New Posts For Thread: Rusedski and Bartoli say Federer is the Greatest Player of All Time ?https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/30335707/rusedski-and-bartoli-say-federer-is-the-greatest-player-of-all-timeCompletely ignoring Nadal's 25-10 record over him and the fact since Nadals first slam win his missed 5 slams and could have won them all, whereas federer has missed none. Nadal will overtake his record and with the positive h2h it will be a joke ifand fwiw, for me fed and nadal are equivalent on titles. i'm not going to try and separate based on that.nadal is better than fed because of the way he's adapted his game, set himself challenges and achieved them and the way he can seemingly controlhttps://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/30335707/rusedski-and-bartoli-say-federer-is-the-greatest-player-of-all-time?post_id=541166517#541166517and fwiw, for me fed and nadal are equivalent on titles. i'm not going to try and separate based on that.nadal is better than fed because of the way he's adapted his game, set himself challenges and achieved them and the way he can seemingly controlThu, 28 Aug 2014 08:26:57 -0500roddick was good when he was raw, and had a massive forehand to back up his serve.connors and stefanki stefankied him.https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/30335707/rusedski-and-bartoli-say-federer-is-the-greatest-player-of-all-time?post_id=541166437#541166437roddick was good when he was raw, and had a massive forehand to back up his serve.connors and stefanki stefankied him.Thu, 28 Aug 2014 08:20:43 -0500I always liked roddick as a player but theres no getting away from the fact that he was pretty average barring serve, if anyone got into a rally ud expect them to win the pointhttps://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/30335707/rusedski-and-bartoli-say-federer-is-the-greatest-player-of-all-time?post_id=541154371#541154371I always liked roddick as a player but theres no getting away from the fact that he was pretty average barring serve, if anyone got into a rally ud expect them to win the pointWed, 27 Aug 2014 14:07:57 -0500as one dimensional as he is roddick must be the unluckiest player in the open era not to win a wimbledon title. his peak years pretty much coincided with fed. could have had 3 or 4 without him being aroundhttps://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/30335707/rusedski-and-bartoli-say-federer-is-the-greatest-player-of-all-time?post_id=541154249#541154249as one dimensional as he is roddick must be the unluckiest player in the open era not to win a wimbledon title. his peak years pretty much coincided with fed. could have had 3 or 4 without him being aroundWed, 27 Aug 2014 14:04:34 -0500not even winning 18 slams would help Nadull becoming GOAThttps://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/30335707/rusedski-and-bartoli-say-federer-is-the-greatest-player-of-all-time?post_id=541154223#541154223not even winning 18 slams would help Nadull becoming GOATWed, 27 Aug 2014 14:03:56 -0500as far as the "elite" of tennis goes which is where the conversation is , Roddick is rubbish, awful tennis player who made the most of what he was given. Dress it up any way you want Roddick is poorhttps://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/30335707/rusedski-and-bartoli-say-federer-is-the-greatest-player-of-all-time?post_id=541154191#541154191as far as the "elite" of tennis goes which is where the conversation is , Roddick is rubbish, awful tennis player who made the most of what he was given. Dress it up any way you want Roddick is poorWed, 27 Aug 2014 14:02:18 -0500No, i'm saying you need to consider everything. Obviously Fed's H2H v Nadal counts against him but it doesn't automatically mean Nadal is the greatest.Some of you act like Roddick, Hewitt are rubbish. Roddick has a positive H2H v Djok...https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/30335707/rusedski-and-bartoli-say-federer-is-the-greatest-player-of-all-time?post_id=541153863#541153863No, i'm saying you need to consider everything. Obviously Fed's H2H v Nadal counts against him but it doesn't automatically mean Nadal is the greatest.Some of you act like Roddick, Hewitt are rubbish. Roddick has a positive H2H v Djok...Wed, 27 Aug 2014 13:45:58 -0500So nadal cant be as good as fed till he wins 18 slams? Thats fairly in accurate if u ask me given the fact nadal has had to beat murray and novak in there prime and argubly the greatest era of tennis everhttps://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/30335707/rusedski-and-bartoli-say-federer-is-the-greatest-player-of-all-time?post_id=541153253#541153253So nadal cant be as good as fed till he wins 18 slams? Thats fairly in accurate if u ask me given the fact nadal has had to beat murray and novak in there prime and argubly the greatest era of tennis everWed, 27 Aug 2014 13:15:41 -0500Nadal missed those slams because of the way he plays ffs His abrasive style means he cannot maintain that level for a full season every year. Part of being a tennis player is managing your body.Anyway Fed has played slams with a bad back and even phttps://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/30335707/rusedski-and-bartoli-say-federer-is-the-greatest-player-of-all-time?post_id=541153183#541153183Nadal missed those slams because of the way he plays ffs His abrasive style means he cannot maintain that level for a full season every year. Part of being a tennis player is managing your body.Anyway Fed has played slams with a bad back and even pWed, 27 Aug 2014 13:11:30 -0500Means **** all I could say to you H2H means **** all. Is Davydenko greater than Nadal because he's got a positive record?https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/30335707/rusedski-and-bartoli-say-federer-is-the-greatest-player-of-all-time?post_id=541153071#541153071Means **** all I could say to you H2H means **** all. Is Davydenko greater than Nadal because he's got a positive record?Wed, 27 Aug 2014 13:03:03 -0500