New Posts For Thread: 4th Eliminationhttps://community.betfair.com/specials/go/thread/view/94178/30756663/4th-eliminationIf last night's bottom two are to be believed then, regardless of whether Carol's previous two "it might be you"s were genuine or not, it seems that Wayne's support is below that of Carol. And, clearly, below that of Sam. Although a rather dull triallolhttps://community.betfair.com/specials/go/thread/view/94178/30756663/4th-elimination?post_id=550537461#550537461lolTue, 29 Nov 2016 13:43:08 -0600hihttps://community.betfair.com/specials/go/thread/view/94178/30756663/4th-elimination?post_id=550537387#550537387hiTue, 29 Nov 2016 13:31:43 -0600Hello and welcome, Terry.https://community.betfair.com/specials/go/thread/view/94178/30756663/4th-elimination?post_id=550537367#550537367Hello and welcome, Terry.Tue, 29 Nov 2016 13:29:47 -0600think Sam Quek will go tonight, currently 3.25 on sportsbookhttps://community.betfair.com/specials/go/thread/view/94178/30756663/4th-elimination?post_id=550537341#550537341think Sam Quek will go tonight, currently 3.25 on sportsbookTue, 29 Nov 2016 13:26:28 -0600Sorry Ursershttps://community.betfair.com/specials/go/thread/view/94178/30756663/4th-elimination?post_id=550537317#550537317Sorry UrsersTue, 29 Nov 2016 13:23:35 -0600I'm actually irritated by you adding ers to every forumites namehttps://community.betfair.com/specials/go/thread/view/94178/30756663/4th-elimination?post_id=550537309#550537309I'm actually irritated by you adding ers to every forumites nameTue, 29 Nov 2016 13:22:04 -0600Agree with the above by Hemmers and Mythers, but I remember being burnt by Eubank. Either way, still outstanding value.https://community.betfair.com/specials/go/thread/view/94178/30756663/4th-elimination?post_id=550537293#550537293Agree with the above by Hemmers and Mythers, but I remember being burnt by Eubank. Either way, still outstanding value.Tue, 29 Nov 2016 13:20:02 -0600O and Im in agreement with SE :Dhttps://community.betfair.com/specials/go/thread/view/94178/30756663/4th-elimination?post_id=550537255#550537255O and Im in agreement with SE :DTue, 29 Nov 2016 13:14:22 -0600I cant see any reason he would have been a fake bottom 2 they usually do it for a reason and he is fairly dull character but still nice all the same. Only worry is the bottom 2 bounce which can easily be negated by a bad/non edit. Also with 2 femaleshttps://community.betfair.com/specials/go/thread/view/94178/30756663/4th-elimination?post_id=550537249#550537249I cant see any reason he would have been a fake bottom 2 they usually do it for a reason and he is fairly dull character but still nice all the same. Only worry is the bottom 2 bounce which can easily be negated by a bad/non edit. Also with 2 femalesTue, 29 Nov 2016 13:13:13 -0600Hi SpinCertainly wouldn't put you off backing him,however the person who gets the "it might be you" but survives has a decent track record of escaping the next elimination.Bit like the XF bounce I suppose.....viewers know they're in trouble and are mhttps://community.betfair.com/specials/go/thread/view/94178/30756663/4th-elimination?post_id=550537245#550537245Hi SpinCertainly wouldn't put you off backing him,however the person who gets the "it might be you" but survives has a decent track record of escaping the next elimination.Bit like the XF bounce I suppose.....viewers know they're in trouble and are mTue, 29 Nov 2016 13:12:32 -0600