New Posts For Thread: Wozniacki vs Tsurenkohttps://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29634439/wozniacki-vs-tsurenkoNo thread yet?Who will win it??another hold here and its donehttps://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29634439/wozniacki-vs-tsurenko?post_id=528185117#528185117another hold here and its doneSat, 19 Jan 2013 01:31:26 -0600Tsurenka could be a great little player if someone taught her how to serve.https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29634439/wozniacki-vs-tsurenko?post_id=528185091#528185091Tsurenka could be a great little player if someone taught her how to serve.Sat, 19 Jan 2013 01:28:16 -0600Some great rallies! T puts in good effort but looks like W wins them in the end...https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29634439/wozniacki-vs-tsurenko?post_id=528185053#528185053Some great rallies! T puts in good effort but looks like W wins them in the end...Sat, 19 Jan 2013 01:23:20 -0600don't think there's anything wrong with her* she had long matches though and also played qualificationhttps://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29634439/wozniacki-vs-tsurenko?post_id=528185015#528185015don't think there's anything wrong with her* she had long matches though and also played qualificationSat, 19 Jan 2013 01:18:07 -0600tactical/movement still a lot to be desired but she's improving serve is the real problem. but she manageshttps://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29634439/wozniacki-vs-tsurenko?post_id=528184977#528184977tactical/movement still a lot to be desired but she's improving serve is the real problem. but she managesSat, 19 Jan 2013 01:15:19 -0600W is sometimes a bit slow with her feet in the longer rallies...Maybe not in 100% good physical shape.https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29634439/wozniacki-vs-tsurenko?post_id=528184947#528184947W is sometimes a bit slow with her feet in the longer rallies...Maybe not in 100% good physical shape.Sat, 19 Jan 2013 01:12:44 -0600that sentence was supposed to read probably notwhen you asked if she would winnice match report btwhttps://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29634439/wozniacki-vs-tsurenko?post_id=528184891#528184891that sentence was supposed to read probably notwhen you asked if she would winnice match report btwSat, 19 Jan 2013 01:08:55 -0600nofx: What is important?https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29634439/wozniacki-vs-tsurenko?post_id=528184879#528184879nofx: What is important?Sat, 19 Jan 2013 01:07:45 -0600probably not* i meant btw it's kind of important..https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29634439/wozniacki-vs-tsurenko?post_id=528184837#528184837probably not* i meant btw it's kind of important..Sat, 19 Jan 2013 01:04:16 -0600Haha, T breaks again.Statistics doesn't look good for either player:Wozniacki: winners 2 unforced errors 11 = total -9Tsurenko: winners 6 unforced errors 14 = total -8Score now 4-3 to T in 1st set. Current odds 1.29 for W win and 4.30 for T win.Valuehttps://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29634439/wozniacki-vs-tsurenko?post_id=528184811#528184811Haha, T breaks again.Statistics doesn't look good for either player:Wozniacki: winners 2 unforced errors 11 = total -9Tsurenko: winners 6 unforced errors 14 = total -8Score now 4-3 to T in 1st set. Current odds 1.29 for W win and 4.30 for T win.ValueSat, 19 Jan 2013 01:02:38 -0600