<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: cilic m vs almagro</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29117375/cilic-m-vs-almagro</link><description>This is a tough one to call seeing as cilic has beaten almagro before 2 sets-1 set6-4 6-7 6-2 in munich in 2010. Almagro might have a edge on these conditions? thoughts ?</description><item><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29117375/cilic-m-vs-almagro?post_id=519682713#519682713</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 14:10:40 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>sorry one correction not 1-6 0-6 what an idiot crotian is</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29117375/cilic-m-vs-almagro?post_id=519682555#519682555</link><description>sorry one correction not 1-6 0-6 what an idiot crotian is</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 14:05:31 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>where has marquinhos gone?? hahahahaahahaha #nugget his parents have probably kicked him off the computer</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29117375/cilic-m-vs-almagro?post_id=519682477#519682477</link><description>where has marquinhos gone?? hahahahaahahaha #nugget his parents have probably kicked him off the computer</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 14:02:33 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>awwww the muppet got his feeling hurt  next time pay attention to ****ing starting price</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29117375/cilic-m-vs-almagro?post_id=519682441#519682441</link><description>awwww the muppet got his feeling hurt  next time pay attention to ****ing starting price</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 14:00:57 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>This really could have gone either way. It all really depended on the first serve percentage. The errors evened out, but whoever has had the better first serve percentage at any given time has been winning. Really fun game though, because both player</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29117375/cilic-m-vs-almagro?post_id=519682373#519682373</link><description>This really could have gone either way. It all really depended on the first serve percentage. The errors evened out, but whoever has had the better first serve percentage at any given time has been winning. Really fun game though, because both player</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 13:58:10 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>you was first noob marin77  so big idiot</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29117375/cilic-m-vs-almagro?post_id=519682251#519682251</link><description>you was first noob marin77  so big idiot</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 13:54:59 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>where has marquinhos gone?? hahahahaahahaha #nugget</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29117375/cilic-m-vs-almagro?post_id=519682227#519682227</link><description>where has marquinhos gone?? hahahahaahahaha #nugget</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 13:54:34 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>made*</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29117375/cilic-m-vs-almagro?post_id=519682215#519682215</link><description>made*</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 13:54:15 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Hard to say who is a bigger idiot, Cilic or ze noobs who kade him fav at the start of 3rd set.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29117375/cilic-m-vs-almagro?post_id=519682209#519682209</link><description>Hard to say who is a bigger idiot, Cilic or ze noobs who kade him fav at the start of 3rd set.</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 13:54:03 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>why i am always true</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/29117375/cilic-m-vs-almagro?post_id=519682097#519682097</link><description>why i am always true</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 13:51:54 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
