Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Carsten19
17 Jan 10 23:25
Joined:
Date Joined: 04 Apr 06
| Topic/replies: 390 | Blogger: Carsten19's blog
It was only one needed wasn`t it, shouldn`t he have at least waited for Selby to make some more balls?
cheers
Pause Switch to Standard View Why did Ronnie not try to get the...
Show More
Loading...
Report Woodsy1987 January 17, 2010 11:26 PM GMT
Think Selby would have potted that red anyway ...
Report Robbie GOD Fowler January 17, 2010 11:26 PM GMT
needed 2
Report Arthur Jenks January 17, 2010 11:27 PM GMT
Even that act deprived Selby of proper finish. O'Sullivan is the most miserable d1ck.
Report Woodsy1987 January 17, 2010 11:27 PM GMT
Fu ck potting the red I had 50 on Selby, happy to see that handshake
Report pc1000 January 17, 2010 11:27 PM GMT
He was betting against himself IMO.
Report Dr Uce January 17, 2010 11:28 PM GMT
Agree even if he needed 3 snookers he should have carried on. Plenty of balls on the table. He needs a reality shock!
Report pc1000 January 17, 2010 11:28 PM GMT
1st rule of sports is never give up.

So rigged IMO.
Report Woodsy1987 January 17, 2010 11:28 PM GMT
Yeah him, R Wood and Damian Hurst lit up Betfair and the purple place bigtime
Report Woodsy1987 January 17, 2010 11:29 PM GMT
NO CHANCE PC
Report davyb January 17, 2010 11:29 PM GMT
Fair play to selby, after watching him against allan and maguire i thought he was struggling with his game, it just seems he needs to be facing defeat in the face for him to produce his best snooker, i can only see an in form higgins stopping him at this years world championships.
Report Woodsy1987 January 17, 2010 11:29 PM GMT
3 snookers? When was the last time someone won from 3 snookers behind ...
Report Hansi January 17, 2010 11:33 PM GMT
Mark King came back from 2 or 3 Snookers needed in the decider against Walden recently.
Report mafeking January 17, 2010 11:33 PM GMT
mark king recently but generally hardly ever
Report Dr Uce January 17, 2010 11:38 PM GMT
3 SNOOKERS IN A FINAL FRAME OF A FINAL..... YOU GOTTA GO FOR IT FFS
Report Lori January 18, 2010 7:14 AM GMT

Arthur Jenks 18 Jan 00:27
Even that act deprived Selby of proper finish. O'Sullivan is the most miserable d1ck.


What act? He looked at Selby to see if he wanted to come back to the table. Selby sensibly declined.
Report Alkeyhole January 18, 2010 8:48 AM GMT
O'Sullivan has no bottle. A true great would always play on in those situations & every so often they'd win them.
Report thegiggilo January 18, 2010 9:09 AM GMT
;)
Report bflame January 18, 2010 9:37 AM GMT
because it was fixed for chumps like you all
Report Alkeyhole January 18, 2010 10:22 AM GMT
Just watched most of the last session on iPlayer. Marvellous. O'sullivan whining then going home in a sulk was the icing on the sweet cake.

I'm sure it won't be enough to make the spineless little toe-rag actually go through with his continual promise to give up the game but we can always hope. Hopefully his dad got to watch the final.
Report speedboat January 18, 2010 3:32 PM GMT
1 snooker and a free ball................
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com