with Cibu!Hope we don't get a sister act in the final!</description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 10:33:47 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Looks like you were spot on about Cibulkova. Serve just doesn't give her any cheap points and you need that if the rest of the game isn't there. Even below par I think she would have had chances against Makarova.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/30698999/womens-wimbledon-outright?post_id=549248511#549248511</link><description>Looks like you were spot on about Cibulkova. Serve just doesn't give her any cheap points and you need that if the rest of the game isn't there. Even below par I think she would have had chances against Makarova.</description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 10:12:38 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>true, but the week is yet TBD</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/30698999/womens-wimbledon-outright?post_id=549242619#549242619</link><description>true, but the week is yet TBD</description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 14:01:04 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Players who just had a big win always tend to get backed in a bit artificially short in the outright. As they attract a lot of money straight after these big wins.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/30698999/womens-wimbledon-outright?post_id=549242093#549242093</link><description>Players who just had a big win always tend to get backed in a bit artificially short in the outright. As they attract a lot of money straight after these big wins.</description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 12:58:52 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Cibby is getting married Saturday</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/30698999/womens-wimbledon-outright?post_id=549242083#549242083</link><description>Cibby is getting married Saturday</description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 12:57:55 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>It's more also that I don't think Cibulkova is really a good price anymore. When I posted she was 9.x with 3 matches to play and likely Serena looming in the SF's. That for me isn't/wasn't a good price anymore, as she should be like 5s vs Serena alon</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/30698999/womens-wimbledon-outright?post_id=549242077#549242077</link><description>It's more also that I don't think Cibulkova is really a good price anymore. When I posted she was 9.x with 3 matches to play and likely Serena looming in the SF's. That for me isn't/wasn't a good price anymore, as she should be like 5s vs Serena alon</description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 12:57:09 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
