By:
Joe was this years zeitgeist, if he had won
![]() |
By:
Not really
|
By:
Oh he would have been
|
By:
in your opinion
|
By:
Correct
|
By:
not in mine ;)
|
By:
Sure
|
By:
I’m pleased Joe didn’t win in relation to future series’.Would have made betting on these shows very different if a similar contestant was involved.
|
By:
yes, at least we have the answer to what might have been unknown.
He has been a terrific signing though and an indicator of why the shows keeps thriving and moving forwards rather than dying on its @rse |
By:
The casting on SCD is almost always excellent.
You will always get the occasional disappointment but in general it’s exemplary and perhaps the reason the show continues to do well. |
By:
I feel it would be a mistake to think Joe done well just because of his social media background. For me Stacey and Joe dominated the series, at least the latter stages. Stacey was a tough opponent and a deserved winner. Joe was level for me before the top female angle became available.
|
By:
|
By:
as is your halo
|
By:
I agree that he will have won over a lot of people who had no clue who he was beforehand or had just heard the name (ie me)
|
By:
It's the hollywood stuff that sells best, and he did no ballroom aside from the little SD bits in a 'rocky' outfit, even though he was far better in br. It was a mistake on their part if they turned down the chance to do the QS.
|
By:
Not much option with the SD music.
|
By:
betfair **** up on strictly betfair betting on first 3 but only winner announced yet £36000 taken in bets obviously money will have to be given back otherwise freud committed
|
By:
I had two bets very early on Stacey outright and top female.
As I said on here if she avoided the dance-offs then she was pretty much a certainty. It is becoming more and more a popularity contest. Either that or the judges are clueless. You look first and foremost at someone who has appeal and if they can dance a bit then you have a possible bet. |