By:
"They must think we are stupid" said the rep from a company who accepted bets on an event which had already finished. Says it all that the company which was once the most respected name in bookmaking is resorting to getting scraps of free publicity by announcing their incompetence to the nation.
|
By:
For Ladbrokes to come out of this with any competence they must have planned this as a publicity stunt all along.
|
By:
i phoned up and they told me the price had scone
|
By:
I heard people were putting hundreds and thousands on it.
|
By:
Whats the betting these bets are not honoured when laddies pull out the red card for some perceived technicality hidden in the t and c's,it does make a change to hear the bookies squealing
|
By:
Are you our old friend `roach`? If not, welcome.
|
By:
Someone will lose their dough.
|
By:
6/4 Nadiya, I thought this was a done deal?
|
By:
Nadiya is a Choux-in
(Copyright Fig) |
By:
Nadiya 6/4... into 1/5... bookie scandal?
|
By:
It's not a scandal, she's won it, I thought everybody knew that.
|
By:
free money then....
http://www.oddschecker.com/tv/great-british-bake-off/winner |
By:
1.57 available now with Betfair
|
By:
|
By:
you soppy muffin
|
By:
She was a lovely young woman
Ukippers seething no doubt |
By:
I agree bear. I avoided looking at the betting as I didn't want to spoil the result. Amazed she was 6/4. I thought she was an absolute cert.
What was the ladbrokes story all about? |
By:
Just read it but it doesn't say who the 'pesky insiders' were backing
Was Nadiya backed with them? |
By:
I never read the story Fig, but this screenshot would suggest Lads were just doing a publicity story
If i'd have seen that 12/1 |
By:
oops
' https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CQouFsoUAAQbp5V.png |
By:
They're yesterdays odds btw
|
By:
The 20p @ 12/1 could have come in handy
|