<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Janowicz vs. Tipsarevic</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29472513/janowicz-vs-tipsarevic</link><description>One more tank in Paris?Top10 in paris = TANK (except french top10)</description><item><title>not backhand lol</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29472513/janowicz-vs-tipsarevic?post_id=525710615#525710615</link><description>not backhand lol</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:04:46 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>had*</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29472513/janowicz-vs-tipsarevic?post_id=525710609#525710609</link><description>had*</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:04:33 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Could have worked in your favour if you hand backed Janowicz on the handicap. Betfair try and settles markets wherever possible so they get their commission.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29472513/janowicz-vs-tipsarevic?post_id=525710583#525710583</link><description>Could have worked in your favour if you hand backed Janowicz on the handicap. Betfair try and settles markets wherever possible so they get their commission.</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:04:05 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>pays to shop around I guess...</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29472513/janowicz-vs-tipsarevic?post_id=525710315#525710315</link><description>pays to shop around I guess...</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 12:56:59 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Yup practically all the bookies would have voided. Marathonbet has the same rules as betfair for the tennis handicap.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29472513/janowicz-vs-tipsarevic?post_id=525710245#525710245</link><description>Yup practically all the bookies would have voided. Marathonbet has the same rules as betfair for the tennis handicap.</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 12:55:03 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>you are correct yomomma I understand the rule, it just sucks! Would the bookies have voided...?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29472513/janowicz-vs-tipsarevic?post_id=525710143#525710143</link><description>you are correct yomomma I understand the rule, it just sucks! Would the bookies have voided...?</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 12:52:12 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Janowicz had already covered the handicap so that is a clear win or lose bet.There's a lot of rule difference in tennis, you have to make sure you're clear about your bets especially if you're placing arb bets.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29472513/janowicz-vs-tipsarevic?post_id=525710051#525710051</link><description>Janowicz had already covered the handicap so that is a clear win or lose bet.There's a lot of rule difference in tennis, you have to make sure you're clear about your bets especially if you're placing arb bets.</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 12:48:41 -0500</pubDate></item><item><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29472513/janowicz-vs-tipsarevic?post_id=525710037#525710037</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 12:48:13 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I'm not sure, doesn't seem too fair though.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29472513/janowicz-vs-tipsarevic?post_id=525710031#525710031</link><description>I'm not sure, doesn't seem too fair though.</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 12:48:04 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Maybe it is done like it because a player could be defaulted, for example, and then the total number of games could not have been over 22.5.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29472513/janowicz-vs-tipsarevic?post_id=525710021#525710021</link><description>Maybe it is done like it because a player could be defaulted, for example, and then the total number of games could not have been over 22.5.</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 12:47:47 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
