Dec 10, 2014 -- 5:18PM, downandout wrote:
Surely betting should be based on some form of evidence? Just because someone is a big price, isn't is just chucking money away in hope unless you have some kind of grounding to the possibility of andrea making 2nd. I'm not saying it definitively won't happen, but you seem to have backed it solely on the basis that if he happens to make 2nd you can lay off. There are plenty of horses running at 100/1+ each day that you could bet, in the hope they get near the front near the end on that basis?
Firstly, I haven't paced any bets yet was just asking the question.
Secondly, there's a chance he has some bounce effect from being B2 last week. I also see him having more appeal to the one off viewers/voters for the final.
I'm in too much of a state to add anymore
Dec 13, 2014 -- 3:14AM, squares wrote:
it's public domain isn't it, was about to post on here as I did with Judy, but not sure now
what you talking about squares?