New Posts For Thread: Mona Barthelhttps://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/28900629/mona-barthelWill she tank? That is the question...10 holds yes now that was an exceptional fluke!, especially given their respective matches prior to it when they weren't convincing on serve to say the leasthttps://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/28900629/mona-barthel?post_id=516012955#51601295510 holds yes now that was an exceptional fluke!, especially given their respective matches prior to it when they weren't convincing on serve to say the leastMon, 06 Feb 2012 08:20:09 -0600Of course it means something ffs. It means you will lose the game! So not much different from two argentines playing each other on a clay court.If we don't count the freak results like yesterday Lisicki-Kvitova where they went....21 (?) straight gamehttps://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/28900629/mona-barthel?post_id=516012243#516012243Of course it means something ffs. It means you will lose the game! So not much different from two argentines playing each other on a clay court.If we don't count the freak results like yesterday Lisicki-Kvitova where they went....21 (?) straight gameMon, 06 Feb 2012 07:51:40 -0600how i love the fact that having serve means nothing in the women's game. one break does it in the men's game usually, this one is on course for three of the first four games...https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/28900629/mona-barthel?post_id=516012137#516012137how i love the fact that having serve means nothing in the women's game. one break does it in the men's game usually, this one is on course for three of the first four games...Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:46:40 -0600So that's two now....Will Jankovic make it three?https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/28900629/mona-barthel?post_id=516011939#516011939So that's two now....Will Jankovic make it three?Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:38:16 -0600Mattek can lose now too!https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/28900629/mona-barthel?post_id=516011815#516011815Mattek can lose now too!Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:33:27 -0600Looking fwd to this 1!https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/28900629/mona-barthel?post_id=516011509#516011509Looking fwd to this 1!Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:21:51 -0600ATP has exactly the same lucky loser rules...https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/28900629/mona-barthel?post_id=516011341#516011341ATP has exactly the same lucky loser rules...Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:15:35 -0600One of the wonders of women's tennis! I think Barthel will want to go through automatically as I don't see much difference in being the lucky loser as the route is similar...https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/28900629/mona-barthel?post_id=516011235#516011235One of the wonders of women's tennis! I think Barthel will want to go through automatically as I don't see much difference in being the lucky loser as the route is similar...Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:11:50 -0600ah Jimmy i didn't know about Kanepi, cheershttps://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/28900629/mona-barthel?post_id=516011099#516011099ah Jimmy i didn't know about Kanepi, cheersMon, 06 Feb 2012 07:04:44 -0600So basically Barthel will play for an additional 8 ranking points and if she fancies the qualifier spots on the draw more than Kanepi's spot. At least I think as a lucky loser she would directly take Kanepi's place without any shuffling in the draw.https://community.betfair.com/tennis/go/thread/view/94186/28900629/mona-barthel?post_id=516011045#516011045So basically Barthel will play for an additional 8 ranking points and if she fancies the qualifier spots on the draw more than Kanepi's spot. At least I think as a lucky loser she would directly take Kanepi's place without any shuffling in the draw.Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:01:58 -0600