<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Lukas Rosol to win Wimbledon @1000</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29207809/lukas-rosol-to-win-wimbledon-1000</link><description>&Acirc;&pound;1,225 @ 1000 lucky or shrewd punters?Now only 34 after beating Nadal</description><item><title>can win but probably will notwho knows.most made valid points.if he goes down i hope he goes down in a blaze of glory!!!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29207809/lukas-rosol-to-win-wimbledon-1000?post_id=521378509#521378509</link><description>can win but probably will notwho knows.most made valid points.if he goes down i hope he goes down in a blaze of glory!!!</description><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:40:57 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>rosol in the press conference after the match: "im sorry for rafa, but today i was somebody else."  doesnt seem confident to reproduce this kind of tennis imo.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29207809/lukas-rosol-to-win-wimbledon-1000?post_id=521378369#521378369</link><description>rosol in the press conference after the match: "im sorry for rafa, but today i was somebody else."  doesnt seem confident to reproduce this kind of tennis imo.</description><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:37:36 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>mafeking, you don't know what odds he was</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29207809/lukas-rosol-to-win-wimbledon-1000?post_id=521371127#521371127</link><description>mafeking, you don't know what odds he was</description><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 07:19:44 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Becker was a surprise winner, but no big upset</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29207809/lukas-rosol-to-win-wimbledon-1000?post_id=521371083#521371083</link><description>Becker was a surprise winner, but no big upset</description><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 07:18:29 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Becker had reached qf at AO (then at grass) six months earlier.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29207809/lukas-rosol-to-win-wimbledon-1000?post_id=521370989#521370989</link><description>Becker had reached qf at AO (then at grass) six months earlier.</description><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 07:14:19 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>call it what you like. he was not a big priced winner. he got lucky in that jarryd (i think) did his dirty work for him by taking our mcenroe who presumably would have been a very short priced favourite after demolishing connors the previous year. th</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29207809/lukas-rosol-to-win-wimbledon-1000?post_id=521370965#521370965</link><description>call it what you like. he was not a big priced winner. he got lucky in that jarryd (i think) did his dirty work for him by taking our mcenroe who presumably would have been a very short priced favourite after demolishing connors the previous year. th</description><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 07:13:31 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>mafeking, stop fishing, you know very well that it was one of the biggest shocks in the history of tennis. Becker was a boy of 17 years old, the youngest ever winner, no one gave him a chance even though he won a very weak Queens.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29207809/lukas-rosol-to-win-wimbledon-1000?post_id=521370835#521370835</link><description>mafeking, stop fishing, you know very well that it was one of the biggest shocks in the history of tennis. Becker was a boy of 17 years old, the youngest ever winner, no one gave him a chance even though he won a very weak Queens.</description><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 07:08:14 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>he COULD actually emulate what soderling did at RG, beat nadal and go to the finals and get schooled by djoker/fed, but i highly doubt it because back then, soderling's only problem was his mental abilities (remember his nickname chokerling) and beat</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29207809/lukas-rosol-to-win-wimbledon-1000?post_id=521370605#521370605</link><description>he COULD actually emulate what soderling did at RG, beat nadal and go to the finals and get schooled by djoker/fed, but i highly doubt it because back then, soderling's only problem was his mental abilities (remember his nickname chokerling) and beat</description><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 06:56:57 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>yep he was unseeded but only just. he wasn't a surprise winner by any means</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29207809/lukas-rosol-to-win-wimbledon-1000?post_id=521370599#521370599</link><description>yep he was unseeded but only just. he wasn't a surprise winner by any means</description><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 06:56:48 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>CherylCole is correct, in that 5th set he was unstoppable and if he plays the same way as that, he will beat anyone. It's a very big if though.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29207809/lukas-rosol-to-win-wimbledon-1000?post_id=521370583#521370583</link><description>CherylCole is correct, in that 5th set he was unstoppable and if he plays the same way as that, he will beat anyone. It's a very big if though.</description><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 06:55:59 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
