Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
jackdanny
17 Jan 10 14:48
Joined:
Date Joined: 12 Jul 04
| Topic/replies: 793 | Blogger: jackdanny's blog
If Willie Thorne and John virgo were young men today would they be good enough to be in the top 16 or even 32 ?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 9
By:
Glasgow100
When: 17 Jan 10 14:51
wouldnt get in the top 32
By:
Hansi
When: 17 Jan 10 14:54
not in the top 32 if they played to the same level they did 20 years ago
By:
snookerbacker
When: 17 Jan 10 15:03
Virgo was only just good enough to be in the top 16 when he was at his best. And what's with the older? I'm still in my thirties ya cheeky young scamp.
By:
weezer
When: 17 Jan 10 15:29
No, no way any of them would get in the top 32. They were both lucky they were born when they were otherwise they wouldn't be getting paid for talking carp like they are now.
By:
The Mod father
When: 17 Jan 10 16:34
Both to busy doing there cobblers on the gee gee's to get any real practice in
By:
gentlemanjohn
When: 17 Jan 10 16:45
Thorne at his peak would be top 10 at the least. Virgo top 16 minimum. If Marco Fu & Ryan Day are in the top 10 then maybe the modern standard isn't all its cracked up to be?
By:
gentlemanjohn
When: 17 Jan 10 16:47
On second thoughts forget Virgo, but thorne had bundles of talent, just cud never close the deal
By:
Brodie
When: 17 Jan 10 16:49
The standard has gone way up and the pockets much tighter ,but the standard goes up each generation and they can be thankful to the generation before for raising the bar.
Davis of the 80s would struggle massively to win one in this era.
Not a big enough scorer.
By:
Brodie
When: 17 Jan 10 16:50
win one world championship* ^
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com