<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: bet65p</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29622949/bet65p</link><description>the mugs had the great donald young at 7/4 after he won first set..mugs..i ploughed inthey say bet taken in error and will be settled at 4/11..where do i stand?</description><item><title>Guinn1 11 Jan 13 03:59 Your argument that they wouldn't have given your stake back if Young had lost doesn't stack upI don't agree with this. The bookmaker made the error and therefore it is their own mistake for setting incorrect odds and not the pe</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29622949/bet65p?post_id=527942729#527942729</link><description>Guinn1 11 Jan 13 03:59 Your argument that they wouldn't have given your stake back if Young had lost doesn't stack upI don't agree with this. The bookmaker made the error and therefore it is their own mistake for setting incorrect odds and not the pe</description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 04:39:53 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Yep a palpable error(odds transposed) which you must have been aware of or you wouldn't have 'piled on' Your argument that they wouldn't have given your stake back if Young had lost doesn't stack up as they haven't refused to pay you - you just recei</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29622949/bet65p?post_id=527938247#527938247</link><description>Yep a palpable error(odds transposed) which you must have been aware of or you wouldn't have 'piled on' Your argument that they wouldn't have given your stake back if Young had lost doesn't stack up as they haven't refused to pay you - you just recei</description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 21:59:13 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Yep a palpable error(odds transposed) which you must have been aware of or you wouldn't have 'piled on' Your argument that they wouldn't have given your stake back if Young had lost doesn't stack up as they haven't refused to pay you - you just recei</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29622949/bet65p?post_id=527938245#527938245</link><description>Yep a palpable error(odds transposed) which you must have been aware of or you wouldn't have 'piled on' Your argument that they wouldn't have given your stake back if Young had lost doesn't stack up as they haven't refused to pay you - you just recei</description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 21:59:10 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>sounds they like had the odds reversed, odds should have been young 4/11 and blake 7/4. clear case of palp/bad line and they have the right to void in accordance with their rules.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29622949/bet65p?post_id=527937931#527937931</link><description>sounds they like had the odds reversed, odds should have been young 4/11 and blake 7/4. clear case of palp/bad line and they have the right to void in accordance with their rules.</description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 21:35:55 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>We are contacting you regarding bet ID RQ1414977611I placed at the odds of 7/4 on Donald Young (To Win Match James Blake vs Donald Young). We have identified that this selection was placed at incorrect odds and as such, in accordance with our rules,</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29622949/bet65p?post_id=527937729#527937729</link><description>We are contacting you regarding bet ID RQ1414977611I placed at the odds of 7/4 on Donald Young (To Win Match James Blake vs Donald Young). We have identified that this selection was placed at incorrect odds and as such, in accordance with our rules,</description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 21:22:06 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>exactly.their rules doesnt matter here,if you would go to small claim court</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29622949/bet65p?post_id=527937441#527937441</link><description>exactly.their rules doesnt matter here,if you would go to small claim court</description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 21:01:55 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>not according to them</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29622949/bet65p?post_id=527937383#527937383</link><description>not according to them</description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 20:58:37 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>that cant be right . they offered the odds , u accepted , that binds the contract .</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29622949/bet65p?post_id=527937279#527937279</link><description>that cant be right . they offered the odds , u accepted , that binds the contract .</description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 20:53:08 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>if young had lost would my bet have been returned?...no..nope not a chance..thieving swinewho would back donald young at 4/11..and how did they decide that price?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29622949/bet65p?post_id=527937261#527937261</link><description>if young had lost would my bet have been returned?...no..nope not a chance..thieving swinewho would back donald young at 4/11..and how did they decide that price?</description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 20:52:32 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>they give you a receipt with the time the price etc..but at the end of the day its worth nowt.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29622949/bet65p?post_id=527937235#527937235</link><description>they give you a receipt with the time the price etc..but at the end of the day its worth nowt.</description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 20:49:58 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
