Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
jackdanny
17 Jan 10 14:48
Joined:
Date Joined: 12 Jul 04
| Topic/replies: 793 | Blogger: jackdanny's blog
If Willie Thorne and John virgo were young men today would they be good enough to be in the top 16 or even 32 ?
Pause Switch to Standard View A question for older snooker fans
Show More
Loading...
Report Glasgow100 January 17, 2010 2:51 PM GMT
wouldnt get in the top 32
Report Hansi January 17, 2010 2:54 PM GMT
not in the top 32 if they played to the same level they did 20 years ago
Report snookerbacker January 17, 2010 3:03 PM GMT
Virgo was only just good enough to be in the top 16 when he was at his best. And what's with the older? I'm still in my thirties ya cheeky young scamp.
Report weezer January 17, 2010 3:29 PM GMT
No, no way any of them would get in the top 32. They were both lucky they were born when they were otherwise they wouldn't be getting paid for talking carp like they are now.
Report The Mod father January 17, 2010 4:34 PM GMT
Both to busy doing there cobblers on the gee gee's to get any real practice in
Report gentlemanjohn January 17, 2010 4:45 PM GMT
Thorne at his peak would be top 10 at the least. Virgo top 16 minimum. If Marco Fu & Ryan Day are in the top 10 then maybe the modern standard isn't all its cracked up to be?
Report gentlemanjohn January 17, 2010 4:47 PM GMT
On second thoughts forget Virgo, but thorne had bundles of talent, just cud never close the deal
Report Brodie January 17, 2010 4:49 PM GMT
The standard has gone way up and the pockets much tighter ,but the standard goes up each generation and they can be thankful to the generation before for raising the bar.
Davis of the 80s would struggle massively to win one in this era.
Not a big enough scorer.
Report Brodie January 17, 2010 4:50 PM GMT
win one world championship* ^
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com