Only a fortnight ago Ronnie was 4-0 down to Higginson in a first to five and he looked like he just wasn't there at all. Then he turned it on and won the tournament. I would take long odds on him in this position.
Only a fortnight ago Ronnie was 4-0 down to Higginson in a first to five and he looked like he just wasn't there at all. Then he turned it on and won the tournament. I would take long odds on him in this position.
"I got the run of the balls and that was the difference".
As badly as ROS played, I agree with Thorne - His attitude was good. Which is good in the long term as he still has plenty of talent to compete.
Fair comment from Selby there:"I got the run of the balls and that was the difference".As badly as ROS played, I agree with Thorne - His attitude was good. Which is good in the long term as he still has plenty of talent to compete.
ok..NOW I know why the odds were 1.63 for Ronnie. I backed him and a poor Ronnie showed up on the night, every credit to Selby though, he played well and kept his nerve. Ronnie played Well done Selby backers.
ok..NOW I know why the odds were 1.63 for Ronnie. I backed him and a poor Ronnie showed up on the night, every credit to Selby though, he played well and kept his nerve. Ronnie played Well done Selby backers.